Wait, on the soldier's plate carrier's upper right, isn't that the medal from last year's parade?New rifle spotted again. This time with a small rubber ring on the scope.View attachment 64535
Wait, on the soldier's plate carrier's upper right, isn't that the medal from last year's parade?New rifle spotted again. This time with a small rubber ring on the scope.View attachment 64535
This one has the new magazine, interesting.The tibetan pla has the new rifle now. Seems to be the dmr version.View attachment 64649
In other words, PLA not ready for the whole "Christmas tree" deal...View attachment 64948
One interesting fact: the 208th Institute originally designed rails on all 4 sides of the handguard (probably similar to HK-416), but the PLA rejected this idea, hence the current design.
In other words, PLA not ready for the whole "Christmas tree" deal...
Other military forces are moving away from quad rails too. Unnecessarily heavy, difficult on the hands (I too love holding cheesegraters for hours and hours), and more expensive to machine as well.
Their solution for the QBU-191 is a 12 o'clock rail with m-lok in other aspects, which is lighter, easier on the hands, and easier to machine than quad rail equivalent.
For standard QBZ-191, having a 12 o'clock rail and four smaller rail attachment points (i.e.: not permanent) on the handguard is more than sufficient as the standard infantry configuration imo.
If they want a more "SOF" version of QBZ-191, they can just adopt a shorter version of QBU-191's handguard.
Quad rails this day and age imo is just silly and costly, and if the PLA has any sense they will never adopt a quad rail handguard for QBZ-191...
They could adapt QBU-191 handguard, just make it shorter.
View attachment 64959
If they want a more "SOF" version of QBZ-191, they can just adopt a shorter version of QBU-191's handguard.