Most likely it is the HQ-64 SAM which is derived from the Italian Aspide. The missile containers and vehicles are dead giveaways.Which is true. The Russian 9M38 and 9M317 ("Buk") are all slant launched and didn't have TVC controls on the back.
It serves to highlight that the HQ-16 system is now an entirely different system from the Buk systems, from the launch systems to the surveillance and fire control radars. The only resemblance between the two are the missile bodies, layouts and dimensions.
On to the next...
I am not sure what missile system this is, but it looks like its based on the SD-10 missile. Could this be the domestic counterpart to the SD-50? Images from LKJ86 at PakDef.
View attachment 47193 View attachment 47192 View attachment 47191
Which is true. The Russian 9M38 and 9M317 ("Buk") are all slant launched and didn't have TVC controls on the back.
It serves to highlight that the HQ-16 system is now an entirely different system from the Buk systems, from the launch systems to the surveillance and fire control radars. The only resemblance between the two are the missile bodies, layouts and dimensions.
On to the next...
I am not sure what missile system this is, but it looks like its based on the SD-10 missile. Could this be the domestic counterpart to the SD-50? Images from LKJ86 at PakDef.
View attachment 47193 View attachment 47192 View attachment 47191
Which is true. The Russian 9M38 and 9M317 ("Buk") are all slant launched and didn't have TVC controls on the back.[...]
However, the naval version, of which the hq-16 is a derivative, is vertically launched and DOES have TVC controls on the rear.