There's no space for them in China; China's white collar market is super-saturated. I spoke about my story before; I developed my career with every intention of going to China. I chased China's demand from graduating high school all the way into my professional genetics career. But every step, I was 1 step behind and could never catch up to the quickly rising criteria that Chinese institutes looked for in overseas talent. I'm just not that exceptional, not a frontier-pushing innovator who is fought for internationally and very very few scientists, expecially clinical scientists, ever get to become one. So I'll end up in the 87 percent in that study, though my heart and intentions were always in the top 1%. I didn't have a choice not because the US has excellent talent retention but because China has everything it needs and exceptionally high walls for adding anyone else.
As I have previously said, China continues to lose a tremendous amount of top tier talent. Tremendous amount.
That's true for most fields.
There's no space for them in China; China's white collar market is super-saturated. I spoke about my story before; I developed my career with every intention of going to China. I chased China's demand from graduating high school all the way into my professional genetics career. But every step, I was 1 step behind and could never catch up to the quickly rising criteria that Chinese institutes looked for in overseas talent. I'm just not that exceptional, not a frontier-pushing innovator who is fought for internationally and very very few scientists, expecially clinical scientists, ever get to become one. So I'll end up in the 87 percent in that study, though my heart and intentions were always in the top 1%. I didn't have a choice not because the US has excellent talent retention but because China has everything it needs and exceptionally high walls for adding anyone else.
My friend, this graph already selects for the top researchers in the field. None of us are exceptional, so we won't even be in the left side 100 people in the list.
Do you know who will be? Yao Shunyu
He's so GOATed that his Physics professor from Tsinghua said this about him "Even among our professors, no one has reached the current physics level of Yao Shunyu during his undergraduate years."
He still came to the US for his PhD and is working at Google Deepmind.
He is a generational talent even for Tsinghua. Precisely the kind who can lead to ground-breaking results. These sort are leaving China.
If anyone has numbers, I would be really interested to know how much of the Yao undergrad class ended up going abroad. This seems to be the premium batch.
How does it select for top minds? It just says 100 researchers from 2019. Yes, the US certainly got this guy and they're not all bottom of the barrel, but I am also seeing a lot of Chinese highly rated professors move back as well. What I wrote is to point out that China's market saturation is a major factor in the high skew, not that all Chinese scientists that remain in the US are trash. If all these guys were trash, the US would be trash because American STEM is completely dependent on imported scientists.My friend, this graph already selects for the top researchers in the field. None of us are exceptional, so we won't even be in the left side 100 people in the list.
Do you know who will be? Yao Shunyu
He's so GOATed that his Physics professor from Tsinghua said this about him "Even among our professors, no one has reached the current physics level of Yao Shunyu during his undergraduate years."
He still came to the US for his PhD and is working at Google Deepmind.
He is a generational talent even for Tsinghua. Precisely the kind who can lead to ground-breaking results. These sort are leaving China.
If anyone has numbers, I would be really interested to know how much of the Yao undergrad class ended up going abroad. This seems to be the premium batch.
There's no space for them in China; China's white collar market is super-saturated. I spoke about my story before; I developed my career with every intention of going to China. I chased China's demand from graduating high school all the way into my professional genetics career. But every step, I was 1 step behind and could never catch up to the quickly rising criteria that Chinese institutes looked for in overseas talent. I'm just not that exceptional, not a frontier-pushing innovator who is fought for internationally and very very few scientists, expecially clinical scientists, ever get to become one. So I'll end up in the 87 percent in that study, though my heart and intentions were always in the top 1%. I didn't have a choice not because the US has excellent talent retention but because China has everything it needs and exceptionally high walls for adding anyone else.
They do this case by case. If they want a guy because he's a big help for China's tech supremacy, sky's the limit on his salary. To be honest, this person will be taken care of so well in China that money will be irrelevant; everything for a lavish lifestyle will be honor-given to him.The first thing China should do is to hike up the salaries of top scientists. It looks like they need to increase by multiple times for attracting talents.
Yes, there were many attempts to do it. But the same problem always appeared. Along with the top ones, the salary of the worse ones, with old merits etc. but with connections and sharp elbows.. And of course envy and rivalry. Especially in larger teams.The first thing China should do is to hike up the salaries of top scientists. It looks like they need to increase by multiple times for attracting talents.