Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
Jura The idiot
General
related to
Apr 1, 2016
but she obviously won't be commissioned this year
Apr 1, 2016
OK 431 according to the most recent picture (and Russian wiki hehe):
Jura The idiot
General
^^^
speaking of Project 22350 ... just a picture:
speaking of Project 22350 ... just a picture:
Ahh this article is very well done and realistic with a very slight touch of humor.. One thing the article did not mention was logistics. The Russians have zero ability to rearm and refuel simultaneously at sea. Something the USN has perfected.
From the article...
Got a news flash for the person that wrote this article. Fuel weighs just as much if not more than ordnance. So my question is will the Mig-29 with buddy stores be shore based or will the Russians use tankers already in place in Syria? I can't imangine a Mig-29 fully loaded with fuel and a buddy store taking off from a ski ramp...I'll see if I can find a photo of that.
Ok This was tagged on to the end of the article and I found it humorous..
Reminds me of when I was aboard USS Hancock (CVA 19) a real aircraft carrier. That old girl just kept a-goin'!..no matter what and we did not have a fleet tug following us around.
Exact and your funny
i like it muchYes Fuel tanks 2 or 4 normaly for this missions are very heavy about 1.5 t each + refueling pod seems much...
Russian don't have refuelings aircrafts in Syria coz useless fighters based to only 300/400 km of their targets close.
For me STOBAR system allow a payload of about 2/3 of the max, saying for Su-33, Mig-29K which have a max payload of 6.5, 5.5 t about 4 t i can' t be exact ofc but all experts, observers say the weapons load for an aircraft used from a STOBAR is clearly more limited and only CATOBAR allow to an aircraft to be used with a full payload than from a land base and STOBAR can' t use AWACS aircraft important coz their radars are much more powerful than a AEW helo.
In this case 2 FTs for Mig-29K, USN Super Hornet for refueling have always 4 FTs.
Now confirmed Gorshkov as Jura has yet mentionned for Novembner and Kasatonov in 2017.related to
Apr 1, 2016
OK 431 according to the most recent picture (and Russian wiki hehe):
but she obviously won't be commissioned this year
I post a chart i have do recently customised an in english later according infos i udapte but i need add 20386 now
Last edited:
Jura The idiot
General
... many in Russian Internet say 2018 ... time will tell
And in the meantime i see necessary also i udapte for Grigorovich but how many 20386 ordered ( right now nothing on wiki even russian and out ? ) and some spécifications Displ. etc...
I have forget also eventualy some datas for Pr 22350 Arctic same i have only armament thank you
Last edited:
Jura The idiot
General
I saw just babbling by some manager from a shipyard
about "more than ten" to be built in total (in two shipyards):
no idea what you're asking
109 m length; 13 m beam; 3400 t displacement; 30 kn max. speed; 5k nm range; complement of 80:and some spécifications Displ. etc...
go ahead, naysay it
I'm puzzled by the propulsion "solution"
heck I've read they still don't have the testing facility for domestic M90FRs (and other turbines) ready, not to say the production line hahaha, and at the same time are fantasizing about the electric propulsion for Project 20386:
elsewhere this approach would be called "concurrency" hahaha
now I lost it: what's "Pr 22350 Arctic" Mon Dieu!I have forget also eventualy some datas for Pr 22350 Arctic same i have only armament thank you
are you referring to the Admiral Gorschkov (417) currently in maybe??