There is no direct equivalent, but there is coverage of similar threat set. Indirectly it's S-300V4 (army AD) and S-500 (airforce ADF), as both do terminal theater ABM; so does the older S-400/S-300PMU, in very high numbers but in a relatively limited manner.
Moreover, Buk-M3 (through 9M83) and S-350 (9M96 series are something of a much larger PAC-3MSE, trying to sit everywhere) have backup ABM capabilities.
As such, there is ABM/hypersonic intercept capability across the board; it isn't as specialized, as systems are tasked with air defense on equal footing. Which is sensible, theater ballistic threat to Russia was/is relatively limited; air threat, on the other hand, is extreme.
Making summary on Russian AD is not that much easier than on Chinese one.
Overall, much like in China, there are two subsets: army AD("PVO SV"), airforce ADF("ZRV VKS"). First is tasked with protecting field army, second one does home defense. Army AD was lucky to switch SAM generations in mid-2010s; it's the smaller service. Airforce, while well supplied with S-400s, got a completely new generation of SAMs(S-350/500) right on the brink of war (2021-2023). We don't really know what's the progress with their production.
For army air defenses , that's primarily through S-300V4 units(theater ABM and AD, only 1 oversized unit per military district), followed by Buk-M3 units (which also now normally incorporate 9M83 gladiator launchers, i.e. smaller missiles from S-300V). Integrated structure allows Buks(both M2 and M3) engage tactical ballistic missiles as well, but this is secondary capability set.
Tor-M2(Tor-M2A), Pantsir-SA and now Pantsir-sm-sv form the modern inner layer (together with whole plethora of other dated, current and future army shorads). Due to extreme value of SHORADS, it appears most of those were "commandeered" from fiield units and do drone intercept duties instead. Note, that unlike HQ-17A (which is effectively a short to meidum range SAM now), both of state of the art Ru- systems remain as SHORAD/CIWS.
In this way, it's still way over that PLAGF fields (HQ-16F as the upper layer) in ABM. And overall, Soviet/Russian army had robust, but numerically limited theater ABM capability since late 1980s (i.e. since S-300V2 was fully fielded).
For air force ADF , "some" ABM was available since 1990s, but this is an afterthought capability for S-300PMU1/2 series.
An important one, though, and one of the reasons China bought them.
"Proper" VKS ABM comes now, with new generation of systems.
Strategic ABM/ASAT: A-235 Nudol. This is more or less HQ-29, but exists in both static (Capital ABM) and mobile variants. Uses two interceptors(close in, mid-course).
Long range AD - S-500: a highly integrated system, presumably* operating as light ASAT(77N6-1), as well as theater ABM/aerodynamic AD(77N6). Closest thing to THAAD equivalent, but it trades pure ABM capacity (number of interceptors per unit is low) for extreme range AD and intercept of low-flying hypersonic threats.
Ironically, S-400's newest top tier interceptor (40N6) is also its "quadpack" missile for bulk. In principle it probably also can use 9m96 family of interceptors(up to 16 per 51P6 launcher), but to my current knowledge, Russia itself never uses it this way, and it's exclusively an export S-400 feature (China, Turkey, India).
S-400s in Russian service effectively do the job HQ-22 does in China, i.e. they're now numbers SAM, relying heavily on cheaper and very numerous(several thousands per year) 48N6 series of interceptors instead of cooler, slowly-produced 40N6. They can do some ABM, but as SARH missile they're predictably overwhelmable.
S-350: mid-close range AD/ABM system, combining something between PAC-3MSE and HQ-9C (9M96D) with something like sky sabre (quad pack - 9M100, allowing for huge number of interceptors...if they can produce it) in one package. Uses one of the weirdest search setups in modern world, which in theory makes it effectively immune to jamming.
To make things a bit more complicated, all S- systems can be integrated through higher level command vehicles - beyond coordination, effectively becoming newer systems with older missiles as well.
SHORAD: Pantsir-S1/2/SM and now SMD(cut down, simplified AD version), as well as wartime MFG anti-air groups (now with Chinese lasers, haha). Note, that before the war, Pantsirs were only really meant to cover S-400 batteries and some of the key installations. Since Syria onwards, it was increasingly understood that SHORADs are damn important, and Since 2023, for obvious reasons, they're all-important. Now with either larger(57E6M) or smaller missile(TKB-1055).
*note, that for all the national interest articles, actual verified public knowledge on them in english internet is now well below that we know about chinese systems. It's only thanks to Ukraine we even know they're active, and we saw some components.
Tor-M2(Tor-M2A), Pantsir-SA and now Pantsir-sm-sv form the modern inner layer (together with whole plethora of other dated, current and future army shorads). Due to extreme value of SHORADS, it appears most of those were "commandeered" from fiield units and do drone intercept duties instead. Note, that unlike HQ-17A (which is effectively a short to meidum range SAM now), both of state of the art Ru- systems remain as SHORAD/CIWS.
In this way, it's still way over that PLAGF fields (HQ-16F as the upper layer) in ABM. And overall, Soviet/Russian army had robust, but numerically limited theater ABM capability since late 1980s (i.e. since S-300V2 was fully fielded).
For air force ADF , "some" ABM was available since 1990s, but this is an afterthought capability for S-300PMU1/2 series.
An important one, though, and one of the reasons China bought them.
"Proper" VKS ABM comes now, with new generation of systems.
Strategic ABM/ASAT: A-235 Nudol. This is more or less HQ-29, but exists in both static (Capital ABM) and mobile variants. Uses two interceptors(close in, mid-course).
Long range AD - S-500: a highly integrated system, presumably* operating as light ASAT(77N6-1), as well as theater ABM/aerodynamic AD(77N6). Closest thing to THAAD equivalent, but it trades pure ABM capacity (number of interceptors per unit is low) for extreme range AD and intercept of low-flying hypersonic threats.
Ironically, S-400's newest top tier interceptor (40N6) is also its "quadpack" missile for bulk. In principle it probably also can use 9m96 family of interceptors(up to 16 per 51P6 launcher), but to my current knowledge, Russia itself never uses it this way, and it's exclusively an export S-400 feature (China, Turkey, India).
S-400s in Russian service effectively do the job HQ-22 does in China, i.e. they're now numbers SAM, relying heavily on cheaper and very numerous(several thousands per year) 48N6 series of interceptors instead of cooler, slowly-produced 40N6. They can do some ABM, but as SARH missile they're predictably overwhelmable.
S-350: mid-close range AD/ABM system, combining something between PAC-3MSE and HQ-9C (9M96D) with something like sky sabre (quad pack - 9M100, allowing for huge number of interceptors...if they can produce it) in one package. Uses one of the weirdest search setups in modern world, which in theory makes it effectively immune to jamming.
To make things a bit more complicated, all S- systems can be integrated through higher level command vehicles - beyond coordination, effectively becoming newer systems with older missiles as well.
SHORAD: Pantsir-S1/2/SM and now SMD(cut down, simplified AD version), as well as wartime MFG anti-air groups (now with Chinese lasers, haha). Note, that before the war, Pantsirs were only really meant to cover S-400 batteries and some of the key installations. Since Syria onwards, it was increasingly understood that SHORADs are damn important, and Since 2023, for obvious reasons, they're all-important. Now with either larger(57E6M) or smaller missile(TKB-1055).
*note, that for all the national interest articles, actual verified public knowledge on them in english internet is now well below that we know about chinese systems. It's only thanks to Ukraine we even know they're active, and we saw some components.