So comfortably in excess of Mach 2.0 (for those interested, in the ball park of Mach 2.3-2.4 and change, depending on altitude).
Now for the really interesting part: can we infer from this that the infamous Mikhailov quote about the "speed requirement" being relaxed to Mach 2.0 on structural grounds was referring to supercruise rather than top speed after all? The original statement did not specify either way, though the journalists reporting added their own interpretation of it meaning one or the other, depending on which source you consulted. Generally, people tended to take it as referring to maximum dash speed in reheat.
But part of me was always wondering if he wasn't talking about supercruise. It did not seem to make sense that the Su-57, with many aspects of its configuration more strongly geared toward high-Mach performance and using the same sort of materials, would be slower in top speed than the F-22. At least not once it got its definitive engines.
If this thing was designed to cruise at Mach 2.0 in dry thrust though, that would certainly explain some of the more idiosyncratic design choices, first and foremost the hotly debated variable intakes. And it would make sense of Mikhailov's quote, because steady state cruise (as opposed to a transient dash without hitting thermal equilibrium) at that sort of speed would definitely push the temperature limits of composite materials.