PLAN SCS Bases/Islands/Vessels (Not a Strategy Page)

Geographer

Junior Member
But they do have typhoons. So how do you protect your solar panels and wind turbines?
If you're not going to build wind turbines and solar panels because they'll get blown over during a typhoon, you might as well not build antennas, radars, or anything at all. At the point where the winds are blowing 100+ km/h, you've got bigger problems that maintaining the power supply, like why are people even on the island at that point? They should have been evacuated to the mainland well before the typhoon hits. In any case, typhoons a rare events.
 

joshuatree

Captain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




dw6hk1.jpg




Taiwan is making progress on its construction of a harbour on Taiping Island in the Spratly Islands, according to satellite imagery provided by Airbus Defence and Space and analysed by IHS Jane's .

The 6 August imagery shows land reclamation on the southwest tip of the island, which is also known as Itu Aba.

Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery dated 10 March and 18 April showed the building of a breakwater off the island's southwest corner that may be one element of the wharf. Since April the section behind the breakwater has been backfilled to create new land. At least four cranes are present on the new land, along with other construction vehicles.

A new breakwater has also been created and a channel dredged to the east of the new land. The 6 August imagery shows two roll-on/roll-off transport barges and at least one other vessel alongside in the channel. A blue-roofed support structure has also been built inland next to solar panels that were installed in 2012.

Taiwan's Coast Guard Administration (CGA) carried out a feasibility study for the construction of a wharf capable of handling 2,000-tonne frigates in 2013. The government has set aside USD110.24 million for the project, which is expected to be completed in 2015.

Taiping Island also has a 1,150 m-long and 30 m-wide runway, which was completed in early 2008. The CGA announced in 2013 that the Ministry of National Defence was considering expanding the runway, but no information has been released since then and satellite imagery shows no construction under way.

COMMENT
Taiwan's renewed interest in Taiping is in line with other countries that occupy features in the Spratly islands; all appear to be reinforcing their claims to the disputed islands by establishing larger footprints on the territories they hold.

In April the Republic of China Marine Corps conducted an amphibious landing drill on Taiping: its largest maritime drill in the Spratlys to date. Members of the Legislative Committee on Foreign Affairs and National Defense also recently called on the Ministry of National Defence (MND) to deploy the MIM-72J Sea Chaparral surface-to-air missiles (SAM) that it is withdrawing from naval service to replace existing SAM batteries on Taiping.

However, the MND has said it has not decided what to do with the Chaparral missiles.

The developments on Taiping also come as Taiwan's president has clarified the island's interpretation of the famous 9-dash-line, which first appeared on a Republic of China (RoC) map in 1947 and encompasses nearly the whole of the South China Sea.

It is also the basis of China's claims, but Beijing has refused to clarify whether the dashed line is a territorial boundary, a claim to all land features inside it, or merely a sphere of influence.

However, at a recent exhibition in Taipei of some of the archives that RoC leader Chiang Kai-shek and the Kuomintang (KMT) took to Taiwan when they fled to the island in 1949, President Ma Ying-jeou said that the 1947 map and claim was limited to islands and 3 to 12 n miles of their adjacent waters. There were "no other so-called claims to sea regions", he said.

There's disagreement on that last quoted
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Maybe something quoted out of context?
 

Geographer

Junior Member
Thanks for the new photo, joshuatree. I've been curious about Taiping's new port which has been in Taiwanese newspapers.

Regarding the intent of the nine-dashed line, I didn't realize there was an ambiguity. It is common sense that it refers to the islands within the line and associated EEZs rather than claiming the waters as Chinese territory. Even if Beijing stated this explicitly, how would that change the politics of the dispute? China is still going to enforce its maritime law in most of the South China Sea because most of the SCS is part of one of the islands' EEZ, and China says all the islands are its own. Thus you will still have Chinese coast guard ships enforcing Chinese maritime law near Vietnamese, Filipino, and Malaysian-occupied islands.
 

Geographer

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has an article on the Chinese land reclamation at Gavin Reef.

1569428_-_mian.jpg


IHS Jane's has obtained satellite imagery that further illustrates the extent of China's building of new islands in the Spratly Islands.

The latest image shows a new island on Gaven Reefs, known in the Philippines as the Burgos Reef, in Vietnam as Dá Ga Ven and Dá Lc and in China as Nanxun Jiao and Xinan Jiao.

China previously built a concrete platform that sat above the reef on its western side. This structure was fortified and housed anti-air and naval gun systems, along with communications equipment.

However, Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery dated 31 March and 7 August 2014 shows that between these two dates a channel was cut out of the centre of Gaven Reefs and the resultant rubble deposited to create a rectangular island that is about 300 m by 250 m. Along with a spit that leads to the channel, about 114,000 m 2 of new land has been created.
 

shen

Senior Member
Thanks for the new photo, joshuatree. I've been curious about Taiping's new port which has been in Taiwanese newspapers.

