Persian Gulf & Middle East Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

delft

Brigadier
Ambassador Bhadrakumar on ISIL, Israel &c.:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Iron enters the Indian soul

That the Bharatiya Janata Party [BJP] is a time-tested friend of Israel is an old story that needs no recap. The Israeli media and the Jewish circles in America even stake claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi promises to shape up as “the most pro-Israel PM in India’s history.” (here). But that still doesn’t explain Parliamentary Minister Venkiah Naidu’s mulish refusal yesterday to voice any criticism of the ongoing Israeli’s attacks on Gaza, which have drawn worldwide condemnation and compared to ‘war crimes’ by the United Nations.

Naidu’s strange plea is that any criticism of Israel might “affect our [India's] foreign policy.” Such sensitivity has never been displayed so openly before in the Indian parliament — notwithstanding the fact that Israel remains a heartache for many stalwarts within BJP and the Congress alike, has many admirers within the foreign and security policy bureaucracy, and India’s close security and military ties with israel are an open secret.
What explains Naidu’s shyness? It might boil down to an obscene 4-letter word — ISIL. The point is, the role that israeli intelligence would have played recently in spiriting out beleagured Indian nurses to safety from the territory of northern Iraq, which is held by the ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant], probably remains the missing link in the Indian narrative.
India has no traditions of genuine investigative journalism on foreign-policy and security issues. What passes as ’scoops’ are mostly handouts by obliging interlocutors within the establishment. The narrative, in this case, handed down in carefully measured ‘leaks’ to journalists has been that the success in rescuing the nurses has been largely due to the ingenuity of two top Indian officials who pulled the strings in Baghdad and Riyadh to get through to the ISIL and thereupon mount an ‘operation’. (here).
But common sense would suggest this can only be the proverbial tip of the iceberg. The heart of the matter is that israeli intelligence is well ensconced in the region of northern Iraq, and has a great presence in Erbil in the autonomous region of Kurdistan — and it has been via Erbil that the nurses from Kerala have been ‘exfiltrated’. (I had pointed this out in the TV discussions in Kerala.)
There is absolutely no doubt that the ISIL and its allies and partners are on the radar of the Israeli intelligence, too. Again, what cannot be overlooked is that the ISIL is more of a metaphor and the forces that are operating in northern Iraq most certainly includes elements that have dealings with the israeli intelligence. The bottom line is that the Iran factor, oil, Turkey, Islamism, terrorism — all these make the happenings in northern Iraq a bread and butter story of the highest grade for the Israeli intelligence.
Now, India and israel work closely in the intelligence field, especially on matters involving extremist Islamist groups. Equally, there are many thousands Indians who are still in Iraq, in whose evacuation, if it becomes necessary, Israeli intelligence help would be extremely valuable.
Clearly, this becomes an issue of national security for the Modi government, which decided, therefore, that political morality and humanitarian considerations simply take the back seat while it crafts the Indian official stance on the beastly Israeli attacks on the hapless people of Gaza, which have already taken a huge toll in human lives. Iron, as Jean-Paul Sartre would have said, has entered the Indian soul.
Posted in Diplomacy, Politics.

Tagged with Gaza, India-Israel, Iraq, ISIL.

By M K Bhadrakumar – July 16, 2014
 

Bernard

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Israel Requests AIM-9X Sidewinder Missiles

The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to Israel for AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $544 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale on July 14, 2014.

The Government of Israel has requested a possible sale of up to 600 AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Block II All-Up-Round Missiles, 50 CATM-9X-2 Captive Air Training Missiles, 4 Dummy Air Training Missiles, containers, missile support and test equipment, provisioning, spare and repair parts, personnel training and training equipment, publications and technical documentation, U.S. Government and contractor technical support services, and other related logistics and program support. The estimated cost is $544 million.

The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to U.S. national interests to assist Israel in developing and maintaining a strong and ready self-defense capability. This proposed sale is consistent with those objectives and will enable the IDF to achieve those goals.

