AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
The context to me is simply basic reading of AssassinsMace's statement and that is common denial of universal suffrage as the British did. That in my view is simply not factually comparable because universal suffrage is contained in the Basic Law. There is simply no such binding legal obligation on the British. Any attempt to link it to some other context or discussion is just your view - not mine.
.
Just like you don't have any understanding of democracy you have no understanding of human rights. So it's okay for the British to to deny democracy because it wasn't mentioned in the treaty? So slavery was okay because there was no treaty that said it wasn't? That means anyone today can kidnap people and enslave them because there was no agreement signed between the enslaver and slave saying it was or was not allowed. Rape must be okay unless the victim gets a sign contract with the rapist that it's not allowed.