So the export version FK-3 has a 100km range, while the PLA version has a 170km range?170km
So the export version FK-3 has a 100km range, while the PLA version has a 170km range?170km
Not sure about fk3 but 170km for pla is apparently what some websites claim. Can anyone confirm?So the export version FK-3 has a 100km range, while the PLA version has a 170km range?
So basically China currently has 3 tiers of modern AAMs
Long range:
HQ-9 / HHQ-9 naval versions / FD2000 export version (300+km,41km)
HQ-22 / KS-1 / FK-3 export version (170km,27km)
Low-medium range:
DK-10A / Sky Dragon 50 / PL-12 (50km,20km)
HQ-16 / HHQ-16 naval versions / LY-80 export version (40km,18km)
Low range:
LY-60 / FD-60 / PL10 / PL11 (18km,12km)
HQ-10 / FL3000 (9km,6km)
TY-90
Are there any that I missed out? Some questions:
Is the LY-60 considered a replacement for the HQ-7?
Is there a missile being developed for quadpacking? The naval side seems a bit lacking compared to Western quadpackable missiles like ESSM, CAMM
There is talk about the 5-5-5 quad packed missile, which stands for Mach 5, 50 kilometers, not sure what the other 5 is, but it could be 5km height.
LY-60 is dead product. I think that's the export version of HQ-61, which was installed on the Jiangwei 053H1 to H2, and by the H3, it was replaced by HQ-7.
You also forgot to add HQ-17 on the list for short range. HQ-17 appears to be on the gradual replacement of HQ-7.
DK-10A aka Skydragon 50 is the one supposed to be quad packed. But for some reason it is not accepted by the PLAN. Skydragon 50 remains to be an export product only where it has already has some installed customers.
There is talk about the 5-5-5 quad packed missile, which stands for Mach 5, 50 kilometers, not sure what the other 5 is, but it could be 5km height.
Seems like for all ranges PLA is going to have modern versions soon (HQ-9C for long range, 555 missile for medium range, HQ-17 or FM2000 for short range).LY-60 is dead product. I think that's the export version of HQ-61, which was installed on the Jiangwei 053H1 to H2, and by the H3, it was replaced by HQ-7.
You also forgot to add HQ-17 on the list for short range. HQ-17 appears to be on the gradual replacement of HQ-7.
DK-10A aka Skydragon 50 is the one supposed to be quad packed. But for some reason it is not accepted by the PLAN. Skydragon 50 remains to be an export product only where it has already has some installed customers.
There is talk about the 5-5-5 quad packed missile, which stands for Mach 5, 50 kilometers, not sure what the other 5 is, but it could be 5km height.
Some questions about the HQ-17 short range SAM:
1. Some websites claim that the HQ-17A wheeled version carries 16 missiles while the HQ-17 tracked version only carries 8. Is that true? I find it hard to believe given their small size difference
2. For both the wheeled HQ-17A and tracked HQ-17, do the missiles extend beyond the top cab with the radars?
I was under the impression that the top cab can spin around to direct its front tracking radar, but seeing the length of the missile in this photo, it seems impossible not to extend into the vehicle itself
Thanks for that clarification.Yes, the missile does extend into the vehicle itself. Pay attention to the missile containers in loading. The number of missiles is restricted by the width of the turret basket due to the need of fitting the rear part of the missile into the vehicle.
As for the HQ-17A having 16 missiles instead of 8, I did read some news/ rumors (closer to rumors I say) about Russian Tor getting new and more compact missiles that increases its missile capacity from 8 to 16. Since HQ-17 and its development is a branch of Russian Tor, maybe that's where the claim comes from?