Modern Piracy on the High Seas

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
yes they are being demonized, have you ever asked one of the pirates why he became a pirate?
Irrespective of "why", what they are doing is wrong and threatening. I just know that the civilized world is not going to sit back while he and his comptriots threaten free sea lanes, threaten and shoot up and destroy property, and threaten lives.

maybe his father was killed and mother raped, and her sisters were sent off to be sex slaves of some warlord, maybe he starved for days and drank nothing but contaminated water, maybe some guerilla force threatened him to join or they'll kill him, he cant find a job.

Cry me a river. That does not make it okay or even understandable when they try and perpetuate the violence. It still must be stopped.

what the heck do you want him to do? be a good citizen?
They can be whatever they want to be...they could simply start by trying to be a good person...but if they try and hijack ships, threaten lives, etc., then they are ultimately going to pay the price for doing so.

get real buddy
I am real...and my opinions and statements are real. So are yours. We simply do not agree.

if i were in that situation i'd do worse things than looting a ship.
And if you did, ultimately you would pay the price too...either domestically when you ran up against a citizen prepared to stop you or the police, or internationally when you ran up against a nation prepared to stop you.

when we look at those pirates the first thing that come to our mind is how "evil"
Actually, no...the first thing I think of is how can we protect innocent life and free commerce on the seas.

pirates have been a threat for more than just the recent months, howcome it became such a big deal now?
It's always been a big deal. They were pretty much stamped out from threatening the major sea lanes for a long time after nations hung enough of them from the yard arms.

the difference between you and i is not in our stances on this issue, both of us think that it is necessary to send ships over there to fight them; the real differences is that i know the ships were sent there not for some righteous intentions but political interests.
Actually I know that there is a military and free commerce component, which gives rise to the other political issue. Of course there are politcal ramifications to use of the military...there always are.

But the real difference, IMHO, lies in responsibility, accountability, and consequences. Irrespective of their circumstance, wrong is wrong, and what they are doing is wrong and needs to be stopped for the sake of the innocent people on the ships and companies that operate them, and the nations that benefit from free commerce. I will not make excuses for it, and am willing to see it stopped.

I also would like to see Somalia helped...but will not excuse piracy and thuggery as a part of the equation or solution.

you may wish that the pirates are eliminated as soon as possible
Actually, I would like to see piracy eliminated. Whether the pirates get eliminated ends up being up to them
 

pla101prc

Senior Member
jeff what you are doing here is exactly what the media is doing, that is demonization and dehumanization. you gotta get real buddy, these ppl dont do it for fun they do it because they have no other choice. this is a forum not the media so you dont have to be politically correct all the time and just realize that your politicians is not out there to do anyone a favour but himself. looks like your extensive knowledge in military hasnt transferred over to the twisted world of politics, these ppl, ie Americans, Chinese, Japanese and Canadians etc didnt make the decision to go over to somalia based on what is right or wrong. i cant believe anyone would take those bullshit that obama and all those ppl are saying seriously, when we talk about this priate stuff in my university class, laws and regulations isnt even part of the discussion, all the focus has been on the impact it has on China's foreign policy or obama's first term as the president, that's what matters, not some dreamed up world of righteousness and justice.
maybe you think that the pirates has always been a great threat, but the media dont seem to agree, all the focus has been on the terrorism and all that, i dont see you talkin about pirates in somalia a year ago.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
jeff what you are doing here is exactly what the media is doing, that is demonization and dehumanization. you gotta get real buddy, these ppl dont do it for fun
Who said anything about "fun". This is serious business on both sides.

they do it because they have no other choice.
No, they do this thing because they choose to do so...for whatever reason...some of them admittedly being harsh.

this is a forum not the media so you dont have to be politically correct all the time ...maybe you think that the pirates has always been a great threat, but the media dont seem to agree, all the focus has been on the terrorism and all that, i dont see you talkin about pirates in somalia a year ago.
In my last post I said that their threat had been reduced for many years to the major sea lanes because of the way the nations routed them out. Lately, ariund Somalia, the threat to the major sea lanes has again reared its ugly head.

As to Somalia, I have been talking to people about Somalia and the situation there since the late 1980s and through the 1990s.

My military knowledge is not my only interest. I have also been very active politically, parrticularly with activism. ANd what I am saying here is certainly not coinsidered "politcally" correct according to today's progressive thinking.

But that progressive thinking does not change the pertinent facts.

Any look at my JEFFHEAD.COM site, or a google of my name will reveal this.

You really should ask a couple of questions and check things like that out before you make a firm statement regarding it.

As to values, rightousness, right and wrong, politics, etc. While it is true that there are a lot of amoral and immoral politicans and leaders...in the end they have to appeal to one degree or another to the fundamental value system of the society they either represent or lead. If they do not, then ultimately they fall from power.

This is the truth of politics from time immorial. Either the sensibilites of the people in the nations or maintained (even at a low level), or they and those of the people surrounding it will sour if equity is not addressed and that power will fall.

