Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Amigo Miragedriver, I'm sorry for nitpicking, but I suggest instead of

... Promising destroyer project Leader will be winged and armed with anti-aircraft missiles secretive home, ...

"The prospective Leader-class destroyers will be armed with cruise missiles and over-the-horizon anti-aircraft missiles in VLS" etc., this time your google-translation was ... secretive LOL

Hope you don't consider this a censorship! :)
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Latest info regarding T50-5R alias rebuild '055' via "Berkut" from the Key-Forum:



So let's hope ...

The timing is about right, and I don't doubt that this was not only the easiest, but the most effective way to repair 055. To disassemble that aircraft a piece at a time, remove damage and replace structure would increase the cost and effort 100 fold. To bring in another fuselage, and begin to "plug and play" as you reassemble another prototype is so much better and cleaner, get the fire damaged junk to the ditch, replace those nearly pristine un-damaged parts onto a complete new wiring harness and connect the dots, let the aircraft system do its own self-diagnostics??? and you are good to go.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
The new Russian soldier future, Ratnik-2, will be released between 2025 and 2030

OICoYmD.jpg

(defensa.com) The program of future Russian fighter called Ratnik (Guerrero), already in service with the Russian Armed Forces, is still in development. Its evolution, Ratnik-2, could take between 10 and 15 years. This has been recognized president of the Foundation for Advanced Research Russian Andrei Grigoryev.

This Foundation, together with the Scientific Institute for Precision Machine Building (TsNIITochMash), working on the development of Ratnik-2 version, which would bring together a number of ideas and proposals that are currently under study. Before it enters into service shall be prepared and evaluated the project and undertaken research and development to address mass production, which would occur no earlier than 2025.

vgzpWtp.jpg

The future Russian fighter program Ratnik was presented at the fair Russia Arms Expo 2013 held in the city of Nizhny Taquil and publicly displayed during the parade on May 9 Red Square in Russia. It is planned that this year 50,000 personal computers, a figure repeated in the following year are provided. It is in line developed in the West, as it consists of 50 items ranging from personal equipment, portable advanced communications, weapons systems with enhanced displays, power systems or armored vests new design. This suite of equipment will be used by the infantry, paratroopers, operators rockets, machine guns servants, drivers and reconnaissance units. In its basic version, the suit fifth class body armor protection weighs 10 kilograms. In its full version, with helmet and bulletproof vest sixth class of protection and other protective elements, weighs 20 kilograms.

The program involved fifty Russian companies and although not all the details are not yet known, available personal protective equipment ceramic, fireproof overalls, helmets with data reporting systems of the main gun and camera recording plus systems GLONASS satellite navigation.

Link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Using this photo, the tack width seems to be 550 mm; however, in this day and age, there are many distorted photos, thanks to change in aspect ratios that can often happen.

4qxkvrh.jpg

Due to fundamental armor vehicle design requirements, I think, a track-width of 580 mm (that for T-72, T-80, or T-90) is an upper bound for a good tank design. That is the reason ob''ekt 279 had 4 tracks; having only 2 tracks wouldn't have worked for its weight without thinning the armor.

T-72 started life with a ground pressure of 0.85 kgs/cm^2; 0.8 kgs/cm^2 may be too good, in this day and age, for a tank.

Hence, for a track width of 0.58 m, a track length on the ground of 5 m, and a ground-pressure of 0.85 kgs/cm^2, the total weight would be 49 t.


Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Can This Chinese Tank Beat Russia’s T-14 Armata?
Chinese tank maker Norinco claims that its VT-4 is superior to Russia’s deadliest armored fighting vehicle.

Link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Last week, China Daily reported that China’s biggest developer and manufacturer of land armaments, China North Industries Group Corporation, is aggressively promoting its products on WeChat, a social networking app with more than 500 million users.

