PLA Small arms
- Thread starter Vanguard1688
- Start date
How common are aftermarket scopes for the PAP compared to the PLA?
I wanna ask you since you were part of the PAP before, maybe you know something.
For the vast majority of units, only standardized scopes can be used for financial and management reasons
Can you give me a list of the standardized scopes? Are they all Chinese or are there foreign ones mixed in as well?
Sorry, bro, we're not allowed to take pictures of the equipment list, and there are only Chinese products on the equipment list。
Oh okay, that's understandable. We all don't want to get arrested, after all.
Hi,
if it’s not too much for you to reveal, what’s the parameter wise scopes Chinese are using against
the USA and western equipment, like are they latest generation as compare to other counterparts
or still some miles to catch with western equipment.
if it’s possible for you to answer
thank you
The sniper scopes issued for our high precision sniper rifles aren’t very user-friendly. Given the large size of the military and budget constraints, they’re supplied merely to meet basic availability requirements. Units with the means will purchase third-party scopes on the commercial market or spend heavily to import European or American sniper optics. The standard QMQ171 holographic sight also only serves to fill the basic availability gap and still doesn’t match the performance of an EOTECH. In our view, the most effective options are the new QMH191/192 thermal imaging sights, digital night vision scopes, and the QMK171.
Would you mind giving me details on the difference between the QMQ171 and the EOTECH? How does the EOTECH outperform the QMQ171?
