PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

latenlazy

Brigadier
In the context of conflict once again erupting in the Middle East.
“天下大乱,形势大好。”
“Everything under the heavens is in chaos, conditions are excellent."
There has not been a better time to go ahead with reunification since 1949.
Nah, the more the US looks incapable of following through on its security guarantee the less China needs to pull the trigger. They can also read the situation in Taiwan. Just increase the pressure while offering a way out more eagerly.
 

4Tran

New Member
Registered Member
In the context of conflict once again erupting in the Middle East.
“天下大乱,形势大好。”
“Everything under the heavens is in chaos, conditions are excellent."
There has not been a better time to go ahead with reunification since 1949.
The main issue is that China doesn't want to unite Taiwan using force. The political fallout has never been worth the political and military gains. For all the ongoing gnashing of "Will the PLA attack Taiwan?", the answer has always been "no" unless and until a red line has been crossed. Xi Jinping would be a fool to launch an attack; especially since every year increases China's advantages in-theater.
 

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
Nah, the more the US looks incapable of following through on its security guarantee the less China needs to pull the trigger. They can also read the situation in Taiwan. Just increase the pressure while offering a way out more eagerly.
The main issue is that China doesn't want to unite Taiwan using force. The political fallout has never been worth the political and military gains. For all the ongoing gnashing of "Will the PLA attack Taiwan?", the answer has always been "no" unless and until a red line has been crossed. Xi Jinping would be a fool to launch an attack; especially since every year increases China's advantages in-theater.
Peaceful or violent, the means do not matter so much as the result. Plenty of levers to pull when the US is overextended due to their economics and military commitments. The one thing I will fundamentally disagree with is another "One country two systems" scheme a la Hong Kong.
 

4Tran

New Member
Registered Member
Peaceful or violent, the means do not matter so much as the result. Plenty of levers to pull when the US is overextended due to their economics and military commitments. The one thing I will fundamentally disagree with is another "One country two systems" scheme a la Hong Kong.
You can think of it in terms of games theory values. A war would be a -3 outcome, the status quo is +1 (because the conditions become ever more favorable), and a peaceful reunification is +10.
 

montyp165

Senior Member
I don't see why Taidong would be more logistically difficult than Tainan. It's not the 50s anymore, the PLAN isn't mostly composed of fishing boats. The main issue with choosing Taidong is that the deeper waters would allow for US submarine activity not dissimilar to that of WWII.
If the PLAN has the necessary tools in place it can effectively cauldron the USN sub force to the effect of the 1943 Battle of the Atlantic, and it may not be that far off even if it isn't at present.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
There's no way to paint this situation as one where getting more ASML would be helpful to China. The question is simple: do you treat drug withdrawal by putting the patient on more drugs, especially when the patient is making visible progress against addiction?
Chinese fabs are already used to ASML DUV machines and we see machines stockpiled in China for future expansion.
There's a countdown on that clock and that's the urgency. When that countdown stops or goes back up, people relax.
But all the Chinese fabs know that even if they get continued access to ASML DUV machines, there's no guarantee that they won't be sanctioned. At a minimum, we will still see Huawei and SMIC continue to work with the manufacturers to improve domestic DUV machines.
You'd be surprised at corporate desperation and greed. Desperation drove them to make the fastest progress on the planet at the most difficult technology there is. Greed will make them put that project on the backburner to chase easy fast profits now with ASML's machines.
My guess is that domestic DUV machines are currently useable, but they still need a few years to work out the bugs, scale up production, and come up with a more polished version.
Good. That means that if we use them for everything, they debug faster. You wanna learn a language in no time, put yourself in a society where no one speaks your native tongue. If we put ASML as the primary use and our native machines as a backup project, they debug slower, so slow that they can fall behind, become hopeless, and discarded. Don't forget, every dollar you pay ASML is money injected into their system to make them innovate faster and that's a dollar taken away from Chinese systems' developmental funds. It's double trouble to buy ASML when you have any local machines that are usable at all.
And if EUV machines become available today? I do think Chinese fabs should buy as many as they need.
As I said above, corporate greed needs to be stopped and desperation needs to continue in pursuit of our own indigenous line. There is no half-assing it.
That doesn't stop Huawei or SMIC trying to get domestic EUV machines ready, as they know more sanctions are coming.
Yeah, but how desperate and how fast? There is no possible way that the same amount of energy gets put into domestic lithography after foreign ones get injected, even though they say they will at first. The best way, the fastest way, is to keep Chinese lithography at the state of fighting with one's back to a cliff/river. The Manhattan Project would have been heavily delayed (though nuclear weapons research would still continue slower) if WWII turned into a negotiation and the front lines cooled. This is China's Manhattan Project. Hostilities must remain until we achieve total victory.
 

lcloo

Major
As a military planner you should look at your weakness as much as your strength. If anti-submarine warfare is PLAN's biggest weakness, then they would have developed and strengthen on this sector. And they actually have done quite a lot, as seen in some exhibition info they showed many years earlier. There is no lack of information on this but few such news surfaced recently than in older says.

Opsec on your actually strength works against your enemy when they thought they are superior and no harm will come to them. J10C proved than you don't need grandious advertisement to win a battle. If advertisement and propangada works Rafales would have knock down dozens of J10C.

Keep your strength at unknown status, and wipe out the enemy in their full surprises when they decided to come to fight. Same case for PLAN's underwater weapon platforms, not just the SSK and SSN, there are more than just submarines under the sea.
 

Wrought

Senior Member
Registered Member
anyone here familiar with the recent taiwan regional politics? (maybe not recent, i never actually follow it much in the first place).

there's this famous streamer called "guan zhang" who I thought was very very anti-mainland many years ago, is suddenly behaving the complete opposite and scolding the DPP nonstop, and is travelling in the mainland now.

The DPP in general, is also getting super unpopular among almost everyone, (might be happening for some time now, as I said I didnt follow much for a very long time)

Anyone know what is going on?


and what does the term “Qing Niao/青鳥" means? I'm very much out of the loop.

青鳥行動 refers to youth protests last year.
 
Top