Well it seems that contrary to your claims, the 054A is doing just fine way out past even the Second Island Chain, in the middle of the ME. It seems that dozens of them have been doing pretty well over the last several years. So while it may strike you as odd, you have provided no evidence at all that 054As are unsuited for long distance deployments.I didn't say you shouldn't build or make use of overseas bases, only that you can't base your force structure and military strategy around having them. If you could then the US Navy could just about dispense with its aircraft carriers, which it very sensibly does not.
Good question. I don't have enough information to provide a definite answer, and nor does anyone else so far as I am aware. It would strike me as odd, however, if PLAN's first modern blue water frigate, designed in the very early stages of the 21st century when PLAN was still overwhelming focused on operations within the first island chain, in fact turned out to be ideally suited not only for operations in the second island chain and eastern IOR, but deployments even further afield.
I get it. You like to think outside the box and leave the linear-thinkers behind in the dust. Unfortunately I just don't think there is a place for your 6,000t super-frigate to squeeze in between a 4,500-5,000t 054B and a 7,500-8,000t 052E, not to mention you will have gone from a two-tier ORBAT straight into a four-tier(!) ORBAT, which would seem to be a dramatic reversal of your previous conception of the future PLAN ORBAT. In any case, I'm guessing the PLAN is going to be way too linear for your tastes for the next few decades.My first post in this discussion was clear and unambiguous: "Distinct from my previous conception whereby a 6000-ton frigate replaced the 054-series in production, I think a 6000-ton frigate could have a role in a future PLAN..."
Obviously my previous conception has been rendered invalid, at least for the moment, by developments regarding 054B and 052E. The possibility space evolves. I am not here to issue dogmatic proclamations about what PLAN will look like in future, merely to illustrate that the range of what it could plausibly look like is broader than is assumed by the linear extrapolations from the present that many are so fond of.
Obviously tonnage is an index of capability and not itself the characteristic of interest. Nonetheless, it is a good guide. If you want to put more capability on the 056 hull without sacrificing other qualities, then it is going to get bigger. If you want to increase range and endurance on top of that, it will get bigger again. These are reliable relationships.
Last edited: