PLA Navy news, pics and videos

Cloud_Nine_

Junior Member
Registered Member
Granted some of those especially the HQ-16 VLS is not very comparable to mk41.
Mk41 is not very comparable to HT-1 either. VLS counting is just a penile measuring contest alive and well in naval tradition :)

Also USN is doing its level best to reduce VLS count to meet PLAN halfway too lol. Ticos retiring is taking huge chunks out of its total count while DDG(X) continue to not be a thing. Flight III will pretty much be the only source of reliable income at about 1~1.5 hulls per year. Constellations at this point are almost 3~4 years late while only providing 32 per hull and a rate of production no greater than single hull per year either.

Not to mention the upcoming wave of Burke retirements, delayed by making some Burkes serve an extra five years, but wouldnt matter either way if USN can't fill in with new ships fast.
 
Last edited:

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
You forgot to include SK, Japan and EU's VLS. They are all US property.
Not to derail the discussion but the issues with a decentralised empire that has independent warlords is that those warlords tend to take their armies and run the moment the emperor's army starts struggling. Hence, rather unreliable and it is better to compare forces 1 on 1 within a theater.
 
Top