Miscellaneous News

X

xypher

Senior Member
Registered Member
taxiya said:
and somehow your other source is supposed to be better? What a "I am better than everybody else"!
Click to expand...
You just keep grasping for straws and trying to shift the topic to some personal stuff. First of all, there are multiple sources, not "other source". You can search for them yourself in Russian, and if you don't understand some of the sources I provided, then I can translate the parts. Secondly, what part of the message says that "I am better than everybody else"? Me saying that debunking Twitter posts exaggerating stuff on the Finnish border does not invalidate posts by different sources like local Russian\Kazakh\etc. media or people chatting in TG? Lol, truly spectacular logical leap there. Btw, are you in Russia right now?
kokole said:
You make an elephant out of a fly!

Today, all the Ukrainian and Western propaganda is thundering about the protests in Moscow. It turns out that there are only 2000-3000 protesters in Moscow, a city of 11 million.

The other day in Vienna and Brussels, which are cities with ten times less population than Moscow, there were over 15,000-20,000 thousand protesters against energy prices. In the Czech capital Prague (population 1.3 million) a protest was held with over 100,000 protesters. But the Western media is conveniently silent and unimpressed by these numbers and protests, but today they brazenly hyped the measly protest with 2,000 protesters in Moscow, a city of 11 million.
Click to expand...
I am not even talking about protests nor did I provide posts by Ukrainian\Western media. That being said, could you say where did you get the 2-3k protesters in Moscow number? I remember reading In Kommersant that around 500 were arrested in Moscow. For example, during the Navalny protests around 4-5 k people were arrested with estimates of around 100k protesting (total). I don't think Russian authorities would arrest 20-30% of the protesters.
 
Last edited:
N

Nutrient

Junior Member
Registered Member
Overbom said:
48 seconds too many.
Why does he think that servants have the qualifications to talk directly to their Lord for even 1 second? There is hierarchy.

Don't they know that above them is Japan? First they talk with Japan, then Japan talks to Australia, then Australia to a random 4th Level US diplomat and then all the way up to the President.

Mr.Yoon needs to go back to school and reassess his status
Click to expand...
That's the Mafia (and feudal) philosophy: grovel to your superiors and force your vassels to grovel to you. This philosophy is extremely unwise for the world to follow.

Your system forces every major power to arm itself as much as possible, lest they fall down the hierarchy. Thus in time a number of large countries will be fully armed and ready to leap at each other's throats. Have we seen this scenario before?

Yes we have. Twice in just the previous century: before the first World War and just before the second World War. I doubt that human civilization will survive a third world war.

So we must work towards a better system. As I have said before, "A better system is the absolutely brilliant idea behind the United Nations. The idea is collective security: if a country starts a war, all the other countries in the world will combine to punish the aggressor. In this system, no single country needs to be that heavily armed, and the world becomes far more stable. This is probably the reason that Xi and Putin have repeatedly emphasized the importance of the UN."

If the world continues to be stupid, we will get a third and very final lesson on the foolishness of extending the Mafia system to the global level. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
 
Last edited:
BlackWindMnt

BlackWindMnt

Major
Registered Member
xypher said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Lmao. She was wrong big time like at least two times now and even had to apologize once. But now she made a preemptive excuse for the next time she is going to be wrong, convenient.
Click to expand...
Aah looks like she has discovered the putin card, it allows you to be wrong each time and still be able to reap the rewards.
 
T

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
xypher said:
You just keep grasping for straws and trying to shift the topic to some personal stuff. First of all, there are multiple sources, not "other source".
Click to expand...
No need to answer, what is the difference between multiple and other? As far as I know, there are hundreds "sources" about Xinjiang's "labor camps", doesn't make any of them true.

xypher said:
You can search for them yourself in Russian, and if you don't understand some of the sources I provided, then I can translate the parts.
Click to expand...
Don't you know the saying "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"? Why should people waste more time?

