plawolf
Lieutenant General
You have to also remember that those figures would just be the physical thickness.
Since pretty much all modern tanks use composit layered armour rather than just RHSA, so their armour value is going to be considerable higher if translated into RHSA values (which will, of course be highly classified) if you want to compare them to the armour penetration values of modern tank guns, whic is typically thickness of RHSA that can be penetrated.
In addition, the Type99 uses ERAs, which by themselves can stop the best currently fielded sabots.
I have seen legacy Chinese tanks that have been retrofitted with ERA take a hit from a Type 96/99 that only left a dimple on its armour.
Since pretty much all modern tanks use composit layered armour rather than just RHSA, so their armour value is going to be considerable higher if translated into RHSA values (which will, of course be highly classified) if you want to compare them to the armour penetration values of modern tank guns, whic is typically thickness of RHSA that can be penetrated.
In addition, the Type99 uses ERAs, which by themselves can stop the best currently fielded sabots.
I have seen legacy Chinese tanks that have been retrofitted with ERA take a hit from a Type 96/99 that only left a dimple on its armour.