xihaoli said:
Fact: The Chineses L7 t-59D (80's tech) can achieve 590mm with du sabot.
<snip>
Note: Does anyone know why the east dosent just create a 65+ ton tank to match their western counterparts? The have the engine, and if we consider mobility, both sides would be at an equal disadvantage.
Your estimate on the 105mm DU is very similiar to Jake's wargaming page estimates:
Jake estimates the Chinese 105mm DU penatration value as follows:
Chinese Type-86 105mm DU 460mm(from "short" 105)/480mm(from "long" 105) at 2km
Chinese Type-93 105mm DU 510mm("short")/540mm("long") at 2km
Chinese Type-95 105mm DU 580mm at 2km (from "long" Type-83A 105mm)
I'm curiuos as to where you got the 590mm figure?
=========
As for your question on heavier tanks, I think the "Eastern Block" was dependent on Russian/Soviet designs/exports, and their MBT's are in 40-45 ton rage. Why not something heavier? Perhaps the infrastructure (roads, rail carts, bridges) had its limitations, resource cosntraints, or maybe they wanted to use higher % of common components and manufacturing equipment from previous generation MBT's?
Also, technically, Israel qualifies as an "Eastern" nation. :rofl:
The Merkava MBT is 63-70 tons.