The Israeli Air Force is modernizing its fighter aircraft to better support its own air defense needs. The proposed sale of AIM-9X-2 missiles will improve the capability of the Israeli Air Force, enhance Israeli interoperability with the U.S., and help maintain regional peace and security. Israel will have no difficulty absorbing these missiles into its armed forces.
 

delft

Brigadier
Ambassador Bhadrakumar on Iran, China, Russia and US:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US inching toward Iran deal


The indications from Vienna are that the P5+1 and Iran talks won’t keep the July 20 deadline for reaching a final agreement. But substantial progress would seem to have been achieved and there are proposals on the table for narrowing the differences over the future trajectory of Iran’s enrichment program. That is the overall drift of the latest remarks by Iranian FM Mohammad Javad Zarif who pointed out that without reducing Iran’s centrifuges as such, “there are also some other proven scientific ways to make sure that Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful,” and that it is all a political call now (here).

The striking thing is the absence of rhetoric on both sides — US and Iranian alike. President Barack Obama has strongly hinted that an extension of the July 20 deadline is on the cards. He spoke of “some significant gaps” remaining in the negotiations while underscoring, here, “It’s clear to me that we’ve made real progress in several areas, and that we have a credible way forward.”
Of course, Obama is going to run into some rough weather at the Congress whom the Administration proposes to consult over any extension of the July 20 deadline. There are US lawmakers who want to shift the goal post at this stage by introducing extraneous elements such as Iran’s domestic and regional policies as linked templates in any nuclear deal, but Tehran has consistently rejected any such move and the US’ partners in the P5+1 too will only see it as a deal breaker.
Meanwhile, within the US itself, there is an extraordinary shift in favor of public opinion arguing for the imperatives of US-Iranian normalization. The rejectionist camp has come under pressure and the clout of the Israeli Lobby appears to have been vastly overrated on the Iran question.
A strongly-worded editorial in the New York Times captures the mainstream opinion — “The goal [Iran deal] is within reach, and it would be irresponsible not to make the maximum effort to bridge the final gaps… Such differences are not insurmountable… There are risks in any deal. But there are many more if there is no deal, Iran’s program resumes unchecked and an opportunity to work with Iran on other regional challenges (read Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, et al) slips away.”
In sum, the US’ negotiating hand is weakening — although, Tehran shows no desire to press home the advantage — for various reasons. One, the US cannot afford the talks to end in failure as there is no alternative track of confrontation with Iran conceivable, especially given the acuteness of the regional situation in the Middle East currently. Two, the international climate is becoming complicated.
Russia used to play a supportive role until recently, which helped Washington to pile pressure on Iran, but Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov didn’t show up at Vienna for the latest round. Obama came under compulsion to put a phone call through Chinese President Xi Jinping to possibly try and persuade at least FM Wang Yi to travel to Vienna, but that too failed to work.
Clearly, Russian-Chinese coordination on regional and international issues is expanding and probably includes Iran problem as well. Interestingly, Xi used an unprecedented expression to describe Beijing’s policies toward Russia when he told Russian President Vladimir Putin at their meeting on the sidelines of the BRICS summit that China is “true in word and resolute in deed” as regards Sino-Russian cooperation and that the two powers should implement their consensus “without reservation.” (here).
In real terms, China has put a big hole through the Obama administration’s containment strategy toward Russia. It becomes even less likely that the latest round of US sanctions (announced by Obama on Wednesday) would have any telling effect on Russian policies on Ukraine.
On the other hand, as Putin’s immediate reaction suggests, Moscow is bound to comprehensively reassess the relations with the US. Putin warned in no unmistaken terms that the relationship is nearing a “dead end”. (here).
Arguably, the Obama administration estimates that in a worst case scenario, the US can do without Russia’s cooperation on regional issues. In Syria there is a stalemate that the US seems in no hurry to break and could even be acquiescing with. In Iraq, Russian role is marginal and it is Iran’s cooperation that matters while the US reorients its approach toward the ascendance of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and/or the recasting of a new leadership in Baghdad.
In Afghanistan, already there is evidence that the US is ignoring Russia in working out the post-2014 security scenario. Even the political deadlock following the runoff was handled by Washington directly.
Paradoxically, however, Russia’s ‘non-cooperation’ over any of these regional problems makes things much harder for the US regional policies. But it is when we come to the Iran nuclear issue that the matrix changes completely.
The fact of the matter is that apart from the strategic ties between Russia and Iran (which have overlapping interests as neighboring countries in several regions raging from the Caucasus, the Caspian and Central Asia to the Middle East) and Russia’s nuclear cooperation with Iran (which is poised to expand beyond Bushehr nuclear power plant), simply put, Moscow can help Tehran create a lot of diplomatic space in the negotiations with the US by ploughing an independent furrow. Even in the aftermath of a deal, when it comes to the calibrated removal of the sanctions regime over Iran, Moscow doesn’t have to play footsie with the Obama administration.
To be sure, Iranian diplomacy will explore such new avenues opening up thanks to the shift in the co-relation of forces in world politics, which partly explains President Hassan Rouhani’s participation in the forthcoming summit meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Dushanbe in September. Iran has been seeking full membership in the SCO.
Posted in Diplomacy, Politics.

