The time for a war to conquer Taiwan has passed. There won't be an invasion. Taiwan is too puny.
I agree. But the credible threat must allways be there, just in case...
The time for a war to conquer Taiwan has passed. There won't be an invasion. Taiwan is too puny.
If they are not an ASW asset, then I don't see the need for 60 of them.
Iron Man was making a distinction between the early and conventional 056 and the later ASW version of 056A. It appears that you are not aware of the difference. The first 056A was commissioned in November 2014. There are currently at least 15 of them that have been launched/commissioned.
I'm aware. But what I wanted to say is that I'm not really clear what's the role of common Type 056? Surface patrol? There's Coast Guard for that. Surface combat- I don't see against who.
So, why they didn't made them all for ASW?
I don't think so.
Why?
Because, if they are on so high place on list, probably the PLAN would allready build at least one of them. But they didn't.
Also, PLAN currently has two most important tasks:
a) win in any fight around Taiwan and sucessfully make invasion on Taiwan. For that, you don't need LHD. LPDs like Type 071, LSTs, LCAC and helicopters are more than enough. LHD is just big juicy target in Taiwan Strait.
b) support Chinese naval/political program in the SCS. They don't need LHD for that. Sure, it would be handy to have them, but not so important, they can do the trick with LPDs and LSTs.
One day in future, PLAN will need them to serve the same role as in USN, as core of Chinese amphibious operations in far-away regions ( Indian ocean etc. ). But, without a carrier support, against any semi-capable foe, LHD is just big juicy target. So, until China doesen't build at least 3 carriers ( so that they can have one deployed in Indian Ocean or somewhere else far away from China ), China has no big need for LHDs.
LPD is huge logistic asset in this case. Somewhat large&vulnerable for comfort, but nevertheless extremely useful.LPDs are useful but LHDs are big targets? They are pretty the same in terms of general size and defensive capabilities. Either you can defend both, or you can defend neither.
Yes but that'd also mean a predictable approach vector, a respectable amphibious strike group would pose a different level of threat to, say, Taiwan.LPD is huge logistic asset in this case. Somewhat large&vulnerable for comfort, but nevertheless extremely useful.
Taiwan itself is procuring one, for a reason.
All LHD functions in strait can be performed from mainland and isles: it's not especially far. Perhaps most importantly, mainland reliably won't get sunk.
Yes but that'd also mean a predictable approach vector, a respectable amphibious strike group would pose a different level of threat to, say, Taiwan.
Of course, not necessary would it mean that the Z-20 will replace all Z-9 airframe immediately, probably we can expect some Z-9s that still has good amount of airframe lifespan would be re-assigned to other roles. But I don't expect that to happen before 2020, somewhere near mid-2020s is my estimation.
i specifically lined "in strait".Yes but that'd also mean a predictable approach vector, a respectable amphibious strike group would pose a different level of threat to, say, Taiwan.
PLAN LHD that could also function as the central nexus for anti-sub surface group