News on China's scientific and technological development.

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Well put! Everytime Taiwan Independence is brought up, I am reminded of the words of Li Ao: Taiwan will never become independent because the pro-independence group is just spoiled kids. If you really wanted to fight for independence, you need to be ready to die for your cause. There's not one person in the TI group that's willing to do that.

Li Ao lived through the White Terror period under the KMT (he still hates their guts to this day), he was thrown in jail for his activism, so he knows what he's talking about.
It is actually far not enough to want to die for your cause. I believe many North Koreans are willing to die to neutralize the US, but it's not even close to being enough; they can expend an American bullet at most. The Taliban and ISIS are filled with fighter who are willing to die for their cause but they cannot win... against any professional military. The reason that China is so successful is not because it is a country of 1.4 billion crazies who would all die to see China number 1; it is that China was able to overcome the hurdle of hatred and pride to humbly learn, develop, and grow. For a cause to become powerful, it must be supported not by radical sacrificial violence, but by educated leaders with long term plans/visions who develop technology, accumulate/wield resources, and treat the cause like a 100-year chess match rather than a challenge for immediate heroism. To die in a blaze of glory in mortal combat with your foe is easy... compared to living a long, humble life, through insult and injustice, all for the purpose of slowly forging yourself into someone who possesses the knowledge to develop technologies that exalt your nation and depress your rivals. That is how nations are built and causes won, not by the desire to die gloriously, and most certainly not by spoiled brats who contribute nothing except screaming hatred at something they don't understand, as we see in Taiwan. My favorite quote:

"The highest he could raise himself to was to die gloriously for something; now he rises to something greater: to live humbly for something." - Otto Ludwig
 
Last edited:
I think it's actually 2 different groups of people:

We have group one, which has money, runs businesses, expands them into the mainland and realizes what a pleasure it is to work with their mainland brothers and what a pride-bearing asset it is to be Chinese.

Then, we have group two, made of people with no money to invest, no businesses to run, nothing to live or die for, and only want something to scream about so they don't get bored to death living their meaningless lives of mediocrity; they support independence like people support their local sports teams for no reason that they understand.

Unfortunately, populations are usually comprised of a small group of smart, well-to-do people and a ton of sheep morons.

Not to single out this post but it is one example of a disturbing pattern of severe egoism, with wealth or some sort of success being the supposed justification, often applied in conjunction with other prejudices. No one truly succeeds due to nothing but their own efforts, similarly nor do people fail due to nothing but their own efforts, pure meritocracy doesn't exist in the real world.

Well, I have a different opinion on that.

Not sure if you have been in the following situation:

You and your co-worker have been best buddies. One day, your co-worker is promoted to manager. You suddenly look at him as if he becomes this nasty, ugly SOB who must have done some naughty stuff to get that promotion. You don't want to talk to him anymore.

Then a few years later, when you get used to the idea that this guy is here to stay and he IS your boss, you accept that fact and move on. You are still not happy that you are not the one getting the promotion, but you understand that your buddy is a capable one who deserves the promotion albeit the fact that you prefer to be the manager.

A few more years passed, you become comfortable with the fact that your buddy is the manager and you folllow his orders.

This is where India is now. India and China used to be at similar levels. Of course, India has the ambition to be a superpower. China has moved up the ladder. That makes India mad. That's normal. It may take some time but eventually, India will accept the fact that China is more powerful. You just need to give them time.

In fact, the whole world needs time to get used to the idea that China is more powerful.

Just imagine what you would THINK about a buddy who suddenly becomes a billionaire. You may say "congratulations" but deep down in your heart, you wish it could be you and you curse the guy. That's what everyone in the world is doing to China. Perfectly normal. It just takes time.

IF the person ever gets over it, many in that position can probably use a hand from the other person with that. Besides from envy, pride and greed are also emotions major value systems the world over try to rein in as they are pretty powerful and persistent in causing conflict and destruction.
 
...
I am also with Sanblvd It doesn't matter what China did or did not the western world still hostile to her not because of specific action that China did but because of strategic competition They know sooner or latter China will eat the west lunch and created unemployment and loss of market
Vietnam and China is not friendly because China refrain from action in SCS China didn't The building of island continue

But those countries realized that in the long run their interest better serve by having better relation with China
India will always hostile and suspicious no matter what because she feel like she is the anointed super power but fail to realized it while at the same time looking at booming Chinese economy
...

While strategic competition is a factor I wouldn't give it too much credit/blame, tribal emotions and fear/hatred of the different or unfamiliar is also a factor no matter how "civilized" any country is. The systemic causes, whether recognized or not, of economic problems are also factors in their own right.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Back to technical innovation and development. Here is an interesting article via Emperor from CDF
I also can add Chinese think in long term commitment instead of start and fit like in the western world
A willingness to take risk since most of the management still in the hand of the founder instead of professional manager
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China has a real tech edge over the US, and it's cultural
Lauren deLisa Coleman, digi-cultural trend analyst, author, speaker, and consultant
Published 23 Hours Ago
CNBC.com

Once known primarily for cheap manufacturing, China is fast becoming a major tech innovator. It is now not only a major magnet for U.S. venture capital investment, but also a dominant force in innovation — as demonstrated by the fact that the country just set a new record for filing the most patents, ever.

