PLA Anti-Air Missile (SAM) systems

Kich

Junior Member
Registered Member
More information on the FK-3000 air defense system. It's designed for point defense against helicopters, precision guided munitions, UAVs, drone swarms, etc. It has two components: the larger manned vehicle and up to two companion unmanned vehicles. The manned vehicle carries missiles to intercept guided munitions, aircraft, and drone swarms. It also carries a single 30mm AA gun and drone jammers. For added firepower against drone swarms, two companion unmanned vehicle can be added, with each carrying additional missiles. Going by the images, the larger FK-3000/L missile is for intercepting helicopters and large UAVs, and the smaller FK-3000/S is for intercepting guided munitions, small UAVs, and drone swarms.

52495664316_371f273de3_3k.jpg
52496219503_3417d293c8_k.jpg
52495664216_decbf5fbc8_k.jpg

52481345603_4370c28843_k.jpg
52494117265_a34b4448c4_3k.jpg
Russia could really use this in Ukraine.
 

Hitomi

Junior Member
Registered Member
Don't know too much about SAM systems. Someone correct me if this is wrong.

H-17 short range
HQ-16 mid range
HQ-22 mid range
HQ-9 Long range

HQ-11 ??
FK-3000 ?? Is that for only for export?

Are there any other PLA mobile SAM systems that I'm missing?
HQ-11 apparently supersedes the HQ-6 short range missile system used mainly by the PLAAF.
 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
A HQ-16 re-supply vehicle does what it's designed to do.

53383694226_5cde2daef1_h.jpg
53384128030_ebcac24d59_h.jpg
53383694246_af0c6299b3_h.jpg
53382772227_2b8cca188c_h.jpg
I wonder why they don't move towards a containerised system where all missiles are reloaded at once, is it because the larger missiles are too heavy? Granted if you're not intended on firing all missiles in training exercises, reloading individual missiles would be more cost effective.
 

by78

General
I wonder why they don't move towards a containerised system where all missiles are reloaded at once, is it because the larger missiles are too heavy? Granted if you're not intended on firing all missiles in training exercises, reloading individual missiles would be more cost effective.

Isn't this already a containerized system? Each missile is sealed in a cylinder at the factory, and three cylinders are bundled together in a metal frame container, and each TEL carries up to two frame containers. This is effectively a containerized system.
 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
Isn't this already a containerized system? Each missile is sealed in a cylinder at the factory, and three cylinders are bundled together in a metal frame container, and each TEL carries up to two frame containers. This is effectively a containerized system.
True, I guess reloading 6 at a time is probably asking too much, my query would be more appropriate towards hq-9s.
 

by78

General
An export-oriented mobile air defense system against low- and ultra-low-altitude targets. Fully automated search, track, and fire control enables rapid response. Capable of cooperative engagement. Six launcher vehicles can form an area air defense network with high firing density. The system can be fitted onto existing armor vehicles or light vehicles.

53464787433_8d30637b47_k.jpg
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
An export-oriented mobile air defense system against low- and ultra-low-altitude targets. Fully automated search, track, and fire control enables rapid response. Capable of cooperative engagement. Six launcher vehicles can form an area air defense network with high firing density. The system can be fitted onto existing armor vehicles or light vehicles.

53464787433_8d30637b47_k.jpg
So Top Gun Maverick won't be able to do the mission then with this SAM? ;) :rolleyes:
 
Top