D
Deleted member 675
Guest
SampanViking said:Heading in a dangerously forbidden and off topic direction again Mr Fu.
The point raised in the article was relevant to the topic in hand, as it is a point to why China might want to reconsider its somewhat tame attitude in dealing with North Korean beligerence. NK's actions have repercussions across the entire region after all. You yourself recently gave latitude to others in a certain thread without any warnings, so I hope you can see the relevance yourself in the point I emphasised.
Also, discussions of the Japanese armed forces or any related topics (bar the historical aspect) are not forbidden, so I don't know why you made that other comment.
However it was merely an illustrative point. I don't intend to discuss it in any further detail, so there's no problem there. The whole article is still very interesting and a good indication of why China should put real pressure on NK.
By the way, I wouldn't call China a "dog", and I am quite sure I would be flamed if I did - so I think you should consider your language more carefully next time.
----------
Now North Korea is talking about taking tougher action if it is pressured to stop. Talk about pathetic!
(Thanks for tidying this up, popeye.)
Last edited by a moderator: