News on China's scientific and technological development.

I don't exactly understand what you mean by "Nuclear Power Treasure" BUT if you are talking about a nuclear reactor instead of a nuclear battery then I hope you people are willing the to pay the price of cleaning it up through out the world if something goes wrong because nuclear reactors requires a lot of highly radioactive material compared to a nuclear battery.
This has been hotly debated by various scientist, environmentalists and politicians through out the space age.

I was about to post, until you have the full translation. The reason it is called Nuclear Power Treasure, is because they are drawing from the term "充电I宝“ or charge battery treasure (external battery pack use for cellphone charging on the go). Like the article, it is meant for offshore rigs or island power generation. Think of it like a nuclear reactor for air craft carrier. It is mobile and used for powering a lot of things, including turning salt water into drinkable water, except it isn't used to power a ship

The video is indeed talking about a nuclear battery rather than a reactor.

English Wikipedia page on nuclear power in space with links to more information on some of the specific projects:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Overview from the international industry group World Nuclear Association:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
You guys don't get it, do you.
I'm not really that worried about possible nuclear leakage in orbit. That is not going to do us any harm. The problem with launching a nuclear reactor with a rocket is the real possibility of rocket failure resulting for the reactor falling out of the sky. This is the main concern which got everybody concerned and to my knowledge no nation had ever launched one before.

Basically you guys are launching a dirty bomb since anything in earth orbit will eventually fall back to earth. Bllasting it before it reaches back is not an option either since the reactor would be a chunk a metal that would not burn up during reentry .
Oh no, man, we get it. You're here again propelled by the 2 forces that govern you: 1. Envy of other nations rising while your nation declines causing you to take a negative outlook on every advancement and 2. your desperate desire to look wise using google knowledge to assess the breakthroughs made by the world's leading scientists. "Aw, Jesus! That design will never work! It's too fat; all the passengers on the sides will be thrown all over the cabin because of the steeper angle! Back to the drawing board, guys!" Are you serious? What in this world makes you think that you can pull up a Wikipedia page and pour out insight that these world class scientists, (whose farts are more knowledgeable than you on the subject) have never thought of? What makes you think that China would design a nuclear anything without multiple independent contingency plans for every foreseeable malfunction including those that even a nuclear-educated alternate universe version of you could never imagine? You are out of your mind. You are literally a flea trying to push elephants out of your way to make yourself look big.

But that all pales in comparison to the glaring mistake you made. You couldn't even understand what they were saying before you said it was stupid to launch this into space. Nobody mentioned anything about launching into space. They said it's used for small islands to provide power and drinking water for 50,000 people. It's an ultra-safe lead-cooled land-based mini power station.

So let's recap. You saw the news, didn't bother to understand it (95% your fault, 5% because who the hell names something a "treasure" instead of what it is???). Thought, 'There is no way I'm letting people gloat and be happy about their achievements while my country rolls around in a hog pit trying to figure out which direction is up; I've got to say something negative about it. Let's say they are UTTER FOOLS for doing this because of the safety concerns (ironically without checking that one of the main improvements is actually safety)! That way it'll look like everyone could have done it but we didn't because we're smarter. Aha! Paradox! You invent = you're stupid! Next time, don't invent, like us! Win for us!" So you google/wikipedia'd some shit and posted it and now you're eating gravel cus you never understood what it was about or what you were even saying, right? An illiterate calling nuclear scientists fools. Today started rich LOL

And finally, if all else fails and a disaster ensues, they can always pull a Japan and whistle with their backs turns as it dumps radioactive waste into the environment for a decade. (I know it's only been 6 years, but it doesn't look good for a 10 year cap either.)
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
Oh no, man, we get it. You're here again propelled by the 2 forces that govern you: 1. Envy of other nations rising while your nation declines causing you to take a negative outlook on every advancement and 2. your desperate desire to look wise using google knowledge to assess the breakthroughs made by the world's leading scientists. "Aw, Jesus! That design will never work! It's too fat; all the passengers on the sides will be thrown all over the cabin because of the steeper angle! Back to the drawing board, guys!" Are you serious? What in this world makes you think that you can pull up a Wikipedia page and pour out insight that these world class scientists, (whose farts are more knowledgeable than you on the subject) have never thought of? What makes you think that China would design a nuclear anything without multiple independent contingency plans for every foreseeable malfunction including those that even a nuclear-educated alternate universe version of you could never imagine? You are out of your mind. You are literally a flea trying to push elephants out of your way to make yourself look big.

But that all pales in comparison to the glaring mistake you made. You couldn't even understand what they were saying before you said it was stupid to launch this into space. Nobody mentioned anything about launching into space. They said it's used for small islands to provide power and drinking water for 50,000 people. It's an ultra-safe lead-cooled mini reactor.

So let's recap. You saw the news, didn't bother to understand it (95% your fault, 5% because who the hell names something a "treasure" instead of what it is???). Thought, 'There is no way I'm letting people gloat and be happy about their achievements while my country rolls around in a hog pit trying to figure out which direction is up; I've got to say something negative about it. Let's say it's foolish and poorly-thought out! That way it'll look like everyone could have done it but they didn't because they were smarter. Aha! Paradox! You invent, and you're stupid! Win for us!" So you google/wikipedia'd some shit and posted it and now you're eating gravel cus you never understood what it was about or what you were even saying, right? Okey dokey.

That's what trolls do bro.;)
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Here is Henri K take on the mystery of mini nuclear power
He speculate either a nuclear battery which is unlikely because of low power unlikely to be used for ground based utility, Or it could be mini gas turbine
According to the newspaper The mini reactor is already in operation. I am confused by different institution doing different thing here

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in one of the journals published by the Chinese army, the China National Defense News , China's coastal defense forces are now equipped with "mini nuclear power plant", developed by civil society of the city of Hefei, which relieved the energy problems of some units in remote areas.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The excerpt from the China National Defense News

The news immediately created the buzz on the Chinese internet, and many Internet users are already speculating on the use of this "mini nuclear power plant" in other areas, such as on submarines, but this new Has mostly aroused our question marks.

How is that possible?

We ask this question not because the mini nuclear power plant does not exist and it is a pure invention of Chinese state media, on the contrary, but mainly because we have been following its project since 2016 when it was still in the laboratory Of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and from a planning point of view it seems very unlikely that the mini nuclear power plants have already been delivered to the Chinese army.

Indeed, the newspaper article used a very specific word to call this station: 宝 宝 , which means "Nuclear Pal", in the image of "Charge pal" in English which designates external chargers for electronic devices .

And the word "Nuclear" came out publicly in September last year when the INEST Institute of Nuclear Energy Safety Technology, a branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, made the headline news Revealing their success in testing a molten lead cooling system dedicated to a new miniature rapid neutron reactor called CLEAR-I (一号 一号), currently under development.

INEST researchers then evoked
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which they intend to take 5 years to finalize the first prototype. And they just christened this small reactor to come the "Nuclear Pal" (宝 宝), the same name quoted by the China National Defense News in its article.


And our research has shown that there really is a project to industrialize this mini nuclear plant in the city of Hefei. For example , an agreement
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
between the city of Hefei, INEST, IETP (Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, another research institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the electrician group Private Ying Liu, to build a production site of the "Nuclear PW" class MW (Megawatt) in an industrial area of the city.

The official announcement also gives details of the mini nuclear power plant in question - a fast neutron reactor, cooled with molten lead, that uses supercritical CO2 (CO2-S) turbines in the Brayton cycle.

This last point is particularly interesting and confirms that the Chinese intend to construct a miniaturized nuclear power plant that would not exceed the size of a standard 20-foot
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, with equal power the dimensions of the CO2-S turbine could be reduced by a factor of 10 compared to a conventional steam turbine, with a very significant gain on cost.

It is estimated that a 4-stage CO2-S turbine with a diameter of 10 cm and a length of 1.20 m could supply electricity equivalent to one thousand dwellings.

So if the collaboration agreement to build a production site is only signed in July 2016, and the researchers also indicated that they need 5 years from 2016 to finalize the product, how is it That it is possible that these "nuclear pals" are already manufactured and delivered to the coastal defense troops and the border guards within 10 months?

But the most important question now is, if it is not a mini nuclear power plant, what could it be?

