PLA AEW&C, SIGINT, EW and MPA thread

[by78]

I'm preemptively sharing these mundane images to prevent a resident crackpot from posting these with a novel-sized list of utterly boring, useless, and pedantic observations. Seriously, it's not necessary to describe every insignificant little thing in droning detail as if this forum is for the visually impaired. We can all see.

 

[banjex]

@by78 I appreciate when you rag on junior posters posting junior crap. But Tam is one of the more knowledgeable posters on this forum. I don't see why you keep attacking him. If the trivia/wall of text annoys you, ignore it. I must say your constant references to "novel size lists" is becoming much more irritating than the original posts (which I don't find irritating at all).

 

[11226p]

@by78 I appreciate when you rag on junior posters posting junior crap. But Tam is one of the more knowledgeable posters on this forum. I don't see why you keep attacking him. If the trivia/wall of text annoys you, ignore it. I must say your constant references to "novel size lists" is becoming much more irritating than the original posts (which I don't find irritating at all).

I don't think this is about Tam, from what I remember there was a new-ish member here posting these pictures from China Military with commentary that was pointing out some of the more apparent items in the image or focused on weird details

 

[gelgoog]

I don't think this is about Tam, from what I remember there was a new-ish member here posting these pictures from China Military with commentary that was pointing out some of the more apparent items in the image or focused on weird details

Yeah but still he's overdoing it.

 

[by78]

@by78 I appreciate when you rag on junior posters posting junior crap. But Tam is one of the more knowledgeable posters on this forum. I don't see why you keep attacking him. If the trivia/wall of text annoys you, ignore it. I must say your constant references to "novel size lists" is becoming much more irritating than the original posts (which I don't find irritating at all).

FYI, it isn't about Tam, whom I absolutely adore. This is about... Here's a clue.

But yes, you are right, my behavior lately has become overbearing. Thanks for calling that out.

 

[banjex]

FYI, it isn't about Tam, whom I absolutely adore. This is about... Here's a clue.

But yes, you are right, my behavior lately has become overbearing. Thanks for calling that out.

Ah, okay I was mistaken on that point. Cheers!

 

[by78]

Ah, okay I was mistaken on that point. Cheers!

No worries. Cheers to you.

 

[Deleted member 13312]

A KQ-200 MPA with a number started with 8 (@解放军报, PLA Post):

View attachment 70040

Could be no. 85:

View attachment 70045

Or no. 86:

View attachment 70044

All other pictures got the numbers erased:

View attachment 70043

View attachment 70042

View attachment 70041

Great job keep it up.

 

[by78]

A new production KJ-500A with refueling probe.

 

[Deino]

A new production KJ-500A with refueling probe.

Hmm?? Do we really know it is a new one? Based on the number I assume it is more likely a prototype with its CFTE serial?!