This is not correct comparison. The kind of weapons that Ukraine wants or need are not the ones that Western MIC invested recently.
look at Japan and Australia orders of Tomhawk missiles. Correct numbers will be classified as this military procurement
I still think is a correct comparison given the security situation of China which is closer to home and mostly concentrated. They could keep the numbers classified all they want but all will depend of the speed and quantity that China could make their own, if they will able to make cheaper and faster alternatives to grind the stockpiles of their potential adversaries in a long protracted war.
South Korea has own missile systems and i am sure they are benefiting from R&D and Parts of much larger US supply chain . since export numbers are getting larger. it is easy to assume that US production capacity is getting bigger.
That is a double edge sword on its own if the supply chain is so sparse then is vulnerable to disruptions like a pandemic or shortage of materials, the Chinese military supply chain they have almost everything at home including military chips, which by the way CETC could supply without the need of going to fabs like SMIC or HHGrace . The other problems are prices and overcomplexity, there this tendency in Western military contractors in creating overprice complex systems that they market as superweapons, the problem is that they can just make a few at any given time and the price is so high that the militaries can only afford a few. The switchblade hype come to my mind, marketed as a superweapon by MSM has been overshadow by cheap Chinese drones with grenades attach to them.
My two cents.
My two cents.
