New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) in China

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Oops. Baidu is reportedly releasing a multi-model LLM that outcompetes ChatGPT 4.5 and releasing a reasoning model that competes against DeepSeek-R1 at half API cost. We shall find out soon. If their claims turned out to be nearly true, I would owe Baidu a sincere apology. Since DeepSeek-R1 release, China LLM theme has gone crazy ...

So if Baidu beats GPT 4.5 any company in China can do it?
 

supercat

Major
Mercedes-Benz's global LiDAR supplier and US-blacklisted Hesai plans to open an overseas factory in 2026.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BYD considers to built a factory in Germany. It will be BYD's 3rd factory in Europe, after Hungary and Turkey.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BYD officially unveiled their 1000 kW (1 MW) charger. The first 2 cars that can use this charger are Qin L and Tang L. BYD will build 4,000 of this kind of charging piles initially.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Huawei and Chery's super-factory in Shenzhen is huge.
 

Hyper

Junior Member
Registered Member
Mercedes-Benz's global LiDAR supplier and US-blacklisted Hesai plans to open an overseas factory in 2026.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BYD considers to built a factory in Germany. It will be BYD's 3rd factory in Europe, after Hungary and Turkey.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

BYD officially unveiled their 1000 kW (1 MW) charger. The first 2 cars that can use this charger are Qin L and Tang L. BYD will build 4,000 of this kind of charging piles initially.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Huawei and Chery's super-factory in Shenzhen is huge.
Hesai is no longer blacklisted.
 

iewgnem

Senior Member
Registered Member
As BYD unveiled 10C charging, NIO is doubling down on swapping batteries.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

We´ll see which approach works best. I suspect swapping is the wrong bet given the speed of charging improvements.
There is no "best approach" and China never "bets" on winners, in practice China always build them all, because China can, and it's not just swapping, its also hydrogen.

In NIO's case as far as users are concerned their swapping system is just a fast charger, it's more a business play on defered battery cost than anything.

For EV in general heavy vehicles benefit a lot from swapping as it'll take tens of megawatts of charging power to achieve swapping speed, and if 10MW chargers comes online, there will be applications that require 100MW chargers, then gigawatt chargers etc.
 

Legume7

New Member
Registered Member
There's a lot of controversy going on with the USA LiDAR company Luminar recently. A former NASA engineer uploaded a video claiming that a car equipped with LiDAR from Luminar outperformed Tesla FSD. Luminar claimed the tests were conducted without financial compensation, and then shared this video all over their social media networks to pump up their stock price. The video has 14M+ views at the time of writing.


There's many levels of this scam to unravel. First, I'm 100% the video was paid for by Luminar. Luminar's bleeding cash and only have 1% market share. At one point they were worth over $2B+, which shows how big of a scam they are. On a technical level, they are behind Chinese brands Huawei, Hesai, and Robosense and cost way more. Chinese brands have roughly 70% global EV market share, and that will grow in the future. No Chinese car company will buy LiDAR from an American company when cheaper, better performing domestic alternatives are available. Even non-Chinese automakers like Mercedes (Hesai), BMW (Huawei), and Audi (Huawei) are using Chinese LiDAR, which leaves barely any customers for Luminar, hence their, let me emphasize again, 1% market share. Also, an analysis last July showed that they had 14 months before bankruptcy. They've gotten more investment since then, but it's only a matter of time before they are dead. Thus, I'm sure they released this video to pump up their stock prices ahead of their earnings call in 2 days, which will surely disappoint.


IMG_LiDAR_For_Auto_Mergers_and_acquisitions_YG_June2024 (1)_0.jpg

Also, comparing to Tesla FSD is rather pointless, given that FSD is worse than literally all Chinese self-driving platforms. It looks impressive to uninformed investors, but it says nothing that we don't know already. We've known for ages that LiDAR + cameras beats cameras alone.

The funny thing is that we've seen this play out many times before. Even in clean energy, Solyndra and Northvolt come to mind as Western companies that were hailed as future leaders only to go bankrupt after being exposed as scams. I'm sure Luminar will be the next example, and there will be many more in fields such as hydrogen energy and solid state batteries.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
There's a lot of controversy going on with the USA LiDAR company Luminar recently. A former NASA engineer uploaded a video claiming that a car equipped with LiDAR from Luminar outperformed Tesla FSD. Luminar claimed the tests were conducted without financial compensation, and then shared this video all over their social media networks to pump up their stock price. The video has 14M+ views at the time of writing.


