Because Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are some of the most liberal democratic countries in the world.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
At this point in time when China has yet to be fully equipped and it's defense spending increased relative to the threats its facing? I though you were advocating for a build up of all the necessary elements needed to not only defeat the US close to China's periphery and as you just replied, curbstopmed the US once and for all.
How does what I said contradict my view? Attacking the US pre-emptively is the correct move no matter whether the balance of power slightly or overwhelmingly favours China. Winning modern wars depends almost entirely on landing a fast and devastating first blow.
Ah yes, the Cobra Kai philosophy. However, military force is not the only facet of modern warfare. Lots of levers to pull to hurt the opponent before a single shot needs to be fired. Some of these will be even more effective than direct confrontation.
Bravo to the ones who made this:
And remember to update the collection:
Don't forget to say our thanks to these "Based-in-China Western journalist":
Imagine if the convo between a mainlander and Westerner turned out like this:
And remember to update the collection:
Don't forget to say our thanks to these "Based-in-China Western journalist":
Imagine if the convo between a mainlander and Westerner turned out like this:
Hard disagree. Again, if the only possible way to defeat the undeclared enemy is to cowardly attack in order to gain a supposed advantage but not a guaranteed victory is just pathetically weak and deserves to lose.
I have yet to read and learn that such preemptive attacks has resulted total victory against any country of significant influence and stature.
That policeman be like: "squad, there's an obese european man lying on his back in that ditch. He's holding a camera but I can't tell if he has any vital signs. Do I need to call an ambulance?"