I frankly doubt we know enough for that.
At this point we really know its class - as well that it's somehow justified over KJ-700 to keep funding.
Everything else comes down from that - we know that big jet aircraft have over medium turboprop ones, we know that big radars(esp. in lower bands) have over smaller ones.
This entirely comes down to what is a reasonable null hypothesis between A-100 and KJ-3000. We've had this discussion before so I won't repeat it again, but every time this comparison is made it will be a stickler again and flagged.
Ugh, wide FoW sensors can't match staring narrow fov mirrors.
I am aware, they obviously would fulfill different roles between the respective aircraft.
The reason why I bring it up is to entertain the idea of why it is very much viable for KJ-3000 to still have "high performance EO window" while also not having a nose EO ball visible.