Miscellaneous News

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well hydrochloric acid isn't so bad to humans, as human skin is hydrophobic and inert to most non oxidizing acids like HCl. We have pH = 1 HCl in our stomachs and we're just fine, while pH = 1 HCl will corrode even stainless steel rapidly. But of course it wasn't an HCl spill, the actual spill is quite dangerous.
Correct. On the other hand sulfuric acid is really bad, the fav of scum revenge attackers.
 

alfreddango

Junior Member
Registered Member
Song Tao, Director of Taiwan Affairs Office invited DPP to visit Beijing and DPP in return invited Song Tao to visit Taiwan.
You see DPP have very acute sense of smell when it comes to money and power. They see KMT sending their number 2 to Beijing and they immediately want to get in that deal and not be left out.

You might feel like this sort of thing is much less emotionally satisfying than AR, but seems to me like chance for peaceful reunification is actually growing and that's a good thing.
Or the dpp might just pay lip service, get a deal and run off with the money
at the end of the day, they’re not the ones in charge
 

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Song Tao, Director of Taiwan Affairs Office invited DPP to visit Beijing and DPP in return invited Song Tao to visit Taiwan.
You see DPP have very acute sense of smell when it comes to money and power. They see KMT sending their number 2 to Beijing and they immediately want to get in that deal and not be left out.

You might feel like this sort of thing is much less emotionally satisfying than AR, but seems to me like chance for peaceful reunification is actually growing and that's a good thing.
Indeed, if we can actually achieve a peaceful reunification, that would the biggest up yours to the fucking West, especially the US.

I can only wish the wanwanese will come to their senses and do the right thing.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Similar mindset:

Look, China doesn't need to announce the number of nuclear warheads they have. Announcing the number would definitely cause alarm bells to ring around China's neighbours, especially the likes of Japan and India. This could even kickstart a nuclear arms race around China's vicinity and nullifying China's MAD advantage over all her neighbours (bar Russia).

What China should do instead, is to:
1. Pump out ICBM TEL launchers,
2. Pump out VLO strategic bombers in greater numbers,
3. Pump out SSBNs in greater numbers,
4. Keep expanding those ICBM silo fields in the northwest,
5. Keep expanding the number (and perhaps size as well) of ICBM TEL brigades, and
6. Keep expanding the Underground Great Wall network.
(Of course, while secretly expanding their nuclear warhead count as well).

Individual nuclear warheads can be hidden underground and kept beyond the reach of public eyes and overflying satellites, but the number of launch facilities, ICBM brigade bases, bomber-based air bases and submarine bases will cannot be hidden from overflying satellites, if not from the public eye.

The idea is to keep the Pentagon and White House guessing the exact number of China's nuclear warheads, but letting them have a rough idea on the size of China's nuclear arsenal. Doing the above is enough to send a stern message to the warhawk policy-makers and decision-makers in Washington DC, which is sufficient to keep them in line and not attempt anything stupid against China.
There is just zero incentive for China to suddenly talk loudly about nukes when it hasn't needed to do it, ever.

Especially now that India is able to create nukes that could at least hit western China and Japan can probably create dirty bombs at very least.

If there is an imminent nuclear threat, then China could make its talk immediately then. For example through an emergency broadcast where they reveal the approximate location of 500+ missiles and explain which American cities will be hit in the event of US nuclear aggression, and then explain that besides the 500 revealed, there are several times more nukes that have been moved to launch on warning as well.

Sure, US might be able to initially censor that broadcast domestically, but rest of the world would react on it, and many Americans are not that isolated from international platforms, so US being able to fully censor it seems impossible.
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
The only problem i see if the u.s decides to invade taiwan, whats gonna happen if they lose? I think most of us here can agree that there is huge chance if not likely that the americans will lose fighting China over taiwan.

If they are defeated they will lose huge part of their navy including carriers and might even lose their bases in japan, guam or even south korea

In their history we never see the americans take a huge gamble like that, they never fight a war they are not 100% sure they gonna win militarily, especially not against a nuclear power, if they are so adamant that they must fight China by 2025 like somekind of deadline, whats the hurry? What makes them have the confidence to do so?

One possibility is they don't care if they lose, and is willing to sacrifice their presence in east asia as long as they can burn the whole of east asia (which is btw the world economic engine) in a war while their homeland and industries stays unmolested
They would not get unmolested. When Japan started out ww2, their homeland was also untouchable except by one off raids. But the enemy and her industrial capability to make more platforms always gets a vote.

Another aspect is that besides with artillery, modern forces are not geared to burn down large areas of infrastructure. So US might be able to burn Taiwan province if they enlist the help of Beijing to turn it into a massive war zone, but damaging any major mainland city is almost out of the question.

America only has 141 bombers. That is actually less than Russia which has about 150. As we have seen in the Ukraine war, against relatively complex cities that have complete air defenses, even if outdated 90s soviet ones, strategic destruction is unable to happen.

Coastal cities such as Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tianjin have relative to US bases about the same strategic depth as Lviv or Kiev has relative to Russian bases.

And China's military industrial heartland of Chongqing, Xian, Chengdu and so are many times further inland.

Even if you generously assume US bomber force are 200%-300% more effective than VKS (even though there is no real indication they would be any better at lobbing cruise missiles), China also has massively better air defenses than Ukraine, and it can also fire annihilating salvoes back at the bases.

That means, even if full scale war is waging in the straits, it is almost certain that people even in coastal China will keep having more or less normal lives.
 
Top