It is believed that two options are possible. The first is that the GTR, a thermoelectric radioisotope generator, is primarily designed for space probes. But this option is unconvincing because the power of these is far too low, a few hundred Watt in general, to power equipment and meet the daily needs of a garrison unit.

The second possibility is that they are in fact combustion gas turbines, with a power of 1, 4 or 35 MW. Indeed, according to an IETP
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(see above), this Chinese institute has set up a company, which has also established itself in the city of Hefei, but since the end of 2013, to develop and industrialize Gas turbine, in particular those of 35 MW.

It is therefore probable that the military journalists of the China National Defense News have mixed the brushes, and it is not excluded either that it is voluntary on their part for this "error".

Naturally, we expect future elements to confirm or disprove this.

To be continued.

Henri K.

Then early in April I posted article about ship based nuclear reactor for offshore application
 
Last edited:

broadsword

Brigadier
Fukushima happened on land, not in space.

At least there are no earthquakes in the space so I assume it's safe.

SB was talking about the danger of launching a nuclear reactor into space. Therefore, I asked if there was ever an accident in space that was as bad as Fukushima. But we can't assume that no earthquake in space means it's safe. Anyway, I'm letting it rest here.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
SB was talking about the danger of launching a nuclear reactor into space. Therefore, I asked if there was ever an accident in space that was as bad as Fukushima. But we can't assume that no earthquake in space means it's safe. Anyway, I'm letting it rest here.
Except SadBlue had no reason to discuss that because that's not what this is about and nobody ever said they planned to launch this into space. He read a title, couldn't understand the actual article, so he imagined what it was, imagined a dangerous scenario for his imaginary object, then, called the developers UTTER FOOLS for making what he imagined they made. Classic blue...
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Oh no, man, we get it. You're here again propelled by the 2 forces that govern you: 1. Envy of other nations rising while your nation declines causing you to take a negative outlook on every advancement and 2. your desperate desire to look wise using google knowledge to assess the breakthroughs made by the world's leading scientists. "Aw, Jesus! That design will never work! It's too fat; all the passengers on the sides will be thrown all over the cabin because of the steeper angle! Back to the drawing board, guys!" Are you serious? What in this world makes you think that you can pull up a Wikipedia page and pour out insight that these world class scientists, (whose farts are more knowledgeable than you on the subject) have never thought of? What makes you think that China would design a nuclear anything without multiple independent contingency plans for every foreseeable malfunction including those that even a nuclear-educated alternate universe version of you could never imagine? You are out of your mind. You are literally a flea trying to push elephants out of your way to make yourself look big.

But that all pales in comparison to the glaring mistake you made. You couldn't even understand what they were saying before you said it was stupid to launch this into space. Nobody mentioned anything about launching into space. They said it's used for small islands to provide power and drinking water for 50,000 people. It's an ultra-safe lead-cooled land-based mini power station.

So let's recap. You saw the news, didn't bother to understand it (95% your fault, 5% because who the hell names something a "treasure" instead of what it is???). Thought, 'There is no way I'm letting people gloat and be happy about their achievements while my country rolls around in a hog pit trying to figure out which direction is up; I've got to say something negative about it. Let's say they are UTTER FOOLS for doing this because of the safety concerns (ironically without checking that one of the main improvements is actually safety)! That way it'll look like everyone could have done it but we didn't because we're smarter. Aha! Paradox! You invent = you're stupid! Next time, don't invent, like us! Win for us!" So you google/wikipedia'd some shit and posted it and now you're eating gravel cus you never understood what it was about or what you were even saying, right? An illiterate calling nuclear scientists fools. Today started rich LOL

And finally, if all else fails and a disaster ensues, they can always pull a Japan and whistle with their backs turns as it dumps radioactive waste into the environment for a decade. (I know it's only been 6 years, but it doesn't look good for a 10 year cap either.)

Envy???
You must be smoking something not allowed!!
Where in the world would you envy a plan that could and may become the worst nuclear disaster, branded as a nation that launches a dirty bomb into orbit?
Basically solar panels can generate enough power to power up most all electrical equipment unlike the past.
Rocket science can and will fail in the past, in the present and, in the future thinking it will not shows arrogance towards nature/or the limit of humans.
 
Top