Oh, there is no doubt the US is a hypocrite on many things; this is not a point anyone is arguing.
LOL what? It's one thing to say that strong countries will do what they like regardless of what they say, it's another thing entirely to act hypocritically and then claim that you are NOT acting hypocritically. Being consistent in demanding that someone stop what they are doing but continuing to do the same thing yourself is the very definition of hypocrisy and inconsistency. How in the world is this "quite consistent"??? ROFLMAO
Look, I'm not saying that large countries won't do whatever they want to do and say whatever they want to say, whether their words and deeds are consistent or not. This should already be established as fact, a fact that is as old as civilizations have been around. What I'm talking about is the feelings of people on forums like this one, where people are so easily butthurt that China's "sovereignty" is being "violated" by US spy ships and spy planes on a routine basis, typically based on some kind of moralistic or legalistic justification. If these same people don't have a problem with China "violating" some other country's "sovereignty", then why are they whining so hard about the US? No need to whine and act the hypocrite. Get stronger and then do something about it; until then STFU, because no one cares what a hypocrite says. That is all.
Oh, there is no doubt the US is a hypocrite on many things; this is not a point anyone is arguing.
Good, at least one thing is unequivocally acknowledged LoL.
China has been consistent in demanding US to stop survalillence in her EEZ. She didn't say she will not do so unilaterally. Quite consistent I'd say.
LOL what? It's one thing to say that strong countries will do what they like regardless of what they say, it's another thing entirely to act hypocritically and then claim that you are NOT acting hypocritically. Being consistent in demanding that someone stop what they are doing but continuing to do the same thing yourself is the very definition of hypocrisy and inconsistency. How in the world is this "quite consistent"??? ROFLMAO
LoL you are falling all over your own words without paying much attention to what I clearly said in what I said.
Consistent here is as in compatible or in agreement with something.
So you tell me if the following 3 sentences are not compatible or in conflict with each other.
1)China has been consistent in demanding US to stop survalillence in her EEZ.
2)She didn't say she will not do so unilaterally.
3)Quite consistent I'd say.
China's demand on US is bilateral, she is not proselytizing this position all over the world, at least not yet. So China is doing it herself while US is doing it to the maximum possible extent within the circumstances is not in conflict of 1) given 2). It is logical and consistent and coherent.
Where TF did you pull out hypocrisy and inconsistency ? Where you cannot see? ROFLMAO
Look, I'm not saying that large countries won't do whatever they want to do and say whatever they want to say, whether their words and deeds are consistent or not. This should already be established as fact, a fact that is as old as civilizations have been around. What I'm talking about is the feelings of people on forums like this one, where people are so easily butthurt that China's "sovereignty" is being "violated" by US spy ships and spy planes on a routine basis, typically based on some kind of moralistic or legalistic justification. If these same people don't have a problem with China "violating" some other country's "sovereignty", then why are they whining so hard about the US? No need to whine and act the hypocrite. Get stronger and then do something about it; until then STFU, because no one cares what a hypocrite says. That is all.
US doesn't shut TFU FFS, so who do you think you are to ask people to STFU LoL.
If you don't like it, I'd suggest you should STFU for all I care LoL
It could have been much juicier, as I lost the first one I was trying to post LoL