The Boston Consulting Group just released a massive report showing that Chinese unicorns are now reaching the $1 billion valuation mark faster than their American counterparts, and will soon overtake those in the U.S.

There is such a hotbed of tech activity in the region that China could soon rival — and even potentially overtake — Silicon Valley as the world's tech powerhouse. While many credit such a surge to the country's market size or government support, the true secret weapon seems to be the strategic and innovative mindset with which the Chinese actually approach the business of technology.

What's that mindset? It comes down, broadly, to three factors:

1. A tendency to collaborate with other firms rather than compete with them.

2. An approach to hiring that avoids some of the legacy baggage that U.S. firms are only now dealing with, like gender discrimination.

3. An attitude toward product cycles that emphasizes the next iteration of a product, rather than staying attached to a currently successful one.

"China missed the Industrial Revolution but it is definitely a co-architect of the Information Age, said Arvind Sethumadhavan, CIO at Dentsu Aegis Network Asia Pacific.

The collaboration is evident among juggernauts like Alibaba, Tencent and Dji, which by now are all well-known success stories.

But now they are not only expanding into new arenas, but also combining forces — unlike their U.S. counterparts — giving themselves staggering investment power and reach. That collaborative spirit in this case means there's a huge capital base that can be used to power new innovations at rapid pace.


Beyond just having a lot of money to invest, Chinese tech has managed to avoid some hiring issues currently plaguing Silicon Valley.

For example, while controversy over diversity has plagued companies like Google and Uber, ride-share mammoth DiDi Chuxing — which beat Uber in China via such new moves as mobile pay discount partnerships with Tencent for ride-share business — is leading with the introduction of its Women's Network program earlier this year. The program has not only yielded significant numbers of women in many of the company's senior management positions, but the company also boasts women in over 37 percent of the company's tech positions, including product managers, engineers and data scientists — numbers much higher than Silicon Valley tech firms.

But the real growing strength comes from companies that are quietly building businesses focused on having an ongoing global impact, rather than thinking beyond current product iteration.

One example: Shenzhen Onething Technologies — a shared economic cloud computing company — is generating millions of dollars after just a couple of years, thanks to such customers like video behemoth Panda.TV. The company recently held court at the SXSW conference, and its new perspective toward video will enable it to compete globally in just a few months.

Given the massive storage that will be needed for all the AI-based computing and VR offerings, there will soon be ceiling issues. In an interesting move to anticipate and beat this problem, Onething is the first company in its category to offer content delivery networks (CDNs) of "infinite node," meaning it collects idle home bandwidth to overcome that problem.

Another company, OxyLED, is becoming a leader in smart home design and lighting. "We simply thought about how to create new lighting solutions leveraging technology that were easy to install and looked different," said Nick Niu, OxyLED GM.

People walk through Alibaba.com Ltd.'s headquarters in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
OxyLED, which is owned by Eric He, is focused on the smart home, and develops voice-controlled, Wi-Fi-supported LED products, and aims to capture as much of the $26.9 billion LED market as it can. The company was focused on LED long before the U.S. market seemed to even be familiar with the concept.

Its growth is a contrast to once-hailed Switch Lighting, from New Zealand, which experienced major leaks and other tech issues that led to its demise. While others have tried to take Switch's place, OxyLED's size, price and approach creates a product that is hard to compete with.

Still, even with these advantages, China has its share of potential pitfalls. The biggest is probably its centrally controlled marketplace.

"The Chinese central government picks winner and losers. Once this is happening, the government will do whatever it takes to build and scale tech companies that can compete with the best American tech companies," said Marc A. Ross, former communications director of the US-China Business Council and founder of Caracal Global.

That's the opposite of the American free market ethos, and there's no guarantee China's centrally directed method will work long term.

"China's central government limits or forbids foreign investment or foreign access to over 100 sectors of the Chinese economy," said Ross. "Much of this protectionism is to ensure Chinese companies do not have any real competition with the belief this will allow them to build the necessary skills and resources to be competitive on a global stage."

That creates the appearance that Chinese companies are big and successful, but appearances may be deceiving. Government support prevents the market from truly knowing how strong and resilient Jack Ma and Alibaba are for example, since the company is selected as the Chinese e-commerce "winner," said Ross.

"[Alibaba] is protected from a real marketplace challenge and hasn't had to compete against Jeff Bezos and Amazon in China," said Ross.

The different business landscape in China makes for a potentially formidable situation for U.S. tech stakeholders, and many in U.S. tech are worried. But Ross believes that China will hit many setbacks over a long, upward road before any real scales are tipped. The country could face geopolitical unrest, trade friction with the United States, or even global product shortages that could interfere with vital supply chains.

Others think that's little to stop China.

"China has spent heavily during the last few years developing its technology, especially on manufacturing. There are several other factors, like manufacturing ecosystems, evolved supply chain management, and low costs that will continue to make China a powerful force when it comes to tech," said Niu.