There's many levels of this scam to unravel. First, I'm 100% the video was paid for by Luminar. Luminar's bleeding cash and only have 1% market share. At one point they were worth over $2B+, which shows how big of a scam they are. On a technical level, they are behind Chinese brands Huawei, Hesai, and Robosense and cost way more. Chinese brands have roughly 70% global EV market share, and that will grow in the future. No Chinese car company will buy LiDAR from an American company when cheaper, better performing domestic alternatives are available. Even non-Chinese automakers like Mercedes (Hesai), BMW (Huawei), and Audi (Huawei) are using Chinese LiDAR, which leaves barely any customers for Luminar, hence their, let me emphasize again, 1% market share. Also, an analysis last July showed that they had 14 months before bankruptcy. They've gotten more investment since then, but it's only a matter of time before they are dead. Thus, I'm sure they released this video to pump up their stock prices ahead of their earnings call in 2 days, which will surely disappoint.


View attachment 148124

Also, comparing to Tesla FSD is rather pointless, given that FSD is worse than literally all Chinese self-driving platforms. It looks impressive to uninformed investors, but it says nothing that we don't know already. We've known for ages that LiDAR + cameras beats cameras alone.

The funny thing is that we've seen this play out many times before. Even in clean energy, Solyndra and Northvolt come to mind as Western companies that were hailed as future leaders only to go bankrupt after being exposed as scams. I'm sure Luminar will be the next example, and there will be many more in fields such as hydrogen energy and solid state batteries.

The S.E.C. will be coming to knock on their doors pretty soon.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
There's a lot of controversy going on with the USA LiDAR company Luminar recently. A former NASA engineer uploaded a video claiming that a car equipped with LiDAR from Luminar outperformed Tesla FSD. Luminar claimed the tests were conducted without financial compensation, and then shared this video all over their social media networks to pump up their stock price. The video has 14M+ views at the time of writing.


There's many levels of this scam to unravel. First, I'm 100% the video was paid for by Luminar. Luminar's bleeding cash and only have 1% market share. At one point they were worth over $2B+, which shows how big of a scam they are. On a technical level, they are behind Chinese brands Huawei, Hesai, and Robosense and cost way more. Chinese brands have roughly 70% global EV market share, and that will grow in the future. No Chinese car company will buy LiDAR from an American company when cheaper, better performing domestic alternatives are available. Even non-Chinese automakers like Mercedes (Hesai), BMW (Huawei), and Audi (Huawei) are using Chinese LiDAR, which leaves barely any customers for Luminar, hence their, let me emphasize again, 1% market share. Also, an analysis last July showed that they had 14 months before bankruptcy. They've gotten more investment since then, but it's only a matter of time before they are dead. Thus, I'm sure they released this video to pump up their stock prices ahead of their earnings call in 2 days, which will surely disappoint.


View attachment 148124

Also, comparing to Tesla FSD is rather pointless, given that FSD is worse than literally all Chinese self-driving platforms. It looks impressive to uninformed investors, but it says nothing that we don't know already. We've known for ages that LiDAR + cameras beats cameras alone.

The funny thing is that we've seen this play out many times before. Even in clean energy, Solyndra and Northvolt come to mind as Western companies that were hailed as future leaders only to go bankrupt after being exposed as scams. I'm sure Luminar will be the next example, and there will be many more in fields such as hydrogen energy and solid state batteries.

It’ll be so funny if the execs pulled a MACH Industries and sourced critical components from some third rate Chinese company.
 

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
Actions -> consequences. Sometimes predictable, oftentimes not. And of course, not all predictions are created equal.

FRANKFURT, Germany -- European Union tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles that took effect in October are yielding unexpected consequences. Rather than excluding cheap EVs subsidized with Chinese government cash from the market, they are encouraging automakers to build alliances that increase the EU's reliance on China.

The European Commission imposed new tariffs on Chinese-made EVs several months ago, lifting the total levy as high as 45.3% on some models, alleging they benefit from unfair subsidies.

But financially distressed European automakers are turning to partnerships with Chinese players strong in cost competitiveness. Chinese makers favor the tie-ups since they can gain footholds in Europe.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top