Just noticed that. I've tried to get it to be more argumentative but in almost every contential issue I ask it goes "both sides bad, mmmmmkay?. There are some allegations for and against the claims!"
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Just noticed that. I've tried to get it to be more argumentative but in almost every contential issue I ask it goes "both sides bad, mmmmmkay?. There are some allegations for and against the claims!"
General gist is usually reproducible - it can be worded differently but what @Phead128 had on his first screen is the default ChatGPT behaviour. I used ChatGPT extensively for some time and it has somewhat of a encyclopedic-style of answering like on that screenshot, therefore whenever there is a divergence from that it usually means that the user is not showing the full chat history. Plus as @sheogorath correctly pointed, it won't take some side in any contentious issue - I've even tried asking small stuff about like "who is the best character in X" and it will usually just list the primary characters while providing arguments for each of them, and if you ask about some random second-rate character from the same media, it will say sth like "oh yeah, X can also be the best character because ..."
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
You'd have to be very sick in the head to just make up meaningless terms. "Very poor wages" and "high poverity rates" have no meaning without numbers. It seems like it's all born from hatred instead of fact. Here, let me demonstrate how to make a facts-based argument:
Is Russia a third world country? No, it is listed as a second world country and was a member of the G8 developed economies.
Does Russia have a very poor economy? No, it has the 6th highest GDP by PPP in the world, the 55th highest GDP PPP per capita and has the 42nd highest income out of nearly 200 countries:
This conversation clearly states that the Knowledge cutoff for ChatGPT is 2021 when Abe was still alive. So, its obvious it will say Abe is not dead based on its level of knowledge.
I don't get why what ChatGPT says is given such importance here. Its just a Neural Network that matches input pattern to generate output pattern. That's what all machine Learning Models do. There is no "understanding" of actual words and what they mean. There is just matching pattern from input to output based on a vast dataset. The only new trick here is generative AI. Which again, optimizes for reducing error without any intrinsic understanding of what is being said.
I think Russia has graduated above second world. Even though she is RT journalist but her workholic and introvert personality made me think her observations will be more accurate.
Last edited:
If the IMF was saying doom and gloom about the Russian economy you would be quoting them left and right but since it doesn't suit your cope, you dismiss it. I mean, this is the same IMF that is buying Ukraine on the cheap
Most of the third world countries would dream of having the industrial capacity Russia has.
From what I heard, they indicted him 34 times with 1 for every monthly installments which was then further split down into 1 for every invoices, checks, etc. So 1 transaction turned into 34 felonies for up to 136 years
If it's knowledge cutoff is 2021, then how come it doesn't reply "that information is beyond the scope of my program"? I mean it provides that reply for so many other things.