Tagged with BRICS, Iran nuclear issue, P5+1 and Iran, Russia-China, Ukraine.

By M K Bhadrakumar – July 17, 2014
 

delft

Brigadier
Ambassador Bhadrakumar about Iran but also Ukraine and of course US:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Putin, it’s your payback time

The early bird gets the worm and someone like US president Barack Obama who grew up in the tropics in Hawaii and Indonesia would know it far better than his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin from Leningrad. The alacrity with which Obama scrambled to take early lead in the propaganda war over Moscow on Ukraine almost makes it appear he was expecting such a horrendous tragedy to happen. So far he has had no phone conversation with Putin — not even to ascertain some facts first.

That is, unlike Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel and the two most affected statesmen here in the tragedy of the ill-fated Malaysian plane — Dutch prime minister Mark Rutt and Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak. Rutt, in fact, already twice discussed the tragedy with Putin and they have agreed on the latter’s suggestion for an “independent, open and fair investigation” into the tragic event in Donetsk by the International Civil Aviation Organization with the participation of “all the parties concerned”, and pending that, to demand “an immediate and unconditional ceasefire” in eastern Ukraine.

Will Obama also agree with such an approach? Both Merekl, here, and Razak, here, have promptly agreed with Putin. But then, a ceasefire in Ukraine is the last thing on Obama’s mind, with Vice-President Joe Biden constantly urging President Petro Poroskenko to press ahead with the military crackdown in the restive, disaffected region of Donetsk so that somehow a point of no return could be reached in the relations between Russia and Europe, which are delicately poised.
To be sure, Moscow has lost the propaganda war to Washington. It harks back to the Cold War era. The US was always miles ahead of the former Soviet Union in catching the worm — be it during the Cuban missile crisis, Afghanistan or Boris Pasternak’s Dr. Zhivago.
To my mind, Russia is at fault here. This is what happens to a divided house. It has been quite apparent to any long-time observer that Moscow was being pulled in opposite directions by the so-called ‘westernists’ and ‘orientalists’, the latter on retreat. The Ukraine crisis ought to be a wake-up call. The point is, history has not ended and Russia can never be part of the Western world. It is too big and too different and too powerful and unmanageable. Russia’s presence in the European tent challenges the US’ trans-Atlantic leadership and questions the very raison d’etre of the NATO, and indeed Euro-Atlanticism as the leitmotif of the US global strategies ceases to be.
It is about time the ‘westernists’ among the Moscow elites realize that all they have is a pipe dream. There is no precedent of the US ever having treated another country — including Britain — on an equal footing. Therefore, Russia’s destiny is dictated by the need to consolidate its standing as an independent global player. It has the capacity to do it, but, alas, often enough not the will and interest in discerning who is a potential ally and who is not.
That makes the phone call that Iranian President Hassan Rouhani put through to Putin yesterday a many-splendored thing for a Russia watcher. Of course, Rouhani didn’t broach Ukraine. The surprise would have been if he had.
To be sure, it is a poignant moment in Iran-Russia relations. The Kremlin had cooperated with the Obama administration in the spirit of the (in)famous US-Russia ‘reset’ to put the screws on Iran and isolate that country at a time when Tehran was having its back against the wall. Of course, that was a time when the ‘westernists’ in Moscow were ruling the roost and they were brimming with confidence that they were having a deal with Obama, chewing hotdog and washing ti down with coke. The whole world seemed to them a burger joint, in fact.
