What makes Russia’s new spy ship Yantar special?
By Laurence Peter
BBC News
The Russian navy is very proud of its new spy ship, the Yantar, which is now doing Argentina a favour by helping to search for a missing submarine.
Argentina has given up trying to rescue the 44 crew aboard the ARA San Juan , which disappeared on 15 November. But it still wants to find the diesel-electric submarine.
Enter the Yantar, officially an oceanographic research vessel, but actually bristling with surveillance equipment, and the mother ship for manned and unmanned deep-sea submersibles.
A Russian ROV - remotely operated underwater vehicle - is scouring the ocean floor off Argentina.
But what else has the Yantar (Russian for "amber") been up to?
Yantar is an interesting vessel with some rather special capabilities, but I don't think it will be doing a lot of clandestine work OR contribute much to actual submarine rescue (which was the problem with Kursk, as opposed to search, as it is now doing for Argentina).
For the former task, Russia's nuclear-powered deep-submergence vessels and their converted nuclear submarine mothership (which will soon be an Oscar II based boat) are more suitable, unless the objective is very deep down - that is to say, deeper than 1500m or so. As they can transit to the area of operations underwater, you wouldn't even get news items of a Russian ship loitering in a suspicious place like the above - Yantar is going to conduct mostly work which is explicitly NOT clandestine (i.e. which Russia is at least ok with having or even *wants* the public to know about).
Similarly, for rescue there is a better alternative in Igor Belousov (a hull closely related to Yantar) which carries proper rescue submersibles.
All indications are that the Plane They are talking about is a P8 Poseidon flying over the Eastern Med. Well Russian media suddenly has it flying over there Airbase. It's a regular patrol for the USN.
Shrug. Just like Western media (particularly British) hyperventilating as soon as a Russian military aircraft comes within visible range of the 12 mile limit. With reports like this, it is generally good practice to first subtract 80% of the drama for exaggeration before evaluating further, no matter who was the intruder and who was (or feels) intruded upon