Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
come on, let's be practical. Other than Essex, the rest were still there because it's taxpayers dollars and the government didn't want to waste it. The ships themselves were no longer adequate as soon as antiship missiles were equipped on both sides. Later those ships had to go through major updates and spend years in the dry dock.
Popeye was referring to World War II and the Essex class that was put out during that war. They operated very well and there were no anti-ship missiles...although you could call a kamiikazi perhaps a manned anti-ship missile. But the US did not lose fleet carriers to those attacks, though it was a close thing a couple of times, ie the USS Franklin.

After the war the US reduced numbers of ships (and carriers) drastically...from a hundred carriers down to something like 18.

They put angled decks on some of the older carriers when the time came...but then they built the Forrestal Class, followed by the Enterprise, followed by the Nimitz class. All of which have been supreme carriers.

When the angled decks were placed on the older carriers, none of them spent "years" in dry dock, and they didn't become different vessels. They added the angle decks, better cats, and then they kept doing what they were designed to do.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
No pakje the Russians could only finish one carrier and then the fall of the USSR stopped the second which was sold too china.

The Chances of seeing a new Russian Carrier before then seem about as High a real zombie uprising.
That said I am thinking that the 2020 date is looking better for a start date,because the Mistral Deal would give the Russians access too the latest in large ship propulsion and radar air command systems along side a Capable Helo carrier platform. Add in the Indian navy fighter programs allowing Russia too restart the production line.
speaking of new programs

View attachment 6069
well the big are still floating the small is changing too.
The new prototype of the former AK200 now AK12.
points of interest according too the Firearms blog include
Multi-caliber 5.45,5.56,7.62x39,and 7.62x51
Ambidextrous forward charging handle.
New safety switch.
New fire control switch with three modes of fire (single shot, 3 round burst and full auto).
New hinged top cover. The cover is a lot more rigid that the previous AK rifles.
milstd style rails
Folding and length adjustable stock.
new pistol grip
New muzzle brake that attaches to standard NATO threading.
Improved barrel rifling.

It still looks too use the same AK74 based gas piston system Although the system from the AK107/108 might have been a better choice.
Barrel length looks like the same ol' 16 inches it looks like the results of a drunken one night stand between a FN scar and a AK.

It seems odd for the AK-12 to have a fire selector switch on the right side of the weapon (left handed) instead of the on left (right handed) like the M-4/M-16 base type. Unless I'm wrong it could be a safety switch?
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Actually the AK47 has a right side selector. the selector on the traditional AK series pulls double duty as a dust cover and safety it is a large hinge device that must be flipped down too fire. It's rather crude in that it was built too go too full automatic before any other firing mode and has been known too be missed, having handled an AR I can say unless modified M16A2 has the selector/safety on the right side.
The AK12 however is said too have a Ambi selector/safety meaning that on the other ( no picture yet available) there should be another identical switch. A lot of this system seems too be based on the IMI Galil in terms new features It is not a Galil Clone but the influence is there Including the placement of the Charging handle.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
During war times do countries still pay the shipyards etc for the arms they produced or is there some other arrangements?

In the US..Of course. Shipyards are paid for their work. They just don't build ships and try to sell them like an auto manufacture builds cars.
 
Last edited:

navyreco

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Mistral class amphibious assault ships built in France for the Russian Navy will be equipped with Russian-made weaponry, Navy Commander Adm. Vladimir Vysotsky said on Thursday.

“The main armaments installed on the ships will be Russian-made,” Vysotsky said.

The admiral said that the Mistrals for the Russian Navy will be better armed than their French counterparts for staving off airborne and submarine threats.
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Yantar Shipyard in the Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad will start on Wednesday the construction of a new Krivak IV class frigate for Russia's Black Sea Fleet.

The Admiral Makarov is the last in a series of three Krivak IV class frigates built for the Russian Navy under a tender won by Yantar in 2010.


---------- Post added at 11:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 AM ----------

Russian Mistral will be real battlecruisers :)

Russian Navy Mistrals to be fitted with Offensive Weapons
According to ITAR-TASS citing a source in Russian defense industry newest Russian strike and defensive weapon systems including supersonic cruise missiles will be fitted on all four Mistral-class amphibious assault ships built for Russian Navy in France and Russia.


"As is planned, first two French-made ships and other two helicopter-carriers built in Russia will be armed with state-of-the-art Russian weapon systems including supersonic cruise missile launchers, and advanced missile/air/submarine defense systems", specified the source.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


They will fit Kh-35E (3M-24E) to Mistrals ?
For sure they'll be in quite a different league compared to their French counterparts
 

Scratch

Captain
Russia has now also signed a deal for MiG-29K fighters to be delivered between 2013 & '15. Will be interesting to see if they operate together with the Su-33s, or if the letter will be phased out, considering they are probably getting a little dated.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Russian navy signs for MiG-29K fighters

Russia has signed a contract to acquire 20 MiG-29K carrier-based fighters and four MiG-29KUB trainers. MiG confirmed on 29 February that defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov and MiG general director Sergei Korotkov had signed the contract. The value of the deal was not disclosed.

Deliveries will be made between 2013 and 2015, with the aircraft to be operated from the Russian navy's lone carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, serving with its Northern Fleet based in Murmansk. The vessel currently operates Sukhoi Su-33 naval fighters.
"The signature of this contract is a real step in fulfilling our programme for rearming the forces. The naval air forces will get a modern combat aircraft - as good as any in the world," Serdyukov said.
The contract will guarantee MiG a steady level of work in the medium term, Korotkov added.

The MiG-29K is a navalised variant of the MiG-29M land-based fighter, with folding wings, an arrestor tail-hook, strengthened airframe, Zhuk-ME multimode radar and multi-role capability. It can be armed with a wide variety of air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons, including Kh-31 anti-ship missiles.
India's navy is the only export customer for the type, which will be flown from a refitted Russian-built carrier expected to be delivered at the end of this year.
The Russian navy experimented with a navalised MiG-29 prototype in the 1980s onboard the Admiral Kuznetsov, but opted for the Su-33 instead.
It is not known if the navy will continue to operate the Su-33 alongside the MiG-29K.
 
Top