PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
My dad said that the PLA wouldn't need to prepare or mobilize much for this operation, because they already secretly stationed troops and assets in Fujian.

Though I still think they'll still need to mobilize their naval assets, but I'm guessing for the first few amphibious landing and blockade, they'll use commercial and civilian fishing boats to quickly establish a beachhead and harass/blockade any foreign ships from intervening.

No. There is no way they can hide that many people from social media/satellites, not even in a military culture as secrecy obsessed as the PLA.
 

Coalescence

Senior Member
Registered Member
No. There is no way they can hide that many people from social media/satellites, not even in a military culture as secrecy obsessed as the PLA.
Could a secret underground tunnel like what Iran made help hide those assets and cut the time it takes to mobilize? But anyways, another user here have pointed that China already has multiple amphibious forces stationed on the coast for Taiwan, but I don't know if its enough for the entire operation.
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
Hi everyone. I'm a white American here who is curious about Chinese culture and military strategy. Recently, I read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by scholar Harlan Ullman arguing that the PLA is unable to take Taiwan given its current capacity, nor will they be in the foreseeable future. I'll quote the relevant part of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in full,




The three-to-one ratio apparently refers to a common ratio taught in military schools. The author explains,



I'm curious what people here have to say about this article. I asked a friend who knew more about PLA strategy and they said something like "simple ratios are totally obsolete in modern warfare." But I never went to a military academy, so I'm completely clueless here.
As the others said, Taiwan can not field 450,000 people to defend itself. Its proper combat force is around 35,000 with extra 30,000 in light brigades. Since conscription existed until now, it theoretically has a few million to mobilize but equipment and enough officers simply do not exist. I don't think they would be able to sustain a 450,000 men combat force considering it means at least 300,000 more to supply them.

Force ratios are a myth. There are a lot of instances of smaller forces defeating larger ones even while attacking way back into antiquity.

Taiwan is not an easy task indeed. It is a stronger country (even though it officially doesn't exist) than many Eastern European NATO members. But it is not something China couldn't handle especially if there is no US intervention.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
As the others said, Taiwan can not field 450,000 people to defend itself. Its proper combat force is around 35,000 with extra 30,000 in light brigades. Since conscription existed until now, it theoretically has a few million to mobilize but equipment and enough officers simply do not exist. I don't think they would be able to sustain a 450,000 men combat force considering it means at least 300,000 more to supply them.

Force ratios are a myth. There are a lot of instances of smaller forces defeating larger ones even while attacking way back into antiquity.

Taiwan is not an easy task indeed. It is a stronger country (even though it officially doesn't exist) than many Eastern European NATO members. But it is not something China couldn't handle especially if there is no US intervention.

In many aspects Taiwan's military is technologically superior to Ukraine but the morale of the troops is not the best. Soldier training under DPP has been very risk averse and conscription time has been cut down drastically due to popular sentiments. In an article I've read by a conservative American blogger with contacts in Taiwan some of the artillery units have not done live fire training during the duration of their service, like at all... This is pretty unthinkable for a military facing a threat as big as that of mainland China.
 

Coalescence

Senior Member
Registered Member
With Starlink, Internet will still be available unless PLA can jam thousand starlink sats
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Starlink needs those satellite dish on the ground to work, and I think you could scramble those signal using EW. Either way weapons are being developed to destroy and disable them easily, I think there's one being developed in the US, using a powerful microwave beam.
 

Coalescence

Senior Member
Registered Member
Starlink needs those satellite dish on the ground to work, and I think you could scramble those signal using EW. Either way weapons are being developed to destroy and disable them easily, I think there's one being developed in the US, using a powerful microwave beam.
Off-topic, but what do you guys think of the possibilities that international laws may get enacted in the future to enforce cyber-sovereignty? Would countries claim that other countries cannot encroach on their airwaves, by threatening to fry or destroy satellites unlawfully transmitting signals in the territory and have receiver dishes built to constantly looking out for illegal transmission?
 
Top