maybe, but right we know samsung hasn't help huawei yet.
News on China's scientific and technological development.
- Thread starter Quickie
- Start date
We published our poll on September 10, with 3,564 of you chiming in. And the results are clear: most of you believe the US went too far against Huawei, with 67.6% of readers contending that the ban was either too strict or shouldn’t have been in place at all. That left just 32.4% of you agreeing with the restrictions.
This doesn’t come as a complete shock. While the US government has been adamant that Huawei poses a security risk due to the possibility of receiving surveillance requests from the Chinese Communist Party, there’s been a distinct lack of public evidence to show this has happened. It wouldn’t be surprising if you remain unconvinced that Huawei is a threat.
This doesn’t come as a complete shock. While the US government has been adamant that Huawei poses a security risk due to the possibility of receiving surveillance requests from the Chinese Communist Party, there’s been a distinct lack of public evidence to show this has happened. It wouldn’t be surprising if you remain unconvinced that Huawei is a threat.
Repost.
As I said before, China should and would retaliate. No need to be afraid of Trump and his threats. Many people feel that China should wait til after the election. I would argue that a strong response is necessary. Not saying China needs tit for tat but China needs to make a stand.
China issues rules on Unreliable Entities List
China's Commerce Ministry on Saturday issued rules on its Unreliable Entities List (UEL).
The list said it will target foreign entities, including foreign firms, other organizations and individuals, endangering China's national sovereignty, security and development interest, as well as those in violation of normal market trading principles.
Entities on the UEL will be restricted or prohibited from doing import and export activities related to China and investing in the country. They will also be restricted or barred from entering and staying in the country.
China issues rules on Unreliable Entities List
China's Commerce Ministry on Saturday issued rules on its Unreliable Entities List (UEL).
The list said it will target foreign entities, including foreign firms, other organizations and individuals, endangering China's national sovereignty, security and development interest, as well as those in violation of normal market trading principles.
Entities on the UEL will be restricted or prohibited from doing import and export activities related to China and investing in the country. They will also be restricted or barred from entering and staying in the country.
Oh man, coming from a market that is on verge of becoming the single largest and still outgrowing the entire western hemisphere.
America is too used to scare others into submission, this time China is calling her bluff.
5 years later: China refuses to open her market up for competition, this is against free market principle !!!!!!! Please ignore what the previous admin did, it was a huge mistake. The new admin will allow tech sales to you now PLEASE !!
Hmmm ...
Kind of thinking of something else ...
According to the rules of the "Unreliable Entity List" ...
There is a provision in there that entitles the subject entity for banishment to defend themselves ...
Sounds to me they going to put the three amigos onto that list, such as:-
---US Military Industrial complex company, ban of rare earths
---Japanese telecom company since they discriminate on Huawei
---TSMC because they did not sell to Huawei
Imagine the reaction inside China to that!
Put the foreign company on notice, demand an explanation, then make a judgement ... a mainland legal investigation and process that will last a minimum half a year to a year!
That should be fun for the bureaucrat in charge. He/she would think they are corporate emperor!
Are we in a Bizarro world or has trump come to some senses (oh no!) ?
Huawei may have some hope as AMD gets license to sell products to companies in the Entity List
By
-
Sep 18, 2020
Huawei is currently struggling to keep its business afloat as the Chinese giant has been heavily restricted by the sanctions from the United States from procuring or manufacturing necessary components.
But it seems that there is some hope for the company. Forrest Norrod, Senior Vice President at AMD that the company has been granted a license to sell its products to some of the companies in the US Entity List.
The licenses secured by the company ensures that there won’t be a significant impact on the business at this time because of the China-focused . He also added that the company is complying with all the rules and regulations.
However, it’s noteworthy that Forrest Norrod hasn’t revealed the names of the companies for which has been granted licenses to carry on doing business. So, we are not sure if the Chinese giant Huawei is in it
Even if there’s no license for Huawei right now, his statement shed light on the fact that the United States is giving out licenses to companies for doing business with those firms that are in the Entity List. So, sooner or later, licenses can be granted to companies for doing business with Huawei.
Many companies have started lobbying with the United States government to reconsider some of the restrictions placed on Huawei, arguing that it impacts American businesses, both in terms of innovation and finance.
Huawei may have some hope as AMD gets license to sell products to companies in the Entity List
By
-
Sep 18, 2020
Huawei is currently struggling to keep its business afloat as the Chinese giant has been heavily restricted by the sanctions from the United States from procuring or manufacturing necessary components.
But it seems that there is some hope for the company. Forrest Norrod, Senior Vice President at AMD that the company has been granted a license to sell its products to some of the companies in the US Entity List.
The licenses secured by the company ensures that there won’t be a significant impact on the business at this time because of the China-focused . He also added that the company is complying with all the rules and regulations.
However, it’s noteworthy that Forrest Norrod hasn’t revealed the names of the companies for which has been granted licenses to carry on doing business. So, we are not sure if the Chinese giant Huawei is in it
Even if there’s no license for Huawei right now, his statement shed light on the fact that the United States is giving out licenses to companies for doing business with those firms that are in the Entity List. So, sooner or later, licenses can be granted to companies for doing business with Huawei.
