Miscellaneous News

A potato

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

While the US paints Mao as the most incompetant leader in Chinese history West Point Cadets unironically study him via his book on guerilla warfare like how they study Rommel's tactics.

Mao Zedong is apperently respected in West Point which is not unrealistic given how the Generals that worked with KMT wanted to work with the CCP instead and the USMC fireteam tactics had it's origins from Mao.
1783261323103.png
(Why did my successors abandon my teachings and the Capitalists are embracing them?)
 

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
Seems like working with communist China is a popular trend. View attachment 177677
I dont think these people thought through if its a good idea to attribute all their most popular domestic demands to China, or appointing China as an ally of their largest religon.

But then again the Chosen People have never been good at keeping an empire together or avoiding getting pogromed
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member

so long as Indians and white males are restricted from access to Chinese HR and levers of power and influence, I wouldn’t care, I also don’t want to see white female karens trying to change China from within, if they don’t become Chinese, they should be shown the door.
Besides, it’s not like their own home nations greeted Chinese emigres with open arms, the last 200 years have been replete with anti Chinese pogroms. Basically, foreigners in China should learn to be meek and compliant and non threatening, exactly as they expect all Asians to be in the west.

I dont think these people thought through if its a good idea to attribute all their most popular domestic demands to China, or appointing China as an ally of their largest religon.

But then again the Chosen People have never been good at keeping an empire together or avoiding getting pogromed
This is the same Ashkenazi IQ that believes it prudent to force western liberal governments to force the banning of criticism against Israel.


I still remember when China entered western competitions such as fastest supercomputer race, it enabled Obama and the USG to selectively sanction Chinese tech companies, universities and competitors. There os nothing to be gained from sharing Chinese ingenuity with the west who, as Putin put it, “have no principles and will do anything, say anything, lie et al to achieve their aims”
 

Chevalier

Major
Registered Member
Seems like Germany should boost domestic consumption instead leaning on export to make up for their economic collapse, they wouldnt need to export their industrial heaters for example if they paid Germans enough to buy an industrial heater for every man woman and child.

Clearly Germany is suffering from massive overcapacity in Mittelstand, they should thank China for helping them optimize the size of their industry to a more sustainable, domestic consumption driven model befitting a small, talentless, energyless, technologyless, friendless nation who suppert Israel and Ukraine without question.
Im more alarmed by how these Europeans and Anglos aren’t using that inferred whites supremacy their entire attitude betrays. From the 90s onwards, it was inferred by western mouthpieces that Freedom and liberal democracy was what gave white ppl the edge in tech, along with the implicit assertion that white ppl were so divinely gifted that they could magic technology ex nihilio. But, as one Chinese communist party official once said, “semiconductors are made by man, not gods” so sadly the western liberals and Zionists lost a potential worshiper in the Chinese. They would have to make do with Indians whose innovation concentrated mainly in scamming and gaumutra.


I find it hard to believe that the CPC would be so merciless and uncompromising, but then and again, the EU did rip up the CAI and join trump in his trade and tech wars. To this day, DeepSeek is banned in Germany.


btw all that Chinese investment and monies went into the Chinese tech and HK stock exchange for better returns. It certainly didn’t go to the NYSX.
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

While the US paints Mao as the most incompetant leader in Chinese history West Point Cadets unironically study him via his book on guerilla warfare like how they study Rommel's tactics.

Mao Zedong is apperently respected in West Point which is not unrealistic given how the Generals that worked with KMT wanted to work with the CCP instead and the USMC fireteam tactics had it's origins from Mao.
View attachment 177680
(Why did my successors abandon my teachings and the Capitalists are embracing them?)
I thought it was he was good at war but sucked at actually ruling.

If they deny the war part then they are admitting they lost in Korea to a guy who sucked at war apparently.
 

A potato

Senior Member
Registered Member
I thought it was he was good at war but sucked at actually ruling.

If they deny the war part then they are admitting they lost in Korea to a guy who sucked at war apparently.
I mean if he bad at ruling then how come a completely destoryed country became a Nuclear power.

People forgot that the KMT inherited a island already developed by the Japanese and suffered no damage in ww2 along with US aid while the CCP inherited a large country that was completely destoryed with almost no aid what so ever.

The fact that PRC maintained independence while actually started to grow and become stable means Mao did something right. After all KMT had some many famine under their rule while the CCP only had one and after that no more.
 

Randomuser

Major
Registered Member
I mean if he bad at ruling then how come a completely destoryed country became a Nuclear power.

People forgot that the KMT inherited a island already developed by the Japanese and suffered no damage in ww2 along with US aid while the CCP inherited a large country that was completely destoryed with almost no aid what so ever.

The fact that PRC maintained independence while actually started to grow and become stable means Mao did something right. After all KMT had some many famine under their rule while the CCP only had one and after that no more.
Rather than take the Westoid view of him being bad at ruling, I would say it would have been far better to have stepped back a bit and let others have more responsibility for the major decisions as time passed during the 50s. He is still human and can't do everything himself. Then a lot of stuff could have been avoided that would hurt his name.
 
Top