And you pretend this is a language problem? I did not trust the Chinese "source" of "square root" although I speak Chinese, why should I trust any Russian "sources" that one of them is already false?

xypher said:
Secondly, what part of the message says that "I am better than everybody else"?
Click to expand...
when you ask me to continue trust your sources even though one of them are already debunked.

xypher said:
Me saying that debunking Twitter posts exaggerating stuff on the Finnish border does not invalidate posts by different sources like local Russian\Kazakh\etc. media or people chatting in TG? Lol, truly spectacular logical leap there.
Click to expand...
It does invalidate the credibility of the originator of the source. Just like Sandam's WMD, or Xinjiang's slavery camp. That logic is only learnt and grasped by people on the other side of the west, of course.

xypher said:
Btw, are you in Russia right now?
Click to expand...
hehe, without answering my question about you being at the borders of Kazakhstan and Mongolia, you now ask if I am in Russia? Talking about shifting topics.
 
Last edited:
X

xypher

Senior Member
Registered Member
taxiya said:
No need to answer, what is the difference between multiple and other? As far as I know, there are hundreds "sources" about Xinjiang's "labor camps", doesn't make any of them true.
Click to expand...
taxiya said:
Don't you know the saying "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"? Why should people waste more time?
Click to expand...
We know that the information about Xinjiang comes from Adrian Zenz and the likes because they literally cite them in every single article they write. Could you show the same for the sources I provided? I will gladly concede if you do so.
taxiya said:
when you ask me to continue trust your sources even though one of them are already debunked.
Click to expand...
What an amazing logical conclusion, and a very ironic one. You are the one telling me that the different sources from local media both in Russia and Kazakhstan for the different borders are all fake because post from Twitter about "35 km traffic jam" (was not in my link, btw) on the Finnish border got debunked.
taxiya said:
It does invalidate the credibility of the originator of the source. Just like Sandam's WMD, or Xinjiang's slavery camp. That logic is only learnt and grasped by Chinese, of course.
Click to expand...
I think that logic is grasped mostly by you because in none of your posts did you provide proofs that the sources have a common originator unlike the Xinjiang 'news' (Adrian Zenz for 90% of them).
hehe, without answering my question about you being at the borders of Kazakhstan and Mongolia, you now ask if I am in Russia? Talking about shifting topics.
Click to expand...
I already answered your question and where I got the information, you are still commenting about that answer in case you didn't notice. You, on the other hand, ignored my previous question on that topic. I am asking you because you seem to be so sure that nothing of the stuff that is being talked on Russian TG chats is happenning, so you must be there, right? Or you are like those China experts who never set foot in China but know everything better than locals?
And you pretend this is a language problem? I did not trust the Chinese "source" of "square root" although I speak Chinese, why should I trust any Russian "sources" that one of them is already false?
Click to expand...
So, every single source was made by the same person who posted about the Finnish border? Interesting, provide the proofs. Or you are grasping at straws again?
 
T

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
xypher said:
We know that the information about Xinjiang comes from Adrian Zenz and the likes because they literally cite them in every single article they write. Could you show the same for the sources I provided? I will gladly concede if you do so.

What an amazing logical conclusion, and a very ironic one. You are the one telling me that the different sources from local media both in Russia and Kazakhstan for the different borders are all fake because post from Twitter about "35 km traffic jam" (was not in my link, btw) on the Finnish border got debunked.

I think that logic is grasped mostly by you because in none of your posts did you provide proofs that the sources have a common originator unlike the Xinjiang 'news' (Adrian Zenz for 90% of them).

I already answered your question and where I got the information, you are still commenting about that answer in case you didn't notice. You, on the other hand, ignored my previous question on that topic. I am asking you because you seem to be so sure that nothing of the stuff that is being talked on Russian TG chats is happenning, so you must be there, right? Or you are like those China experts who never set foot in China but know everything better than locals?

So, every single source was made by the same person who posted about the Finnish border? Interesting, provide the proofs. Or you are grasping at straws again?
Click to expand...
I see the tactic of dragging into a back-forth, you have the stage now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top