During Norinco’s latest marketing drive on WeChat, the company claims that its VT-4 tank boasts superior automation, mobility, and fire-control systems to Russia’s T-14 Armata (see: “Putin’s New ‘Wunderwaffe’: The World’s Deadliest Tank?” ). Additionally, the article claims that the VT-14s technology is in general more reliable than that of the T-14.

“The T-14′s transmission is not well-developed, as we saw through a malfunction taking place during a rehearsal before the May 9 parade,” a WeChat article, composed by Norinco, stated (The Diplomat reported on this incident. See: “Did the ‘World’s Deadliest Tank’ Just Break Down?”) “By comparison, the VT-4 has never encountered such problems so far. Our tanks also have world-class fire-control systems, which the Russians are still trying to catch up with,” according to Norinco.

Additionally the article emphasizes that the VT-4 is the economically more sensible choice: “Another important issue is the price – the T-14 is reported to have a price as high as that of the United States’ M1A2 Abrams. … Why don’t buyers consider Chinese tanks that have well-developed technologies and equipment as well as much-lower prices?” The lower price of the VT series is specifically designed to target the needs of militaries in developing countries.

Norinco also notes that in comparison to its Russian competition, it also can offer a much wider array of products. “Currently, Russia has only one new tank that is available for export – the T-90S. In contrast, we have the low-end VT-2, middle-end VT-1 as well as the high-end VT-4, covering the requirements of almost every client in the international market,” the company said.

The VT-2’s two major selling points are that it uses proven technology and that it is cheap. The VT-4, however, allegedly features the world’s latest tank warfare technology and can be compared to any modern third generation main battle tank like the U.S. M1A2 Abrams or Germany’s Leopard 2A6, according to Feng Yibai, chief designer of the VT-4.

The VT-4′s “main gun is a 125 m smoothbore that can fire various shells, including kinetic energy penetrators and high-explosive anti-tank warheads. It can fire anti-tank missiles with a maximum range of 5,000 meters,” China Daily notes.

Also, the VT-4 “has an advanced fire-control instrument, a new-type active protection system and a state-of-the-art, fully automatic transmission device,” he said. “In addition, the inter-unit network connects commanders of tanks and armored vehicles under a combat group, enabling them to share battlefield data in a real-time manner,” the WeChat article summarizes.

Any speculative comparison between the leading Chinese and Russian main battle tanks is in many ways premature and nonsensical; it has to be discarded as a mere clever marketing ploy to garner attention at this stage. Neither of the two tank programs have entered the mass-production phase yet and most of the current speculation is based on prototypes and the sparse public data available. Without rigorous testing it is virtually impossible to verify whether the VT-4 does display superior automation, mobility, and fire-control systems.

China has traditionally relied heavily in the development of its indigenous tank force on Russian license-built technology and know-how. Judging from publicly available images, the T-14 appears to have made a clear break with older Soviet legacy tank designs, whereas the VT-4 very much looks like an improved version of the T-90s. This is as far as any sensible unclassified analysis should go at this juncture.

According to the United Nations’ Register of Conventional Arms, China exported a total of 461 tanks from 1992 to 2013, whereas Russia sold 1,297 tanks during the same period. The United States is still the leading tank export of the world with 5,511 sales, followed by Germany with 2,680 exported armored fighting vehicles.

Back to bottling my Grenache
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
India Requires Russia, S. Korea to Partner With Local Firms in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Contest


NEW DELHI — India's Defence Ministry has decided that South Korea and Russia must partner with Indian firms in order to take part in its helicopter competition, despite offers of complete technology transfer, according to an MoD source.

South Korea is offering its Surion light utility helicopter (LUH) and Russia its Ka-226 machine. Russian President Vladimir Putin made the offer during his Dec. 11 visit to India.

"MoD's decision to buy LUH only through competition from domestic vendors is a virtual rejection of any government-to-government helicopter production deal between India and Russia," said defense analyst Nitin Mehta.

The MoD source, however, said the decision not to enter a joint program with either South Korea or Russia is part of a policy to boost the domestic private sector defense industry, and that the MoD would like to see partnerships for weapons programs with overseas companies.

