Pakistan Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

timepass

timepass

Brigadier
[email protected] said:
it Is you who need to hold yourself from posting exaggerated and ill-informed postings every now and then .... just some examples see your own post

from where you have learnt that PA has planned to induct 1,000 AK-II there is no such news or report about AK-II all we know is that it is still in R&D stage (as per official MODP REPORTS)....

Just how you calculate the combine figure of "3,000" tanks that too only by counting "VT4/AKs (all versions)/T80/T85" ... ???

can you give any estimated time period to achieve this magical number of 3,000 tanks ..... ???

I hope you won't termed it as another typo in your post ....

so my dear plz act on your own advice first rather to pass it to others ....


Regards
HRK
Click to expand...

Oh NO..... come on .... not again.....

To suffice you .... kind read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That's around 2200 units without VT4 (300 units) & in pipeline AZs/AK1s and in above post I said around 3k units.....

Now stop further prolonging this with your stupid questions and don't drag the thread ......
 
H

[email protected]

Junior Member
Registered Member
timepass said:
Oh NO..... come on .... not again.....

To suffice you .... kind read
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


That's around 2200 units without VT4 (300 units) & in pipeline AZs/AK1s and in above post I said around 3k units.....

Now stop further prolonging this with your stupid questions and don't drag the thread ......
Click to expand...
Its you who need to stop stating exaggerated figures stupidly .... so stop it .....

timepass said:
n pipeline AZs/AK1s and in above post I said around 3k units.....
Click to expand...
read your own post
timepass said:
South Theater : VT4/AKs (all versions)/T80/T85 (around 3000 MBTs in total)
Click to expand...

now tell me where is AZ tank is written in your above quoted post ..... ???? even if we include AZ this will not give you the figure 3000 tanks .... So again stop posting exaggerated and stupid posting from your end .... you are embarrassing whole community here from a long period ....

Consider this as my last post with you .....

@Deino .... You know about it from some time plz note it one more time .....
 
timepass

timepass

Brigadier
Update on Pakistan-Russia .....

Since Pakistan's Defense Minister is in Russia & there have been reports that Pakistan has ordered more Mi-35 Attack Helicopters (Approximately 20 pieces "Number not confirm"). Pakistan currently operates 4x Mi-35 Attack Helicopters.

As per sources delivery of Pantsir-S 1 Air Defense System to Pakistan is in final stages.

Pakistan & Russia can reach the agreement for the license production of AK-103 Assault Rifle for Pakistan Army.

1601120290843.png

1601120110222.png

1601120123899.png

1601120137500.png



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
timepass said:
@[email protected] - Due to the same attitude you got blocked on PDF..... hence don't try to be another pseudointellectual ....
Click to expand...


No he was neither blocked nor banned at the PDF - at least not by me - "due to the same attitude", but it was you, who was warned not to post any stupid claim you find on any random forum or internet site and honestly, to quote Wiki is truly not the best way to persuade!

As such again: Stop posting any exaggerated claim based on unreliable sources! Discuss but do this in a civilised manner.
 
timepass

timepass

Brigadier
Deino said:
No he was neither blocked nor banned at the PDF - at least not by me - "due to the same attitude", but it was you, who was warned not to post any stupid claim you find on any random forum or internet site and honestly, to quote Wiki is truly not the best way to persuade!

As such again: Stop posting any exaggerated claim based on unreliable sources! Discuss but do this in a civilised manner.
Click to expand...

As expected.....

Anyhow, would you care to elaborate the meaning of reliable source.... and who will decide that (so called stupid claims) ....
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
timepass said:
As expected.....

Anyhow, would you care to elaborate the meaning of reliable source.... and who will decide that (so called stupid claims) ....
Click to expand...


Since when is that site
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
a reliable source!??

We already had this discussion more than once and only since you were correct once does not mean you shall post any BS here too.
Also, why posting the same of anything from Russia in the Russian news section again? Seems as if your aim is mods of all to get a lot of posts regardless how reliable or true they are.

End of that off topic debate.
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
timepass said:
I just ask a simple question ..... who will decide whatever news link (XYZ) is reliable source or not .... would you care to answer....
Click to expand...


At least not a FB site which has claimed often enough false issues like "the PAF will soon get XYZ" or Wiki, which can be edited by nearly everyone. As such in thsi case go out and search for original sources, quote them and argue, why by your opinion the Pakistan Army has a much higher number of tanks than others claim based on their sources. Only to post a Wiki-link and telling that's a fact of posting this FB site is as reliable as posting SCMP and Minnie Chan reports.

As such you can surely continue post such things from this site but please don't be annoyed if no-one takes them or you seriously and challenges your claims.
 
timepass

timepass

Brigadier
Deino said:
At least not a FB site which has claimed often enough false issues like "the PAF will soon get XYZ" or Wiki, which can be edited by nearly everyone. As such in thsi case go out and search for original sources, quote them and argue, why by your opinion the Pakistan Army has a much higher number of tanks than others claim based on their sources. Only to post a Wiki-link and telling that's a fact of posting this FB site is as reliable as posting SCMP and Minnie Chan reports.
Click to expand...

Don't link my question with PAF or Pak army......


Deino said:
As such you can surely continue post such things from this site but please don't be annoyed if no-one takes them or you seriously and challenges your claims.
Click to expand...

as my question still stands valid who decide whatever source (from anywhere around the globe) is reliable or not.... kindly answer specially (decision on source reliability) .... or on what basis will be challenge....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top