yuxiaochen
Junior Member
Yea something like that.What is the first one? Is it just a 630 with fancy cover?
Yea something like that.What is the first one? Is it just a 630 with fancy cover?
What is the first one? Is it just a 630 with fancy cover?
30mm discarding sabot rounds... The second image shows petal separation.
I dont understand why PLAN is not interested in Rheinmetall 35mm ahead type of CIWS. PLA has Oerlikon 35mm in its inventory.
I dont understand why PLAN is not interested in Rheinmetall 35mm ahead type of CIWS. PLA has Oerlikon 35mm in its inventory.
While i do see the point of PLAN upping from 7 barrels to 11 barrels to increase ROF, also the change of Soviet explosive rounds to tungsten sabots. The airburst still has alot of merits against UAV or anything not Super/hypersonic.Because the PLAN has supersonic and hypersonic AShMs to pitch it’s defence systems against.
Against a supersonic or hypersonic missile, at CIWS ranges of 1-2km, airburst isn’t going to cut the mustard, as the damaged missile is still going to almost certainly strike your ship due to its velocity and momentum, and hit hard enough to cause massive damage, even if you do pepper it full of shrapnel.
PLAN CIWS philosophy is to hit incoming missiles with so much force so quickly that the missile is literally shredded into confetti, and any debris that does strike ships is so small as to unlikely to cause much in the way of damage. Hence their choice of 30mm over the American 20mm Phalanx, and the frankly incredible RoF of 10k+ rounds per minute.
Its a similar approach as what the Russians have gone with BTW, and since those are the only two nations with operational supersonic AShMs and enough domestic know-how to develop anything they want, I would be inclined to trust their judgement on this.
While i do see the point of PLAN upping from 7 barrels to 11 barrels to increase ROF, also the change of Soviet explosive rounds to tungsten sabots. The airburst still has alot of merits against UAV or anything not Super/hypersonic.