Agreed. To come up with revolutionary ideas, you need to be able to challenge conventional norms and beliefs. However, in order to be able for that to occur, that person must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to be in a position to make changes. The West is too fixated on the former and forgetting the latter.
China is better suited for orienting itself to capitalize on the 2nd mover advantage. It might not be able to nurture the 'free-thinking' creative minds that make revolutionary ideas or technologies like in the West but it makes up for it by being more practical and focused. The Chinese model take a more evolutionary approach to things by building upon established ideas and technologies that work. It's not better or worse, it’s just different. Many of today's biggest brands were not pioneers who created the first of its kind product or service but someone who did it better than their competition by learning from their competitor’s successes and failures. If the West is the so-called 'leader' that inspires the world with dreams and ideas, then China is the 'manager' that gets things done.
For all intents and purposes, China doesn’t need reinvent the geopolitical game; it just needs to continue to play the game better.