Regarding the intent of the nine-dashed line, I didn't realize there was an ambiguity. It is common sense that it refers to the islands within the line and associated EEZs rather than claiming the waters as Chinese territory. Even if Beijing stated this explicitly, how would that change the politics of the dispute? China is still going to enforce its maritime law in most of the South China Sea because most of the SCS is part of one of the islands' EEZ, and China says all the islands are its own. Thus you will still have Chinese coast guard ships enforcing Chinese maritime law near Vietnamese, Filipino, and Malaysian-occupied islands.

Islands that can't support life, ie islands that don't have natural fresh water source can't claim EEZ right?
 

Geographer

Junior Member
Islands that can't support life, ie islands that don't have natural fresh water source can't claim EEZ right?
Not exactly. The 1982 Law of the Sea is explicit that artificial islands do not get an EEZ. EEZs are also denied to tiny outcroppings that cannot support any economic activity. Permanent inhabitants and a fresh water source are not requirements.

Japan has stretched the meaning of "economic activity" to the absurb by putting a lighthouse on Okinotorishima, an atoll in the western Pacific Ocean with only a little rock above high tide. The Japanese government encased those rock outcroppings in cement to protect them from erosion. Japan claims an EEZ around those rocks but China disputes it.

There are enough natural islands in the SCS such that most of waters are in someone's EEZ. Don't forget that Vietnam's claim are just as aggressive as China's. Vietnam claims all of the Spratly and Paracel Islands and their EEZs. The Philippines claims nearly all the Spratly Islands.
 
Last edited:

shen

Senior Member
Not exactly. The 1982 Law of the Sea is explicit that artificial islands do not get an EEZ. EEZs are also denied to tiny outcroppings that cannot support any economic activity. Permanent inhabitants and a fresh water source are not requirements.

Japan has stretched the meaning of "economic activity" to the absurb by putting a lighthouse on Okinotorishima, an atoll in the western Pacific Ocean with only a little rock above high tide. The Japanese government encased those rock outcroppings in cement to protect them from erosion. Japan claims an EEZ around those rocks but China disputes it.

There are enough natural islands in the SCS such that most of waters are in someone's EEZ. Don't forget that Vietnam's claim are just as aggressive as China's. Vietnam claims all of the Spratly and Paracel Islands and their EEZs. The Philippines claims nearly all the Spratly Islands.

I guess the next dispute will be what is the definition of "artificial islands". :) I've read about the hypothesis that the motivation for the recent island building or reinforcement by China is a sign of shift in policy by China to claim EEZ around those "islands", combined by with the dispatch of the spy ship to Hawaii (tacit acceptance of American EEZ policy) are meant to separate the economy value of EEZ from American concern about freedom of navigation.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
A war will determine the ownership of islands .... from history, its always the case, ..... sooner or later. And time is with China, the longer the better for China. None of the country could compete with China in building artificial islands ... even if you combined all of them (including Taiwan). Let alone the navy
 

joshuatree

Captain
Not exactly. The 1982 Law of the Sea is explicit that artificial islands do not get an EEZ. EEZs are also denied to tiny outcroppings that cannot support any economic activity. Permanent inhabitants and a fresh water source are not requirements.

Japan has stretched the meaning of "economic activity" to the absurb by putting a lighthouse on Okinotorishima, an atoll in the western Pacific Ocean with only a little rock above high tide. The Japanese government encased those rock outcroppings in cement to protect them from erosion. Japan claims an EEZ around those rocks but China disputes it.

There are enough natural islands in the SCS such that most of waters are in someone's EEZ. Don't forget that Vietnam's claim are just as aggressive as China's. Vietnam claims all of the Spratly and Paracel Islands and their EEZs. The Philippines claims nearly all the Spratly Islands.

The natural ability to sustain human habitation is one criteria in qualifying for its own EEZ. That is why Taiping without a doubt has an EEZ. The other criteria is ambiguous, the ability to sustain economic activity. Too vague.


I guess the next dispute will be what is the definition of "artificial islands". :) I've read about the hypothesis that the motivation for the recent island building or reinforcement by China is a sign of shift in policy by China to claim EEZ around those "islands", combined by with the dispatch of the spy ship to Hawaii (tacit acceptance of American EEZ policy) are meant to separate the economy value of EEZ from American concern about freedom of navigation.

This hypothesis is more fear mongering by opponents in my opinion. I think the real reason for the island building is to better support fleet operations far from major bases. A mini base can still provide a means to replenish ships. Also, the artificial islands can help sustain a SCS ADIZ if it gets implemented. Last, if these artificial islands have passive sonar facilities, they will blunt sub ops in the SCS, such as Vietnam's sub program.

Since the U.N. subscribes to the One China policy as well as the U.S., there is nothing illegal about the artificial islands since they are all within Taiping's EEZ.
 
Top