NASA & World Space Exploration...News, Views, Photos & videos

NASA signing $490M contract with Russia

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

By

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

- 08/05/15 01:30 PM EDT

NASA informed lawmakers on Wednesday that because Congress has failed to fully fund its Commercial Crew Program for the last five years, it is signing a $490 million contract extension with Russia to send Americans to space.

The new contract, running through 2019, means that NASA will continue to depend on Russia to get its astronauts to space even as tensions between Washington and Moscow escalate.



It will put money in Russia’s pockets even as U.S. economic sanctions seek to put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s government over the conflict in Ukraine.


It will also make the U.S. susceptible to threats from Russia, which in the past has suggested it could stop taking U.S. astronauts to the International Space Station. The U.S. has relied on Russia since retiring its space shuttle program.

In a letter to a key House appropriator on Wednesday, NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden Jr. also warned that the space program is in danger of missing a 2017 deadline to send U.S. astronauts to space on vehicles created by Boeing and SpaceX.

To meet that deadline, he wrote that Congress needs to meet President Obama’s $1.24 billion budget request for the program.

“The fastest path to bringing these new systems online, launching from America, and ending our sole reliance on Russia is fully funding NASA's Commercial Crew Program in FY 2016,” Bolden wrote in a letter to Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas), who oversees NASA funding in the House.

For the next fiscal year, House Republicans have proposed allocating nearly $250 million less than the request, while Senate Republicans would offer $300 million less.

If Congress doesn’t increase the allocation, Boeing and SpaceX likely will receive orders to immediately suspend all operations either next spring or summer, Bolden said.

And if those orders are issued, Bolden said the existing contracts “may need to be renegotiated, likely resulting in further schedule slippage and increased cost.”

The new contract extension is required because Congress has not fully funded the administration’s budget requests since 2010.

For fiscal year 2011, for example, Obama asked Congress for $500 million for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program. Congress only gave it $321 million. The next year, Obama asked for $850 million and Congress only allocated $400 million.

Due to those low funding levels for five consecutive years, NASA had to ask Congress for more than $1 billion for next year.

A spokeswoman for NASA said if Obama’s request is fully funded, and if NASA can fully pay its contracts, the U.S. commercial vehicles could still be ready by the 2017 date.

“At this point, because of the lack of funding, our commercial partners will likely not be ready by 2017,” the spokeswoman said.

Republicans in both chambers have blamed tight spending ceilings enforce by a 2011 budget deal for the problems. Democrats and the White House want to raise those ceilings for a variety of programs. Some Republicans are against raising any of the ceilings, while others in the GOP want to just raise the ceilings for certain programs, such as defense spending.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday repeated his promise to reporters that he would not allow any more government shutdowns and that Republicans would negotiate with Democrats over spending levels “at some point."

Click to expand...

Orion service module still seen as schedule driver

Posted on August 3, 2015 by

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Artist’s concept of the Orion spacecraft with the European service module’s distinctive X-wing solar panels. Credit: NASA

The pace of the European Space Agency’s development of a power and propulsion module for NASA’s Orion crew capsule will likely determine when an unpiloted test flight of the spaceship and its heavy-lift rocket will take off, NASA officials said last week.

The first flight of NASA’s Space Launch System is currently penciled in some time between July and September 2018, according to Bill Hill, NASA’s deputy associate administrator for exploration systems development.

“We’re a little more than three years away,” Hill told members of the NASA Advisory Council’s human exploration subcommittee July 28.

The mission will send an uncrewed Orion spacecraft into lunar orbit for a mission lasting more than 20 days. The capsule will return to Earth for a parachute-assisted ocean splashdown in a final shakedown before NASA adds final life support systems and crew accommodations for a manned flight around 2021.

NASA working on the deep space exploration rocket and capsule programs under a budget projected at approximately $3 billion per year.

Bill Gerstenmaier, head of NASA’s human spaceflight directorate, told members of the subcommittee the Orion capsule’s European-made service module, which is being developed by Airbus Defense and Space, will probably be the last piece of the critical test flight to be ready for launch.

