They are just practicing to put on a special Double 10 airshow for cross-straits compatriots or something I'm sure.View attachment 77916
Oof, that's a spicy meat ball
12 H6 X 6 long range anti-ship missiles = 72 missiles against an "imagined opponent" fleet of 3 aircraft carriers. Backed up by AEW&C and lots of J-16.View attachment 77916
Oof, that's a spicy meat ball
I've noticed the count in recent day is make up of disproportionationate number of J-16. I recall previously it was a more even spread of J-10, J-11B, J-16, H-6 and Y-8. There was one day were there was even a J-7.
Could this be some J-16D mixed in and disguising themselves as multiple J-16 each?
not all of them - stupid medias don't know the difference,Meanwhile the western media are playing out that Mianland China is sending large numbers of military aircraft "into Taiwan AIR SPACE" rather than provide accurate news on Air Defence IDENTIFICATION Zone.
Why risk using costly J-7?That's interesting. Imagine hundreds of J-7s flying over Taiwan airspace, it would overload their air defense system. Old technology has its advantages.
Why risk using costly J-7?
IMO it would far more cost effective to swarm the sky with cheap drones and use them to strike important military targets (radars, anti-air, HQ, airbases)
Old and Decommisoned J7's current value is close to a few thousand dollars. They are going to scrap yard or museum or use as target for live fire exercises. Using them as cheap decoy drones to draw enemy's expensive anti-aircraft missiles does sound logical.Why risk using costly J-7?
IMO it would far more cost effective to swarm the sky with cheap drones and use them to strike important military targets (radars, anti-air, HQ, airbases)