I think it's also because the rifle is simply a bit too short, especially its handguard.
If the gun, or at least its handguard is longer, that could lead to better, more comfortable handling.
Am I missing something? The QBZ-191's butt stock is adjustable for length, why does the handguard need to be longer?I disagree. the Rifle isn't fine, stop excusing the poor design, QBZ-95 and QBZ191 has poor ergonomics the Handguard is too short same goes for the QBZ-95. A assault rifle is not supposed to force you into holding the Iron Sight of the gun with your index finger touching the Iron Sight.
It's just uncomfortable and impractical that way.
There's plenty of rifles where you can't remove the irons.There's a really good reason you have adjustable Iron Sights it pertains to the users length and comfort to it's best. Almost every Modular Rifle allows you to remove the Iron Sight and displace it.
I am getting really tired of all these arguments as well, almost nothing posted in this thread is actually interesting anymore. Having differing opinions is one thing, actively instigating is another.Starts to get tired of all these arguments. Y'all have it almost everyday.
It's probably just due to the rifle's poor ergonomics, that's it.
As soldiers, they always need to work around equipments and eventually get used to it, it's common sense.