Those politicans and leaders usually last longest who naturally and sincerely attempt to weigh the moral and political issues against national interests and actions. All come into play. Others try and fool their people...but this can only last so long as ultimately their actions and their words do not line up and it besomce obvious to the people.

In a western style constitutional republic (because that is what most are as opposed to true democracies) this change happens quicker associated with election cycles and is usually less violent. In totalitarian states it can take much longer but can also be very violent.

As a student you are exposed to a fairly limited life's experience to date (this is a general statement and applies if you are young) and a whole lot of what professors are telling you. Philosphically many professors are quite bright...but the real world is always a better teacher in the end. A mix of both can be very good, if the latter is given priority once the student graduates and gets out in the real world with a real career, family, responsibilites, etc., etc.

My Dad (who was a master degreed dynamics engineer and extremely talented), God rest his soul, taught it to my like this.

"We all know what BS is. MS is just "more of the same", and PHD is the same stuff "piled higher and deeper".

He told me to get my education (which I did) and then use it to help me understand the real world as I worked in my career...not to try and use it to control the real world. Sort of like in a military a good officere listens to and benefits from his NCOs...while officers that already know it all and insist on pure textbook solutions can get a lot of people killed.

Anyhow...good luck in your studies.

What is happening in Somalia is the "real" world writ large on life's canvas. There is good and bad. And the nations responding to the piracy are doing so for all sorts of reasons...but in the end, those reasons better reflect something of their underlying value system or things will go even worse awry.

I know a lot of military people in the US, their commanders, and some of the polciy makers. I am telling you honestly and sincerely that there is a lot more "value" thinking and reasoning mixed in with the use of the US military than your current cynical view indicates.

You are free to believe that or not...but again, it does not change the truth of it.

Anyhow, I believe I have stated my own reasoning and the ideas behind it. Other folks reading can make up their own mind and judge accordingly. But I believe you are going to see the "pirate" issue addressed at sea and that more nations will respond directly to it as, IMHO, they should.

Hopefully, at some point some of the issues on shore will be addressed...but sometimes that takes a long time, and other times you can't solve all the problems in any case.

But in the mean time the pirate issue at sea can be addressed...as per my posts earlier on this thread.
 
Last edited:

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
What laws have they actually broken and within who's jurisdiction?

International maritime law. By any moral standard the pirates are theives and need to be dealt with as such.

you oversimplified the issue. no one ever said that they should be left to do whatever they want, but if you wanna deal with them you gotta do more than just dealing with them "harshly". personally if i were the president of the US or whatever country, i will definitely send ships over to fight pirates because it is in the interest of my country and prolly myself.

Thank you.

Read my simplified response above.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
pla101prc, if there were a large number of unemployed people in an area, with no benefits and no prospect of jobs, who robbed and kidnapped those who had to travel through on their way to work, are you telling me that would be fine because they needed something to do? What if it was a member of your family - you wouldn't call the Police?!

Every part of the world's oceans should be safe to use (bar nature's influence) just as parts of a country should be safe to travel through. They're not always, but that's why it's acceptable for security forces to take action to make them safe.

It's true that many of these pirates break the law because there's little else to do, but if you take the view that they shouldn't be stopped because of that then you're saying poor people should never be arrested by the Police because they only do it because they're poor. Really that's a completely unsustainable position. You have to apply the law otherwise it will encourage people who could do something else but see crime/piracy as a way of making money easily and quickly to join in.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
International maritime law. By any moral standard the pirates are theives and need to be dealt with as such.

Have you signed such a law? have I? no, but we are held to account because our Governments have and so when we offend we can be brought to justice.

There is no Somali government to make such an accord or enforce it, thus they are not directly held to account for its breach. This is not a question of good or bad or right or wrong, its about the practicalities of stamping out a scourge and not simply tinkering with the symptoms. It is a real problem as; like any wound, left untreated it will spread and fester.

Somalia is a almost unique case in as all the other piracy hotspots do have functioning governments that are obligated to act or take responsibility for the criminal justice of those which are caught. If anyone captures Somalias, you have only the following choices:

a) Shoot them out of hand

b) Try and put them through your own National Criminal Justice system (assuming that legal jurisdiction will be permitted by your courts)

c) Disarm and release them.

Well a) is obviously barbaric and would be a major contravention of any number of major legal acts to do with the treatment of combatants, illegal combatants or civilians.

b) Is a nightmare, what exactly could the UK threaten these guys with through our legal system? A warm bed, clothing, food three times a day, free health care and an environment considerably safer than the one in which they currently live. After prison UK Asylum and Human Rights law would guarantee that they would never be deported and they could probably look forward to free housing and benefits till the end of their lives. Now is this liekly to encourage or discourage piracy?

c) not surprisingly, is the only option that any navy seems to be exercising and given the the other options this is hardly surprising.

