I am not sure letting Xi staying in power for another 20 years is a good idea lol. if he works lets say four terms, 20 years, okay I think it makes sense. another 20? it hasn't worked out well in the past, i dont see him being better than all those past emperors. he reminds me of Han Wu emperor, in terms of his place in the Communist Party as well as China's external environment. Wu Emperor did not handle his succession well at all, neither has any other of the best emperors in China, and Mao.
Official Xi Jinping Thought discussion thread
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
solarz
Brigadier
That video just reminded me, once again, of just how DRAB Western aesthetics are.
The end goal of the great firewall is to bring in everyone else, not remove it.
I do think as China's AI/algorithms gets even better and/or human bots from US start thinning out from getting less paid, restrictions will be applied much smoother.
In the "release version" of the global secure Internet, there will likely be no obvious visible restrictions. Algorithms would find hostile state actors, criminals and other unsavoury groups, maybe overload them with captchas, security verifications etc, leading to a soft ban that would escalate to a hard ban if unnatural activity continues. Normal users would not really see the process.
Xi should create a coherent story about how, what, why of Tiananmen square story from their perspective. You can take references to fall of the soviet union, Maidan movement, hong kong, USAID NGO in eastern Europe. How Deng's action prevented the illegal take over of China. Either make an official documentary/docu serie or hire some "independent" docu maker to do, something like Netflix Chernobyl.
Putting the emphasis on the traitorous parts of it, especially given with all the stuff coming out during this USAID and DOGE battle.
Then make it mandatory to embed that story in every AI model made in China. See if they still like Xi's version of the Tiananmen story and if they are still hungry to prompt about it.
Putting the emphasis on the traitorous parts of it, especially given with all the stuff coming out during this USAID and DOGE battle.
Then make it mandatory to embed that story in every AI model made in China. See if they still like Xi's version of the Tiananmen story and if they are still hungry to prompt about it.
This! The way they currently dodge the issue at home pretending it did not exist in history is really baffling. It is not like that there were still a whole lot of libtards within the system.
I think the government just doesn't find it very interesting. It's like US doesn't really talk super much about MOVE bombings or Kent state massacre. Old history and the current leading guys are so far removed from the leading guys then.
They still ban "people" (I.e. US bots) today if they constantly talk about it, not because it's relevant or sensitive, but because if you saw a lot of foreign adversaries spam the same lines over and over again like a broken record, you'd also just ban them so they're not manipulating the algorithm.
As the algorithims get way more sophisticated with every generation, "censorship" will become less and less noticable, less false alarms, less wrongful bans etc.
It's defintely not anywhere near a top official's pay grade to speak about 1989 June 4. But maybe it's possible for a lower instance, some department with people studying history/political history, with connections to some filmmakers/journalists etc to make a documentry.
Last edited:
CPC not clearly reaffirming its position on the issue leaves the social media platforms unsure of where the red lines are in censorship. Often the platforms just overreact to be on the safe side and kill all posts that contain 1989-6-4 the date, Tiananmen Square the name, etc. regardless of the real intentions of the authors. That has created a lot frustrations among the wumaos.
On the other hand, some platforms that have libtards in control have also been taking advantage of this lack of clarity when they need to suppress their own dissents.
Last edited:
Of late I’ve been contemplating the true meaning behind national confidence and, by extension, self-confidence. Obviously self confidence is not the same as self aggrandizement prevalent in a certain culture. If you are over weight or malnourished, you are not physically fit no matter what the body positivity lies tell you. This does raise the question — how do you self improve without falling into the trap of self hate?
The answer is actually pretty obvious if you tackle the problem from the Sigma Male approach taken by Chinese leadership. Instead of blindly simping for successful nations, analyze the underlying reasons for their success and apply them in a way best compatible to you.
For example, imagine you are a student in a high school where the lead jock wears baggy pants and everyone tries to emulate his fashion style. Can you become popular just by wearing baggy pants if you are unfit and unhygienic? The answer is clearly no! You’ll just be a stinky loser in baggy clothing! The real reason why the jock is popular is because he smells good and is swole as fuck. Therefore the correct way to go about this is to create self improvement plans. Take frequent showers, use good deodorants, and work out so that you are even more muscular than the lead jock. Once you have the physical hardware, you’ll be able to dictate the fashion choice.
Last edited:
I think it is just not worth the risk right now. Why even bring this topic up right now and risk turning some against you, rather than just letting time be the medicine? it really achieves nothing to be honest.