The Japanese lunar lander (SLIM) survived another lunar night.
Likely has to do with the low performance of the falcon second stage, being one RP-1/lox engine, and not a purpose built hydrogen stage like centaur. A falcon heavy with centaur could do it I bet.NASA says its Gateway module is too heavy for Falcon Heavy despite being only 20 tons (for reference that is lighter than Tianhe core module and Russia's Zvesda module)
View attachment 128734
This comes at a time when a separate report highlights possible overstatement of even Starship's capabilities as Elon Musk is now saying Flight 3 is only targeting 40-50t to orbit.
Isn't the Lunar Gateway supposed to be a space station orbiting the Moon or somewhere in cislunar space?
That makes delivering it to the target more difficult.
Likely has to do with the low performance of the falcon second stage, being one RP-1/lox engine, and not a purpose built hydrogen stage like centaur. A falcon heavy with centaur could do it I bet.
The Falcon 9 was originally designed to be able to be transported by truck to the launch site. Its physical diameter is basically the size limit of what you can transport by flatbed truck.Falcon's thin, long, "aerodynamic" design improves payload capacity, but at the cost of leaving little room for modification of the spacecraft. Changes to the vehicle such as increasing the length of the payload or adding another stage on top (both important enhancements that are required by important government customers) would cause the vehicle to be unstable in flight. Most other rockets are designed to leave room for further changes to the architecture.
They could just use inflatable modules for the Gateway. The satellites might be an issue, if the diameter of the rocket is much smaller than the diameter of the main telescope mirror or something. Then you need to have an expensive origami contraption like the James Webb Space Telescope.The reality is there are structural issues that make it very difficult to fly payloads with heavy mass or irregular shapes like most of NRO's heavy spy satellites or the Gateway's PPE and HALO modules.
This is called the fineness ratio in the industry.Its length-width ratio (idk what the specific term is called in rocketry) is near its maximum and has little room for modification without affecting vehicle dynamics.
Apparently SpaceX is launching its own EVA suit
If you’re confused. The suits that SpaceX has used for Commercial Crew launches are a launch and reentry suit. The difference is major but most Sci-fi movies don’t bother to show it. Basically a launch and entry suit is a pressure suit. It’s just a fabric bag that is pressurized in the event of pressure loss inside the spacecraft. It’s like the suits worn in very high altitude flights… really it is the suit worn in high altitude flight.
Now EVA suits are designed for operating in space outside the space craft. They are designed as personal spacecraft. If you have ever listened to a space skeptic or a moon denier they will at some point point out that a space suit made of fabric should be swollen up like a balloon if you are in space or on the moon. Surprisingly they are correct. It was discovered by both the U.S. and Soviets in the exact same way when the first attempts at a space walk took place that the pressure suit based suits do expand and are as such hard to move in. So back then they just reduced the amount of air in the suit to about a third. Later suits were often designed with articulation points and more like a suit of armor for a European knight with hinged arms, knees and fingers so that the suit would retain a shape and allow movement.
SpaceX’s new suit also has a Heads up display.
On that subject
Because those other EVA suits are really capable of doing anything, having all the joints being flexible which are rigid and making the suit big. On the other hand the tourists who exit dragon capsule in the intended mission aren't doing any complicated work like the guys in ISS, they only need their elbows and shoulders joints to be flexible to a lesser degree to get them out and in the hatch. BTW the video doesn't show any oxygen/breathing/cooling aparatus which is likely through a umbilical cord connected to the capsule. Adding all these things up I doubt it would look much smaller if smaller at all.I am surprised at how thin it looks. It honestly doesn’t look much different from their current re-entry suit. Much smaller then the suits Astronauts currently use when operating on the outside of the ISS.