Where did you find this line from 席亚洲? I just checked Weibo, and it says "@席亚洲" account is not viewable for violating some rules.
That's a bilibili account, not weibo
Where did you find this line from 席亚洲? I just checked Weibo, and it says "@席亚洲" account is not viewable for violating some rules.
it's likely. Hard to tell conclusively from this photo, but covered shape on top is also quite similar to some known historical MBT chassis prototypes(weight simulator).View attachment 169726
That said, Xiyazhou is implying this may actually be a heavier chassis for a true MBT class vehicle.
Offtop - historically true, but ukraine experience suggests it damn does, and it's higher priority than even range.We kinda already have that, and the SPG probably won’t need the thick side skirt armor:
That’s why if you squint hard enough, it’s really the type-100 fire support vehicle chassis without the side armor. Note the similar road wheel arrangement, albeit also using the different road wheels and double pin tracks set up like the heavy mbt chassis, the placement of the unique exhaust port (one big exhaust above 2 small exhaust) above and slightly in front of the second road wheel. To me it seems to be parts of the same family at least. But we digress. Pictures for comparison:That has been said to be an export vehicle. It makes alot more sense to standardise the Type 100 chassis for domestic service.




I believe that's a 96A with APS.
I believe that's a 96A with APS.