The wheel has come full circle now. The reset turned out to be a macabre joke that the Obama administration played on the Kremlin folks. And the mother of all ironies is that Russia today is being threatened with an avalanche of sanctions by the US unless it behaved properly over Ukraine, much the same way Iran used to be threatened until last year.
And, yet, Rouhani didn’t broach Ukraine with Putin. But he’d have left food for thought for Moscow. The point is, simply by being a sincere friend and strategic partner of Iran at this point in time when the US-Iran talks are finely poised, Moscow can turn the tables on Washington and hit back at the cold warriors in Washington where it hurts them most.
Quite obviously, the US’ negotiating hand vis-a-vis Tehran is weakening. A return to ground zero (before the direct talks began) is not possible; a military strike against Iran is not feasible; if talks fail Tehran will resume the nuclear program full-throttle. In sum, Iran has breached the US’ ring of encirclement. That is the meaning of the extension of the July 20 deadline for the nuclear deal. Period.
Now, what Russia can do is tear into tiny pieces the US’ sanctions regime against Iran by simply proceeding to expand the relationship with that country to its full capacity — be it in the field of energy or in defence cooperation. After all, Russia’s plea all along is that it abides by the UN sanctions only. Simply put, put into practice what Moscow preaches. Besides, it will also be the right thing to do from the business angle — to be in Tehran ahead of American companies.
Put differently, make the US negotiate in despair with an Iran, which has Russia’s full support. There is no confrontation on the part of Russia with the US here, either, since Russia will only be deepening and broadening its relations with a friendly country.
The bottom line is that the Iranians will give the Americans a run for their money. There is no way that Tehran is going to give up on its massive assets running into hundreds of billions of dollars, which the US confiscated following the fall of the Shah; it was plain highway robbery. Nor could Iran have forgotten that the Americans deliberately shot down an Iranian civilian aircraft in 1988 – knowing fully well it was a civilian aircraft — killing 300 people on board.
I first began dealing with Iran as a career diplomat in 1989 and I have been to that country so many times that I really lost count. If I know my Iran, I can tell this much: Rouhani reached out to Putin at a defining moment in contemporary world politics.
Posted in Diplomacy, Politics.

By M K Bhadrakumar – July 20, 2014
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Russia Delivering Weapons to Iraq

Deliveries of Mi-35 helicopter gunships and Su-25 fighters that provide close air support for ground troops have begun, added the source.

Iraq also has contracts for Mi-28 attack helicopters and mobile Pantsir-S1 surface-to-air and anti-aircraft artillery systems.

Russia’s ambassador to Baghdad, Ilya Mogunov, had previously said he believed up to 10 Sukhoi fighter jets would be delivered by the end of the summer.

Russia and Iraq in 2012 signed contracts worth $4.2 billion (€3.1 billion) to supply 36 of the Mi-28 attack helicopters and 48 of the Pantsir units, according to Russian Technologies (RosTec) which controls their producers.

Later it signed contracts for six Mi-35 helicopters and Su-25 fighters

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



There are many more Mi-28 and less Mi-35 than announced so far.
 
Top