After coming to power, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceled two global tenders for light utility helicopter purchases and approached the domestic companies to participate in the procurement of unspecified numbers of helicopters, either alone or in partnership with an overseas company.

India needs 440 LUHs to replace its aging Cheetah and Chetak helicopters used for reconnaissance and logistics in the high altitude battlefields in the Himalayas.

After the summit talks with Putin, Modi said in a statement: "I am pleased that Russia has offered to fully manufacture in India one of its most advanced helicopters. It includes the possibility of exports from India. It can be used for both military and civilian use. We will follow up on this quickly."

South Korea has also offered India full tech transfer of the Surion helicopter, the MoD source said. A diplomat from the South Korean Embassy in New Delhi confirmed that a proposal was been made to India in December, but gave no details.

In August, MoD canceled the 2012 tender for the purchase of 56 naval utility helicopters, in which Airbus Helicopters and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
were in the race.

In July, MoD canceled the 2008 global tender for the purchase of 197 light utility helicopters worth $1 billion, in which now Airbus Helicopters' AS550 was in competition with Russia's Ka-226T built by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

India's helicopter requirement is expected to grow to 600. In addition, the MoD also plans to procure 90 multirole helicopters worth $2.5 billion through the "Buy and Make (India)" route.

"Except for state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Limited [HAL], no private-sector defense major has ever produced a military helicopter," Mehta said. "But in the future, tie-ups are expected with overseas defense companies to tap the emerging helicopter market."

US-based Sikorsky and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
already have an agreement, and in October, Airbus Helicopters also announced a tie-up with the Tata to jointly produce Avro transport aircraft.


Back to bottling my Grenache
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
Chinese tank maker Norinco claims that its VT-4 is superior to Russia’s deadliest armored fighting vehicle.

Realistically , neither of those tanks is in operational service . T-14 is as yet unfinished, but it is a revolutionary concept of a tank with unmanned turret. VT-4 (MBT-3000) despite all the improvements is just a conventional tank with layout comparable to current generation .
If the Russians manage to complete T-14 , it would have advantage in armour protection and firepower . But MBT-3000 aims for export market, and I don't think Russia would allow export of Armata at least for few years . Therefore, real opponent to beat would be T-90MS , new modernized version of T-90 for foreign customers .
Btw, it is not exactly true that Russia doesn't have offer for low-end markets . T-72 is not in production anymore , but there are enough of these tanks stored in reserve that could be modernized and put to sale .
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Realistically , neither of those tanks is in operational service . T-14 is as yet unfinished, but it is a revolutionary concept of a tank with unmanned turret.
Hold up Hold up. It's not Revolutionary, T14 is just the First Tank to take it to production from start of the vehicle.
the concept and tech is established and Trialed.
M1 Tank Test bed from the 1980's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Polish PL01 Tank concept introduced in 2003
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Falcon Turret from Jordan 2003
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The Expeditionary tank form the early 1980's
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


VT-4 (MBT-3000) despite all the improvements is just a conventional tank with layout comparable to current generation
yet it should be noted that much of the basis for the Unmanned turret system is in VT-4 it's just taking it to that next level. also of note VT-4 vs T14 are more or less equals firepower, the Chinese might have a slight edge in fact as there guns tend to be longer. but at there base both are packing a 125mm smooth bore mated to a autoloader with a 12.7mm MG and a coaxial 7.62x54mm MG.

If the Russians manage to complete T-14 , it would have advantage in armour protection and firepower
yet at the cost of Situational awareness. that's the down side of unmanned turrets. by moving the crew into the armored capsule you remove them from the world around them.
But MBT-3000 aims for export market, and I don't think Russia would allow export of Armata at least for few years.
apt but in all likelihood VT-4 is just 2-3 years from fielding well Armata is not likely to hit the field till after 2020
 
Last edited:
Top