Does anyone know what are those "ribs" near driver's hatch of the early 9910 prototype?
@Gloire_bb
@Gloire_bb
That's not a 292, just shopped photo of 1:35 scale model by Andrei Tarasenko's friend
My guess it's only because of UFP armor structure.Does anyone know what are those "ribs" near driver's hatch of the early 9910 prototype?
@Gloire_bb
That's not a 292, just shopped photo of 1:35 scale model by Andrei Tarasenko's friend
Just to let you know in the video of the autoloader for the VT-5 the ammo is separated from the crew by a door.I hope you understand that there should be armor between ammo and crew compartment to make this concept work. Right?
There is literally a hole behind crew in VT5. Dunno about ZTQ15 for sure tho.
Secondly, ZTQ15 has a lot of stuff right on the turret bustle, which could prevent "blow-out panels" to actually blow-out. Compare it with a clean roof of M1's bustle.
Thirdly, there is only one big "panel" on the top of the turret bustle, which looks more like service/assembly hatch for installing autoloader to the tank on the assembly line. There are no hatches in the bottom of the bustle and bustle looks like an integral part of the turret, so it's probably the way to install autoloader.
All in all, I'm still not convinced that VT5 or ZTQ15 has blow-out panels
The reload is around 4 seconds. Very impressive.Just to let you know in the video of the autoloader for the VT-5 the ammo is separated from the crew by a door.
You can see the door coming back down around the 0:14 mark.View attachment 84723
Okay, good pointYou can see the door coming back down around the 0:14 mark.
Hm. So, looks like ZTZ99A's ERA doesn't have rear flyer plate. Just no space for that between ERA containers and main armor
My guess is it's plate could be just thinner.Hm. So, looks like ZTZ99A's ERA doesn't have rear flyer plate. Just no space for that between ERA containers and main armor