PLA Ground Forces news, pics and videos

PiSigma

"the engineer"
sorry I didnt realize it had propellers, I guess I also didnt hear about that time xi purged 191s from the service so the plagf, or that the j15 exists but isnt used because it also got purged, or else how could you even explain the cover image of this threat assessment updated this month?
Propellers are on the inside duh. Don't you know China is a million years behind US on engine technology?
 

Clango

Junior Member
Registered Member
sorry I didnt realize it had propellers, I guess I also didnt hear about that time xi purged 191s from the service so the plagf, or that the j15 exists but isnt used because it also got purged, or else how could you even explain the cover image of this threat assessment updated this month?
It's got a whole bunch of props inside the engines wdym
 

James Zhen

New Member
Registered Member
View attachment 173724Not including the type 100, type 99b, having outdated equipment on the cover page and listing a J-35 as a Transport helicopter???? doesn't exactly make me trust this document, they also include retired aircraft and neglect to mention 4.5 gen aircraft. It all just seems deeply questionable for a document from this month, a complete exclusion of UGVs seems strange. Even if you argue from a standpoint of total adoption that still leaves the question of the extremely obvious gear exclusion that you wouldnt see anywhere, much less Taiwan. View attachment 173725
To be fair, this document most likely took months to make, prior to the reveal newer assets. At least TRADOC finally stopped calling the ZBD-04A as the Type 97 IFV lmao.
 

dripblackcoffee

New Member
Registered Member
To be fair, this document most likely took months to make, prior to the reveal newer assets. At least TRADOC finally stopped calling the ZBD-04A as the Type 97 IFV lmao.
I mean its one thing to take a while to make but i think it just has too many inexcusable mistakes, esp that cover image
 
Top