asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
Conversely, we could postulate absolutely anything if we defend it by saying that just because there is no evidence does not mean it did not happen. Here on SD, we should have more evidence that just hearsay and conjecture before we got too excited or too invested in something like this.
And that was my only point...that it is conjecture. No armor was seen...just transport ships. They could be carrying food and humanitarian supplies to Russia's ally.
IMHO, if thousands of tons or armor had been coming in...we would have more than this.
Of course you are free to believe whatever you want...that was not the point, and there is no desire to keep anyone form believing such things. I was simply making the point (once more) that is it conjecture and not based on any real evidence.
No I disagree
Last year UK authority's seized a Russian cargo ship carrying Mi-25 overhauled attack helos the serials were covered and although it is not against international law it was withheld and finally forced to turn back due to insurance violations I do not think UK authority's would make this news up and risk a diplomatic fall out over false allegations
Point here is that Russia is actively using military and civilian ships to transport weapons to Syria it has been reported by many news outlets Reuters ran a story about this last year I would suggest you google it and can no way pass as conjecture
Russia supply's arms to Syria that is been established, cargo ships transit turkish straits on 4-5 each month sometime more this can lead to only one conclusion that Russia is supplying Syria how else could Assad last this long he must have a weapons shuttle service from somewhere
Unless somehow I have missed 4-5 Russian naval excercises each month over the last 4 years there is no other mission for these cargo ships in the Mediterranean although this is very unlikely