Ultimately it needs to be recognised that only Somalis that have real power or influence are able to restore order and so these people need to be engaged and supported irrespective of who they are. It is afterall another of Deng's cats. If the International community continues to fail to show leadership in resolving the problem, it will only increase in intensity, spread to destabilise other weak states in the region and (assuming increasing gung ho use of firepower against them) encourage the spread of religious radicalism and jihad, turning fast boat robbers into fast boat bombers.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Have you signed such a law?

No. But I am aware of such law and have read portions of said law that pertained to the USN many, many years ago.. And I and everyone else should abide by it when at sea.

There is no Somali government to make such an accord or enforce it, thus they are not directly held to account for its breach

I does not matter. The criminal pirates still are responsible for their actions and should be punished as such by that international maritime law..

So in your opinion the pirates should be able to roam the open seas and interfere with commerce as they see fit because there is no central government in Somalia that could enforce such a law?

Once again;
By any moral standard the pirates are thieves and need to be dealt with as such.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
No. But I am aware of such law and have read portions of said law that pertained to the USN many, many years ago.. And I and everyone else should abide by it when at sea.



I does not matter. The criminal pirates still are responsible for their actions and should be punished as such by that international maritime law..

So in your opinion the pirates should be able to roam the open seas and interfere with commerce as they see fit because there is no central government in Somalia that could enforce such a law?

Once again;
The method for dealing with piracy on the high seas have been established over hundred, even thousands of years...and when applied, though harsh, they are effective.

They are harsh because history has shown that, unabated, piracy becomes even more harsh and is a scurge to commerce and innocent human life.

Pircy needs to be dealt with directly, and, IMHO, harshly. History has proven this and I agree completely with you popeye, by any moral standard whatsoever, it is obviously a crime.

Trying to address all underlying cause is a noble effort, but it is also one that has not and is not reducing this particular scurge. Until a method for stabilizing Somalia that is effective comes into being...and it has not for years, and probably will not for more years...the scurge of piracy can and should be addressed.

Let the pirates decide...either cease and desist, or when confronted give up and be tried...or suffer the consequences, which usually means death. It is their decision and as time goes on and this direct rule regarding piracy is applied (wehich has proven successful in past generatuions), there will be less and less who chose to particpate because: 1) They will see that they are risking their lives and it is not worth it, or 2) Because those willing to do it are no longer around to do so.

BTW, I did not sign the law limiting the speed limit in my town to 35 MPH, or 20 MPH in school zones...but I abide by it anyway.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
It appears the hiring of private security worked in the below case of an Italian cruise ship..Will this be how merchants protect their assest in the future on the high seas???

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


A captain of an Italian cruise ship has given the BBC a dramatic account of how his crew fended off a pirate attack near the coast of Somalia.

Capt Ciro Pinto said six pirates in a speedboat approached his Melody ship and opened fire, but then fled after security men fired in the air.

He said his crew also sprayed water on the gunmen when they tried to climb aboard using a ladder.

No-one was hurt in Saturday's incident. Some 1,500 people were on the vessel.

Somali pirates have also seized an empty Yemeni oil tanker and clashed with coast guards on Sunday, a Yemeni official said.

Two pirates were killed in the action as the Yemeni coast guard tried to free the vessel, a Yemeni government official was quoted by Reuters news agency as saying.

The official said three pirates and two Yemeni coast guards were also wounded in the exchange.

See map of how piracy is affecting the region and countries around the world

Last year, pirates attacked more than 100 ships in the region, demanding huge ransom for their release. Their attacks have intensified recently.

'Throwing chairs'

Capt Pinto told the BBC that the pirates tried to hijack his ship late on Saturday, about 290km (180 miles) north of Victoria in the Seychelles.

"One white small boat with six people on board approached the port
side of the ship and started shooting."

The captain said the pirates fired some 200 rounds of shots on the vessel.

His said "our security started shooting in the air... and also we started spraying some water" to beat off the attackers.

Capt Pinto said the pirates were forced to give up after about five minutes of shooting and a high-speed chase.

Samantha Hendey from Durban, South Africa, told the BBC that her sister Tabitha Nicholson was on board the ship during the attack and the situation was "pretty dramatic".

"She said that there were lots of passengers on deck watching it unfold and they even took action themselves by throwing chairs overboard, trying to hit the pirates," Samantha said.

"She said there were lots of bullet holes in the ship but that they were not serious enough to force it to return to port."

The head of the Italy's MSC Cruises, which owns the Meloday, credited the captain for his "cool-headed" handling of the incident, Italy's Ansa news agency reported.

The ship was on a cruise from South Africa to Italy. It was now headed as scheduled for the Jordanian port of Aqaba.

Somali pirates have hijacked about a dozen ships since the start of April, despite the presence of around 20 foreign naval vessels in the area.

International warships have been patrolling the waters off Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden in recent months as part of an effort to counter piracy.

They have freed a number of ships, but attacks have continued.

Somalia has been without an effective administration since 1991, fuelling the lawlessness which has allowed piracy to thrive.

Shipping companies last year handed over about $80m (£54m) in ransom payments to the gangs.​
 
Top