1) Russia has never had an LHD before. The Mistral class is a good LHD that the Russians can learn a lot from.Don't know if this was posted before, but can anyone explain why Russia need to buy Mistral class? What puzzles me is that Russia have build aircraft carrier before. Is it because it is faster to buy from the French then build one on their own?
1) Russia has never had an LHD before. The Mistral class is a good LHD that the Russians can learn a lot from.
2) Russian shipbuilding took a big hit after the collapse. They have nt built a carrier since. This deal (France building the first two and Russian building the second two) will give Russia a huge infusion of capability.
3) The amphibious power projection capabilities, with air assault, helicopter air support, etc. is something that will enhance the Russian capabilities.
These are all apparently things that the Russian naval planners and their leadership desire. The first is already launched and fitting out:
The Russian Navy could build a Helicopter Carrier or a Ship with a well deck and a ship that does both but a LHD is more then just a Flat top and landing ship. She is also a Command ship, and Mistral uses a state of the Art Propulsion system.I can understand point 2 since this was discussed long time ago, and that pretty much seal the deal to buy from foreign. For point 1, it puzzles me what they will be learning from buying a foreign LHD, instead of designing and building its own LHD. Is it similar to the case like China with the Liaoning, where Russia will initially perform studies on an existing platform and improve on it later on and design their own version?
Don't know if this was posted before, but can anyone explain why Russia need to buy Mistral class? What puzzles me is that Russia have build aircraft carrier before. Is it because it is faster to buy from the French then build one on their own?
Clearly, the Russian planners think differently.Actually, they don't need it at all (slow,underarmed, not suited for Arctic conditions ... ) It was political payback for French mediation during Georgia war .
World Wide Aircraft Carriers said:The Russians have never operated a large LHD class vessel in the past. However, they did make changes to the vessel for their particular sevice. This included changes to the island and bridge, changes to the sensor suite, a strengthened hull for artic operations, a well deck door that completely encloses the well deck (the French door is open at the top), and changes to the self defensive weapons. The weapons fit will include Russian built Ghebka anti-air missile systems, AK630 30mm CIWS systems, and DP-65 Grende launchers as well as 14.5mm machine guns.
The Russians plan to outfit the carrier with a mix of navalized Ka-52K Alligator attack helicopters and Ka-29 helicopters for troop transport, Ka-27 helicopters for anti-submarine partol, and Ka-31 helicopters for Aerial Early Warning (AEW). The principle use will be amphibious assault, but the vessels can also serve as the centerpiece for a heavy anti-submarine warfare task force.
Nice thought, but realistically not going to happen. Obama simply cannot find it within himself to be that direct.Maybe US should think of paying the French the money for these and avoid Russia getting thier hands on these ships
Rather than letting the get weapons and then building your own to deter them it's better to stop them getting them in the first place
Clearly, the Russian planners think differently.
It would be a real coup though if the US bought them, then gave one to the Ukraine and one to Georgia, along with a couple of Perry class Frigates each to escort them. LOL!.
Well, I said it was wistful thinking.And then, in case of war, Russia would either sink of capture those ships intact, like they did last time