"And when it comes to new approaches using such ecosystems, we just think differently from the U.S. We have to, if we want to compete."

Lauren DeLisa Coleman is a digital business strategy and communications consultant, analyst, journalist and speaker. Follow her on Twitter @ultra_Lauren
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
China should not listen to the noise coming from the West about how China's doing things. China has already defied most of what they believed. And if you notice their criticisms all have all to do with trying to get the US in for their own interests and not what's best for China.

Obama repeated like a broken record that political freedom and innovation were connected. Now they talk about how China is challenging the US in innovation and technology while charging freedom in China has only gotten worse.

Some of the pitfalls mentioned in the article happen in the US also. And one unique to the US that results in the rest is believing the-US-is-superior-and-you're-not attitude. The US prevents Chinese investment for national security reasons but criticizes China for not allowing it in theirs. They believe Chinese will contribute nothing while American will contribute everything. Somehow they think Amazon would beat Alibaba if it were given fair treatment in China. Who shops on Alibaba in the US? Very few. All the knocks against China and Chinese products in general by the West and spreading it around the world isn't rigging it in their favor? That's how the US tries to turn customers away from buying from China. So what they say is bad policy for China is apparently good for the US when they do it.

Every criticism is about letting them in to influence and control not what's best for China. They isolated China believing no one can do anything without them thus hoping to impede China's progress forward. Now there are Chinese giants equivalent to the giants of West built on domestic demand and China didn't need their acceptance to be successful. Something the world hasn't seen in hundreds of years. The US can go it alone but apparently China can't?
 
Last edited:
now I read
Better rubidium clocks increase BeiDou satnav accuracy
Xinhua| 2017-11-06 15:32:55
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

New, ultra-accurate rubidium atomic clocks on board two BeiDou-3 satellites launched into space Sunday have greatly improved the accuracy of the system.

The two satellites are equipped with more reliable rubidium atomic timekeepers than those in previous BeiDou satellites. According to Yang Changfeng, chief designer of the satellite system, their stability was as high as E-14. "It means only one second of deviation in 3 million years," he said.

Important payloads of the navigation satellites, atomic clocks are the workhorses which synchronize the signals that allow satnav receivers to triangulate their position on Earth.

"The stability of the new-generation clocks has been improved by 10 times, compared with those carried by BeiDou-2 satellites," said Qu Yongsheng from the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation fifth research institute, Xi'an branch, developer of the clocks.

Qu said this new technology has raised the positioning accuracy of the BeiDou-3 to 2.5 - 5 meters from 10 meters in the past.

Named after the Chinese term the Big Dipper constellation, the BeiDou project was formally initiated in 1994, began to serve China in 2000 and was expanded across the Asia-Pacific region at the end of 2012.

BeiDou is intended to become a global positioning and navigation system by around 2020.
 

Figaro

Senior Member
Registered Member
China's climatic lab ...
China's first comprehensive climatic lab expected to be put into use in 2018

2017-11-06 16:21

People's Daily Online Editor: Li Yan

China's first comprehensive climatic laboratory is expected to be put into use in 2018, according to a forum on aircraft-technology development held in Shanghai on Nov. 4

By then, aircraft climatic testing will no longer be limited to airports with particular environments, and most of the tests can be performed at the lab.

The C919, China's first domestically developed large passenger jet, will be tested in the climatic laboratory.

China's Aviation Industry Aircraft Strength Research Institute (AIASRI) prepared for the lab three years ago. Located in Xi'an, northwestern China's Shaanxi province, it has a gross area of 13,000 square meters.

The lab is able to simulate various extreme weather conditions through refrigeration, heating, air conditioning, and controlling technologies, offering testing environments for any season, location, or time.

"The aircraft will be tested in a number of weather conditions," said Yang Hai, a senior research fellow with AIASRI. For instance, the aircraft will be placed in the lab for 48 hours where the temperature will be lowered to minus 50 degrees Celsius to see whether it can still function, he added.

Many aircraft are currently waiting to undergo testing in the lab, including the C919, he said. In addition, fatigue testing of the C919 will be finished two years after its maiden flight.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Xinjiang is mostly dessert if some one can find a magic potion that turn sand into productive soil that would be the ultimate wishful thinking . But a professor at Chongqing is doing exactly that Click this url does not work here is substitue
Plant fiber turning desert to oasis
By Tan Yingzi | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2017-11-06 14:54
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Turning a desert into an oasis is not a dream anymore. Yi Zhijian, a professor at Chongqing Jiaotong University, and his team have invented a plant fiber binder to transform sand into soil for farming, and the experiment is going smoothly in Inner Mongolia, Chongqing Daily reported.

The Ulanbuh Desert, about 14,000 square kilometers in area, lies on the west bank of the Yellow River in Alshaa League, Inner Mongolia autonomous region. Every spring, Beijing's sandstorms originate here.

In May 2016, the team successfully made about 16,667 square meters survive in the edge of the Ulanbuh Desert, two kilometers from the west bank of the Yellow River. In 2017, another experimental area of 2 square kilometers is now covered with hundreds of plants planted in February, such as trees, grass and crops.
 
Top