Many companies have started lobbying with the United States government to reconsider some of the restrictions placed on Huawei, arguing that it impacts American businesses, both in terms of innovation and finance.
The Huawei Ban Could Crush U.S. Overseas Aid Efforts
A new law meant to keep Chinese telecoms out of American networks threatens to make life impossible for diplomats, aid workers, and the military across much of Africa and Asia.
BY | SEPTEMBER 18, 2020, 12:59 PM
A new U.S. law designed to keep Chinese telecommunications companies out of American networks is threatening to delay, disrupt, or kill vital U.S. military, diplomatic, and aid programs, particularly in Africa and Asia, where Chinese telecoms are the only game in town.
The law, which went into effect in August, is intended to purge Chinese telecommunications technology from the communications systems of U.S. agencies and contractors, a task that is particularly challenging in countries that rely almost entirely on Chinese tech. Supporters hope the legislation will gradually wean American agencies and businesses off of Chinese technology and open the market for U.S. and allied countries to compete with China.
But critics say it may have the opposite effect, undermining foreign assistance programs and hamstringing U.S. agencies and companies vying with China and other rivals for influence—providing a boost for China as it seeks to promote its major infrastructure and trade mission, known as the Belt and Road Initiative.
A new law meant to keep Chinese telecoms out of American networks threatens to make life impossible for diplomats, aid workers, and the military across much of Africa and Asia.
BY | SEPTEMBER 18, 2020, 12:59 PM
A new U.S. law designed to keep Chinese telecommunications companies out of American networks is threatening to delay, disrupt, or kill vital U.S. military, diplomatic, and aid programs, particularly in Africa and Asia, where Chinese telecoms are the only game in town.
The law, which went into effect in August, is intended to purge Chinese telecommunications technology from the communications systems of U.S. agencies and contractors, a task that is particularly challenging in countries that rely almost entirely on Chinese tech. Supporters hope the legislation will gradually wean American agencies and businesses off of Chinese technology and open the market for U.S. and allied countries to compete with China.
But critics say it may have the opposite effect, undermining foreign assistance programs and hamstringing U.S. agencies and companies vying with China and other rivals for influence—providing a boost for China as it seeks to promote its major infrastructure and trade mission, known as the Belt and Road Initiative.
Behind these headline numbers also are deeper industrial trends, which again work in China’s favor, helping it pick up global market share in the aftermath of Covid-19 lockdowns. Increasingly, China is supplying the kind of sophisticated machinery that German manufacturers once dominated, like high-end tunnel borers and hydraulic valves and pumps used in wind turbines.
“It’s only a matter of time ,” says Ulrich Ackermann, managing director for foreign trade at Germany’s VDMA Mechanical Engineering Industry Association.
“It’s only a matter of time ,” says Ulrich Ackermann, managing director for foreign trade at Germany’s VDMA Mechanical Engineering Industry Association.
From foreigners' biased viewpoints
China's Quest for Foreign Technology
Beyond Espionage
By
,
Copyright Year 2021
This book analyzes China’s foreign technology acquisition activity and how this has helped its rapid rise to superpower status.
Since 1949, China has operated a vast and unique system of foreign technology spotting and transfer aimed at accelerating civilian and military development, reducing the cost of basic research, and shoring up its power domestically and abroad—without running the political risks borne by liberal societies as a basis for their creative developments. While discounted in some circles as derivative and consigned to perpetual catch-up mode, China’s "hybrid" system of legal, illegal, and extralegal import of foreign technology, combined with its indigenous efforts, is, the authors believe, enormously effective and must be taken seriously. Accordingly, in this volume, 17 international specialists combine their scholarship to portray the system’s structure and functioning in heretofore unseen detail, using primary Chinese sources to demonstrate the perniciousness of the problem in a manner not likely to be controverted. The book concludes with a series of recommendations culled from the authors’ interactions with experts worldwide.
China's Quest for Foreign Technology
Beyond Espionage
By
,
Copyright Year 2021
This book analyzes China’s foreign technology acquisition activity and how this has helped its rapid rise to superpower status.
Since 1949, China has operated a vast and unique system of foreign technology spotting and transfer aimed at accelerating civilian and military development, reducing the cost of basic research, and shoring up its power domestically and abroad—without running the political risks borne by liberal societies as a basis for their creative developments. While discounted in some circles as derivative and consigned to perpetual catch-up mode, China’s "hybrid" system of legal, illegal, and extralegal import of foreign technology, combined with its indigenous efforts, is, the authors believe, enormously effective and must be taken seriously. Accordingly, in this volume, 17 international specialists combine their scholarship to portray the system’s structure and functioning in heretofore unseen detail, using primary Chinese sources to demonstrate the perniciousness of the problem in a manner not likely to be controverted. The book concludes with a series of recommendations culled from the authors’ interactions with experts worldwide.