NASA and ESA officials, together with contractors from Orion-builder Lockheed Martin and Airbus, have discussed shipping the Orion service module from Europe to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida before it is finished. European engineers could travel to the Florida spaceport to complete construction of the service module before its integration with the Orion crew capsule, which is to be assembled by Lockheed Martin at KSC’s Armstrong Operations and Checkout Building.

Engineers plan to introduce changes to the Orion crew module after a successful orbital test flight in December 2014. The upgrades include a switch from a monolithic heat shield made of ablative Avcoat material to blocks of Avcoat, a change intended to improve the manufacturability of the thermal protection system.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A diagram of the Orion crew capsule. Credit: NASA

Last year’s Orion demonstration, called Exploration Flight Test-1, launched on top of a United Launch Alliance Delta 4-Heavy booster, which sent the capsule to an altitude of approximately 3,600 miles on a four-and-a-half hour mission.

The Orion service module, which did not fly on EFT-1, will include propellant tanks, batteries, pressure vessels, four solar array wings and a hypergolic engine for major burns during the mission. NASA is supplying ESA with a space shuttle Orbital Maneuvering System engine to power the Orion spacecraft, with delivery of the engine to Europe expected in early 2016, according to a schedule chart presented by Hill.

ESA is in charge of the service module’s structure, electrical system and fuel tanks. It is the first time NASA has entrusted an international partner with a major component in the critical path of a human spaceflight program.

Without ESA’s part, NASA officials said the first SLS/Orion flight — known as Exploration Mission-1 — could be delayed even further due to U.S. budget constraints. Before partnering with ESA, NASA did not have funding to complete development of the service module in time for a flight in 2017, the original target launch date for EM-1.

The ESA-funded development of the Orion service module counts as Europe’s contribution to the International Space Station’s annual operating costs from 2017 through 2020. ESA discontinued flights of its cargo delivery craft, the Automated Transfer Vehicle, in 2014.

The Orion service module builds on technologies flown on the ATV’s space station resupply missions.

ESA is responsible for paying NASA for 8.3 percent of the space station’s operating budget each year, but the agencies prefer to process the payment through a barter agreement instead of cash. For the years 2017 through 2020, ESA says the service module agreement represents a payment to NASA of 450 million euros, or about $500 million.

Gerstenmaier said the schedule for the Orion service module was always cramped. NASA did not cinch the agreement with ESA to produce the power and propulsion element until early 2013, after European member states formally agreed to the program.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The first Orion test flight launched Dec. 5, 2014, on a United Launch Alliance Delta 4-Heavy rocket. It flew without a functioning service module. Credit: ULA

Other components for the EM-1 test flight have been in design for years longer. In the case of the Orion crew module, where astronauts will live on manned missions set to begin in 2021, development kicked off with NASA’s signing of a contract with Lockheed Martin in 2006 for the agency’s now-canceled Constellation moon program.

Construction of the Space Launch System’s core stage, a huge reservoir of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen for the rocket’s four RS-25 main engines, is also a schedule driver for the 2018 test flight.

The Boeing-built core stage is 27.5 feet in diameter and stands more than 200 feet tall. Special tools were installed at NASA’s Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans to assemble the rocket’s tanks and cylindrical primary structure.

The schedule is too tight to build a full-up test article, so the core stage intended to fly on EM-1 will be shipped to nearby Stennis Space Center in Mississippi in mid-2017 for an all-up test firing with its four RS-25 engines. If the ground verification goes well, the rocket will head to the launch base at the Kennedy Space Center in early 2018.

“I think getting the core stage integrated and tested at Stennis is one of the primary challenges,” Hill told the NASA advisory subcommittee. “I think the Orion (crew module) will make it, only because we’ve been through EFT-1. The European service module will probably be the pacing item to get through launch.”

The Orion program’s confirmation review, a key milestone in any NASA project, is nearing completion, according to Greg Williams, a deputy associate administrator for policy and plans.

The outcome of the confirmation review will bring clarity to the Orion program’s total cost and schedule.

Williams told the NASA Advisory Council that the agency’s leadership has declared the Orion program technically ready to continue into the next phase of development. Formal schedule and cost commitments are still being worked out.

Click to expand...